지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2004.12
- 수록면
- 7 - 126 (121page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The explosive use of the Internet gives rise to lot of crimes on the international scenes. Not only hacking and viruses but also illegal activities on the Internet are increasingly conducted across the border.
But countermeasures seem to be ineffective owing to legal, systematic and technological constraints. More often than not the cross-border crimes are beyond the investigation and prosecution of any state. Computer crimes on the Internet call for prompt and efficient investigation of the affected states through international cooperation. Digitalized data in the information age would pose a number of legal issues with respect to privacy, human rights, electronic democracy, national sovereignty, international jurisdiction, and so on. These issues can be tackled by the international coordination of domestic policies and national laws on cybercrime.
Multilateral efforts have been staged by the G-8, the Council of Europe, OECD and APEC to combat cybercrime in a concerted manner. Also the International Criminal Police Organization, or InterPol, and the International Organization on Computer Evidence play an important role in this area. The Meeting of Justice and Interior Ministers of the Eight takes place every two year to discuss the issues on the international cooperation in investigating and prosecuting cybercrime.
The international jurisdiction in the cyberspace might be established by a multilateral agreement in defining illegal activities as international crimes to be punished by the international criminal court. However, the air-tight definition of international crime would not allow the addition of cybercrime to the list of international crime. Also it should be noted whether a certain activity constitutes a criminal offence varies from nation to nation. A type of crime could be punished in a different manner. In short, a crime and punishment will be determined by a variety of political, economical, social and cultural backgrounds of each nation.
Notwithstanding the foregoing difficulties, the Convention on Cybercrime was adopted by the Council of Europe in June 2001. This Convention requires contracting states to make cyber attacks a substantive criminal offence and to adopt procedural and mutual assistance measures to better combat cybercrime across international borders. It stipulates such criminal offences as intentional access to a computer system without right and unauthorized interception, data interference, system interference, misuse of devices, computer-related forgery or fraud, infringement of copyright and related rights. In particular, the Convention provides for the attempt and aiding or abetting of such activities as criminal offences, and the criminal, civil or administrative liability of a corporate as well. It also contains procedural law and measures so as to facilitate the investigation and prosecution of cybercrime.
Though the Convention does not come into force because of the belated ratification of contracting states, it is necessary for Korea to accede to the Convention as soon as possible, and to make the Korean laws consonant with the requirements of the Convention.
Against these backdrops, any nation should be careful of the following limits in the international cooperation to enhance penal justice:
- To establish pornography or gambling as criminal offences varies from country to country in line with the legal and cultural background;
- To deliver its nationals and evidences to other country is hardly possible owing to the supremacy of national sovereignty; and
- To pursue its own national interest, technological and economical advantage could undermine the international cooperation.
But countermeasures seem to be ineffective owing to legal, systematic and technological constraints. More often than not the cross-border crimes are beyond the investigation and prosecution of any state. Computer crimes on the Internet call for prompt and efficient investigation of the affected states through international cooperation. Digitalized data in the information age would pose a number of legal issues with respect to privacy, human rights, electronic democracy, national sovereignty, international jurisdiction, and so on. These issues can be tackled by the international coordination of domestic policies and national laws on cybercrime.
Multilateral efforts have been staged by the G-8, the Council of Europe, OECD and APEC to combat cybercrime in a concerted manner. Also the International Criminal Police Organization, or InterPol, and the International Organization on Computer Evidence play an important role in this area. The Meeting of Justice and Interior Ministers of the Eight takes place every two year to discuss the issues on the international cooperation in investigating and prosecuting cybercrime.
The international jurisdiction in the cyberspace might be established by a multilateral agreement in defining illegal activities as international crimes to be punished by the international criminal court. However, the air-tight definition of international crime would not allow the addition of cybercrime to the list of international crime. Also it should be noted whether a certain activity constitutes a criminal offence varies from nation to nation. A type of crime could be punished in a different manner. In short, a crime and punishment will be determined by a variety of political, economical, social and cultural backgrounds of each nation.
Notwithstanding the foregoing difficulties, the Convention on Cybercrime was adopted by the Council of Europe in June 2001. This Convention requires contracting states to make cyber attacks a substantive criminal offence and to adopt procedural and mutual assistance measures to better combat cybercrime across international borders. It stipulates such criminal offences as intentional access to a computer system without right and unauthorized interception, data interference, system interference, misuse of devices, computer-related forgery or fraud, infringement of copyright and related rights. In particular, the Convention provides for the attempt and aiding or abetting of such activities as criminal offences, and the criminal, civil or administrative liability of a corporate as well. It also contains procedural law and measures so as to facilitate the investigation and prosecution of cybercrime.
Though the Convention does not come into force because of the belated ratification of contracting states, it is necessary for Korea to accede to the Convention as soon as possible, and to make the Korean laws consonant with the requirements of the Convention.
Against these backdrops, any nation should be careful of the following limits in the international cooperation to enhance penal justice:
- To establish pornography or gambling as criminal offences varies from country to country in line with the legal and cultural background;
- To deliver its nationals and evidences to other country is hardly possible owing to the supremacy of national sovereignty; and
- To pursue its own national interest, technological and economical advantage could undermine the international cooperation.
목차
국문초록
제1장 서론
제2장 국경을 넘는 사이버범죄의 유형과 그 실효적 대처방안
제3장 주요각국의 사이버범죄 관련 규제현황
제4장 사이버범죄방지에 관한 국제협력동향
제5장 사이버범죄의 형사재판관할권과 형사사법공조
제6장 형사사법공조에 있어서의 문제점
제7장 유럽 사이버범죄방지조약의 검토
제8장 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
사이버범죄의 방지를 위한 국제협력방안
형사정책연구
2007 .06
-
犯罪의 國際化와 刑法의 役割
형사정책연구
2002 .09
-
국제범죄 대응을 위한 국제형사경찰기구의 강화방안
법학연구
2005 .06
-
Cyber범죄조약에 대처한 실체법적 대응방안의 모색 : 최근 일본의 하이테크범죄에 대한 입법동향을 검토하며
중앙법학
2005 .02
-
사이버범죄의 주요동향과 형사정책적 과제
형사정책연구
2007 .09
-
중국에서 전쟁범죄에 관한 연구논평
비교형사법연구
2014 .01
-
사이버범죄방지조약에 관한 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2001 .12
-
사이버범죄에 관한 입법동향과 전망
사이버커뮤니케이션학보
2006 .12
-
사이버범죄와 국제형법 : 추상적 위험범의 범죄지 및 형법 제6조의 적용 범위를 중심으로
형사정책연구
2005 .09
-
사이버범죄 대응을 위한 부다페스트협약 가입과 국제공조 연구
경찰학논총
2019 .01
-
통신사기 범죄의 문제에 대한 연구
비교형사법연구
2018 .01
-
사이버범죄에 대한 법인의 형사책임
비교형사법연구
2018 .01
-
국제범죄 색출을 위한 국제공조모델에 관한 연구
사회과학연구
2010 .02
-
사이버범죄의 현황과 대책
동북아법연구
2020 .01
-
The Crime of Aggression in the International Criminal Court : Searching A New Way to Deter and Punish Old Crime
서울국제법연구
2000 .12
-
형사정책연구 30년의 성과와 과제(II) : 형사법 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2019 .03
-
사이버범죄와 대응전략
법학연구
2009 .11
-
中國 刑法上 犯罪過程에서의 犯罪形態
법학연구
2005 .06
-
사이버범죄와 관할
法學論文集
2007 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003835534