메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
노상헌 (서울시립대학교)
저널정보
한국비교노동법학회 노동법논총 勞動法論叢 第20輯
발행연도
2010.12
수록면
209 - 238 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Despite the rights on facilitation usage must be guaranteed for lawful labor union activities, it also coincides with the right of management of facilities that is derived from property rights. Since labor union members ought to utilize business facilities in its nature of business, it is rather inevitable to face collision of another law referred as the property rights (the rights of facilitation management). To solve this problem rationally, the research shows following suggestions.
The right of management of facilities and the right of use of facilities shall be abused by no more than the claimers; a distinction between inter-and intra- business labor union is not effective in an act of abuse, and the referred labor union shall be accepted as a lawful institution regardless of its quantity, whether singular or plural.
To recognize the act of pervasion,
1) The labor union uses the company's facilities without a serious negotiation or mutual consent, which cannot be assured by the Union Labor Act (abuse of the right of use of facilities)
2) The company does not correspond to the union labor's effort to reach an agreement and refuses the union's use of the facilities, which breaches the Labor Law and the intention of the Supreme Court for the purpose of the management of company (abuse of the right of management of facilities).
Therefore an abuse of the right of management of facilities shall be determined by the Union's effort to use the company's facilities and the company's correspondence to the effort.
The detailed criterion of consideration is shown as follows:
1) Condition and figuration of using facilities,
2) Content and characteristics of the breached right of management of facilities,
3) The union's response to the safety protection of facilities,
4) An option for an alternative facility.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 노동조합 활동권과 시설관리권의 법적 성질
Ⅲ. 초기업적 조합활동과 시설관리권 행사의 판단
Ⅳ. 결론에 갈음하여
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-336-004089501