지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article is an attempt to reassess the so-called Varga controversy that took place in the Soviet academia in the postwar period through newly available Russian archival documents. From 1947 to 1949, Evgenii Varga, a top Soviet economist and Stalin's economic advisor, was subject to extensive criticism for his "revisionist" ideas on postwar Western economy expressed in the 1946 book entitled Changes in the Economy of Capitalism as a Result of the Second World War. Subsequently, his prominent institute, the Institute of World Economy and World Politics, was disbanded and its authoritative journal ceased to be published. The Controversy has been an important subject for Soviet historians and the Cold War experts as it was believed to reflect Stalin's new course in the impending Cold War. More specifically, the fall of Varga and his institute, according to the previous studies, demonstrates the dictator's ideological hysteria against the Soviet intellectuals and his hard line policy towards the Western world.
Based on previously inaccessible archival materials, the article attempts to revise the previous studies' account by placing the Controversy in a longer time-frame and a broader context. A marked attack on Varga and his institute already existed in early 1941, six years before the Cold War started, and just reemerged in 1943 and 1947. They had not stemmed from clear-cut ideological and theoretical difference between orthodox Leninism and revisionism, but from complicated factors reflecting the context of the Soviet politics, culture and society. The fall of Varga and his institute was not directly connected to their economic theory, which had never been questioned by Stalin. The real source for their fall lay in the nationalistic/chauvinistic sentiments of Andrei Zhdanov and his followers in the Party leadership who had been seriously bothered by the fact that the institute was filled with the old, foreign and Jewish scholars. For the Zhdanovites, these academicians did not deserve to undertake the key tasks for the party-state as they were politically unreliable and not capable of promoting Russian values.
Based on previously inaccessible archival materials, the article attempts to revise the previous studies' account by placing the Controversy in a longer time-frame and a broader context. A marked attack on Varga and his institute already existed in early 1941, six years before the Cold War started, and just reemerged in 1943 and 1947. They had not stemmed from clear-cut ideological and theoretical difference between orthodox Leninism and revisionism, but from complicated factors reflecting the context of the Soviet politics, culture and society. The fall of Varga and his institute was not directly connected to their economic theory, which had never been questioned by Stalin. The real source for their fall lay in the nationalistic/chauvinistic sentiments of Andrei Zhdanov and his followers in the Party leadership who had been seriously bothered by the fact that the institute was filled with the old, foreign and Jewish scholars. For the Zhdanovites, these academicians did not deserve to undertake the key tasks for the party-state as they were politically unreliable and not capable of promoting Russian values.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 1947년 이전
Ⅲ. 1947
Ⅳ. 1947년 이후
Ⅴ. 결론
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (36)
참고문헌 신청
1. [기타자료] - Академия наук в решениях политвюро ЦК РКП(б) / 2000 / БКП(б) – КПСС, 1922-1991
2. [기타자료] - / 2004 / Советско-Американские отношенения, 1945-1948
3. [기타자료] - Варга, Е. / 1946 / Изменения в ёкономике капитализма в итоге второй мировой войны
4. [기타자료] - Вознесенский / 1948 / Военная экономика СССР в период отечественной войны
5. [기타자료] - Каплан / 1991 / Важнейшие совытия международной жизни и деятельности Института мирового хозяйства и мировой политика
2. [기타자료] - / 2004 / Советско-Американские отношенения, 1945-1948
3. [기타자료] - Варга, Е. / 1946 / Изменения в ёкономике капитализма в итоге второй мировой войны
4. [기타자료] - Вознесенский / 1948 / Военная экономика СССР в период отечественной войны
5. [기타자료] - Каплан / 1991 / Важнейшие совытия международной жизни и деятельности Института мирового хозяйства и мировой политика
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
세계경제대공황과 스딸린주의 경제학 담론, 1929~1936 : 바르가를 중심으로
역사교육
2010 .09
-
스탈린 시대에 대한 새로운 해석 — 바르가 연구소를 통해서 본 소비에트 정치 문화 [서평] Kyung Deok Roh (2018), Stalin’s Economic Advisors: The Varga Institute and the Making of Soviet Foreign Policy, London: I.B. Tauris.
인문논총
2020 .01
-
냉전사와 소련 연구
역사비평
2012 .11
-
스탈린 시대 소련의 대외 관계, 1926-1953 : 해석사
슬라브학보
2012 .03
-
스탈린은 왜 한국전쟁을 '허락'했는가? : 새로운 시각
역사학보
2005 .12
-
스탈린 외교를 바라보는 한 시각, 1927~1953
역사비평
2017 .11
-
1949년 1월 국공(國共)평화회담중재에 대한 소련의 태도 및 세계안보전략
역사학보
2009 .06
-
2차 세계대전과 소련정부의 교회정책
슬라브학보
2004 .12
-
북한의 한국전쟁 계획 수립과 소련의 역할
역사와현실
2007 .12
-
Stalin’s Death and the Implications for Ending the Korean War
史叢(사총)
2015 .01
-
소비에트 전쟁문학의 흐름과 사회주의 리얼리즘
외국문학연구
2001 .06
-
냉전 시기 소련-북한의 비대칭동맹과 북한의 자주외교
슬라브硏究
2019 .01
-
러시아/소련 극동지역 한인이주문제에 대한 정치지리학적 고찰(1860-1937)
슬라브학보
2002 .06
-
영토와 영광: 러시아 우주 개발 프로젝트를 중심으로
러시아어문학연구논집
2015 .01
-
제2차 세계대전 시기 소련의 전쟁 포스터에 나타난 여성의 이미지
슬라브학보
2011 .06
-
러시아의 국가폭력과 과거사 청산 노력
신학과 선교
2019 .01
-
한국전쟁과 소련의 역할 -1949년 3월 조소 양국 정부의 협상을 중심으로-
대구사학
2010 .01
-
1950년 1월 애치슨의 프레스클럽 연설과 하나의 전쟁 논리
한국사연구
2002 .12
-
중국의 한국전쟁 참전 : 중국-러시아 자료의 비교를 중심으로
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2000 .06
-
스탈린 종교정책, 1943-1948 : 러시아정교문제위원회 구성과 활동을 중심으로
슬라브학보
2009 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-911-003607115