지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Russian nominal constructions differ from English ones in their lack of determiners, having no article. However, the lack of determiners is compensated for by other morphosyntactic strategies, such as the genitive of negation and the optional agreement of numeral phrases, in which specificity plays a critical role. These morphosyntactic phenomena have been separately analyzed in the literature, with a focus on the scope of negation, the headness of constituents, quantification floating, etc. In my paper, I posit that although there is no independent grammatical category that indicates specificity in Russian, the language utilizes two different types of Nominal Construction to denote specificity and that the aforementioned phenomena are in fact the results of the distinct construction meanings.
I have shown that in languages such as English that utilize the numeral conceptualization strategy, which iconically reflects entities’ properties, the number and specificity of a referent are also grammatically marked. In contrast, in languages that do not denote specificity and recognize a specific referent as a kind, not as a concrete entity, such as Chinese and Korean, neither number nor specificity is grammatically marked. This is because languages of the latter type employ quantitative conceptualization, i.e., they recognize referents as kinds, regardless of referents’ specificity. Quantitatively conceptualized nominal phrases in these languages do not have concrete referents, whose number and definiteness can be marked. Russian employs numeral conceptualization. Thus, in this language we can predict that grammatical marks of definiteness as well as those of number will exist. I propose that while in Russian the specificity or definiteness of a referent is not grammatically marked, the specificity is marked as a construction semantic feature, and two separate construction types should be distinguished for the nominal constructions.
I have shown that in languages such as English that utilize the numeral conceptualization strategy, which iconically reflects entities’ properties, the number and specificity of a referent are also grammatically marked. In contrast, in languages that do not denote specificity and recognize a specific referent as a kind, not as a concrete entity, such as Chinese and Korean, neither number nor specificity is grammatically marked. This is because languages of the latter type employ quantitative conceptualization, i.e., they recognize referents as kinds, regardless of referents’ specificity. Quantitatively conceptualized nominal phrases in these languages do not have concrete referents, whose number and definiteness can be marked. Russian employs numeral conceptualization. Thus, in this language we can predict that grammatical marks of definiteness as well as those of number will exist. I propose that while in Russian the specificity or definiteness of a referent is not grammatically marked, the specificity is marked as a construction semantic feature, and two separate construction types should be distinguished for the nominal constructions.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 개념정의
Ⅲ. 문제제기
Ⅳ. 명사 구문의 두 유형
Ⅴ. 맺는말: 개별적 해석과 양화적 해석
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
비특정성
언어
1994 .12
-
Article Semantics in L2 English Acquisition by Korean Elementary School Students
영어학연구
2013 .01
-
There-존재구문의 의미․화용적 분석—특정성 효과를 중심으로—
영어영문학연구
2015 .01
-
Intervention Effects and Specificity Effects in Wh-questions
어학연구
2017 .08
-
Articles in Natural Languages and Artificial Languages
Journal of Universal Language
2017 .03
-
Русский язык как государственный язык России: история и современность
러시아어문학연구논집
2007 .01
-
우즈벡어에 존재하는 러시아어 영향의 사회언어학적 분석
러시아어문학연구논집
2007 .01
-
The Grammaticalization of Demonstratives : A Comparative Analysis
Journal of Universal Language
2011 .03
-
한국어의 소위 특정성 표지들에 대하여
언어
2005 .12
-
A UG Approach to the Development of L2 English Articles
언어
2012 .12
-
The Role of Semantic Features on the L2 Acquisition of English Articles
언어학 연구
2017 .10
-
비분류사 언어로서의 폴란드어 분류사의 특성
슬라브학보
2010 .09
-
An analysis of Russian and Korean Case
슬라브학보
1994 .06
-
성서 히브리어 명사 문장에서의 한정성에 관한 연구 : 앤더슨, 제네트, 글리너트의 이론을 중심으로
성경원문연구
2011 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-309-004152353