지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is an object in 1940's to expose the aspect of the nationalism discussion which it pursues through the narration strategy of the history novel at the time. In this paper, we would like to an aspect and meaning of the nationalism discussion will be looked into against ‘King Sejo’〈세조대왕〉 which the change over of the recognition is found as the meaning of a conversion when being the series of the history novel of in 1920’s of it in 1940’s.
The Japanese imperialism requested that the Japanese of the nation Chosun became for the war mobilization in 1940’s. However, it was afraid of that it becomes Japanese in fact. In conclusion, “Naesunilche”(to be one between Japan And Chosun) was the symbol for the war mobilization. Lee Guang-su was accepted “Huanminhwa”(to be national people in japan) and extended his the nationalism discussion and changed. And Lee Guang-su emphasizing the blood with the unitary nation is asserted that the Japanese and blood are identical. The history narration is changed the use of the substitution of the memory and the new nationalism discussion tries to be formed.
‘King Sejo’〈세조대왕〉 is the text showing the change of the nation discussion of Lee Guang-su’s in 1940’s. It contrasts with a dichotomy and an individual is described for the historical probability. As to this, a marginalization is the history of the public a thing as the narration strategy of the history narrative. ‘King Sejo’〈세조대왕〉 reconstructs the memory and it forms the history narrative freshly. The rapport with the Japan nation tried to be drawn in the critical eyes of the descriptor about the Confucian legitimacy.
Lee Guang-su tried to form “Huanminhwa” to the nationalism discussion by the narration strategy of the history narrative and reconfiguration of the memory. However, this is unable to be completely included in the imperialism discussion and shows a “Huanminhwa” discussion and difference. In 1940’s, his history novel was the expression of the desire which tries to draw the Japanized nation. However, the nationalism discussion where it is found in the history narrative remained as the refracted display.
The Japanese imperialism requested that the Japanese of the nation Chosun became for the war mobilization in 1940’s. However, it was afraid of that it becomes Japanese in fact. In conclusion, “Naesunilche”(to be one between Japan And Chosun) was the symbol for the war mobilization. Lee Guang-su was accepted “Huanminhwa”(to be national people in japan) and extended his the nationalism discussion and changed. And Lee Guang-su emphasizing the blood with the unitary nation is asserted that the Japanese and blood are identical. The history narration is changed the use of the substitution of the memory and the new nationalism discussion tries to be formed.
‘King Sejo’〈세조대왕〉 is the text showing the change of the nation discussion of Lee Guang-su’s in 1940’s. It contrasts with a dichotomy and an individual is described for the historical probability. As to this, a marginalization is the history of the public a thing as the narration strategy of the history narrative. ‘King Sejo’〈세조대왕〉 reconstructs the memory and it forms the history narrative freshly. The rapport with the Japan nation tried to be drawn in the critical eyes of the descriptor about the Confucian legitimacy.
Lee Guang-su tried to form “Huanminhwa” to the nationalism discussion by the narration strategy of the history narrative and reconfiguration of the memory. However, this is unable to be completely included in the imperialism discussion and shows a “Huanminhwa” discussion and difference. In 1940’s, his history novel was the expression of the desire which tries to draw the Japanized nation. However, the nationalism discussion where it is found in the history narrative remained as the refracted display.
목차
1. 서론
2. 황민화 담론과 민족의 재편성으로서 역사 내러티브
3. 『세조대왕』의 서사 전략과 민족주의 담론의 양상
4. 1940년대 이광수 역사 담론의 의미와 토포스(topos)적 인식-결론을 대신하여
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (3)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1920년대 이광수의 역사 내러티브와 민족주의 담론의 양상 : 역사 소설 『단종애사』를 중심으로
어문학
2009 .09
-
조선족 극작가 리광수의 희곡에 나타난작가 의식과 공연 기법 연구
한국문학논총
2006 .01
-
역사교육에서 민족주의를 둘러싼 최근 논의 : 당위ㆍ과잉ㆍ폐기의 스펙트럼
역사교육
2005 .09
-
실록 편찬에 나타난 세조 정권의 정당성 추구
韓國史學史學報
2013 .01
-
전근대 국사의 형성과 그 발전
韓國史學史學報
2008 .01
-
세조 어제시 연구
韓國古典硏究
2010 .01
-
이광수 후반기 문학의 민족 담론의 양가성
어문학
2007 .09
-
조선 세조의 지방 巡幸의 정치성
한국사학보
2017 .11
-
포스트모던 역사 이론의 '민족' 논의와 역사교육
역사교육
2002 .09
-
1960년대 세조정변의 영화화와 현실인식 - 이규웅의 <단종애사>, <세조대왕>을 중심으로
세계문학비교연구
2013 .01
-
亂言과 隱居, 세조 정권에 저항하는 대항 기억의 형성
사학연구
2013 .12
-
해방기 소설과 수난의 서사 : 안회남의 ｢불｣과 최정희의 ｢풍류 잽히는 마을｣을 중심으로
한국현대문학연구
2015 .04
-
남북한의 민족주의 역사학
韓國史學史學報
2004 .01
-
역사교육에서의 ‘동북공정’과 민족주의
역사교육
2005 .09
-
Historical Characteristics of Korean Nationalism
Korea Journal
1966 .12
-
韓國 近現代史 敎育에서 民族主義와 近代主體
역사교육
2005 .09
-
世祖의 王位 簒奪 餘波와 端宗 復位運動의 意味
동방한문학
2007 .01
-
조선 세조의 당 태종 통치서에 대한 인식과 통치철학 원용의 리더십
동서철학연구
2019 .01
-
세조의 금강산과 상원사 거둥에서의 신이영응 설화에 대한 검토 －상원사중창과 강원도 거둥을 중심으로
불교학연구
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-810-003643560