개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this thesis is to discuss the concept of insurable interest in life insurance in Anglo-American law, and to examine the possibility if this concept can be brought in Korean legal system.
In Anglo-American law, insurable interest is one of the core elements in life insurance as well as non-life insurance. However, it is a prevalent view in Korea that insurable interest only applies to non-life insurance. The reason behind this is that it is impossible to calculate the value of human life, using loss and profit idea and that life policy is indifferent from any other chattel, thus transferable.
Since the "the existence of the benefit"can be proved in case someone has special relationship with the insured. even if it is difficult to calculate the economic benefit derived from the survival of the insured, it is possible and necessary to prevent the moral hazard in life insurance also by examining the existence of insurable interest. Above argument that assignability of the policy of life insurance should not be restricted can not be the ground for the denial of concept of insurable interest in life insurance either because not all the chose in action is transferable freely. Therefore, it is necessary to adopt the concept of insurable interest in life insurance in Korea to prevent moral hazard and to preserve spirit of insurance as the fence against the risk. Alternatively, it is appropriate to amend current commercial law by adopting the concept of insurable interest in life insurance
Also, insurable interest shall need to exist till the death of the insured. If it is proved that the insurable interest existed at the time of signing the contract and it is interpreted as sufficient to fulfill the element of insurable interest, prevention of moral hazard would not be possible. For the same reason, it is not appropriate to permit to assign the insurance contract to the person who does not possess the insurable interest.
The harmful effect of the viatical settlement is continuously being reported in the United States. Whereas in Korea, only the positive sides of life settlement are being magnified. It seems that the cultural and social differences between the two countries were not taken into account. A careful review is required not to make mistakes where a good idea to promote the interests of the consumers turned out to cause negative effects on the consumers.
In Anglo-American law, insurable interest is one of the core elements in life insurance as well as non-life insurance. However, it is a prevalent view in Korea that insurable interest only applies to non-life insurance. The reason behind this is that it is impossible to calculate the value of human life, using loss and profit idea and that life policy is indifferent from any other chattel, thus transferable.
Since the "the existence of the benefit"can be proved in case someone has special relationship with the insured. even if it is difficult to calculate the economic benefit derived from the survival of the insured, it is possible and necessary to prevent the moral hazard in life insurance also by examining the existence of insurable interest. Above argument that assignability of the policy of life insurance should not be restricted can not be the ground for the denial of concept of insurable interest in life insurance either because not all the chose in action is transferable freely. Therefore, it is necessary to adopt the concept of insurable interest in life insurance in Korea to prevent moral hazard and to preserve spirit of insurance as the fence against the risk. Alternatively, it is appropriate to amend current commercial law by adopting the concept of insurable interest in life insurance
Also, insurable interest shall need to exist till the death of the insured. If it is proved that the insurable interest existed at the time of signing the contract and it is interpreted as sufficient to fulfill the element of insurable interest, prevention of moral hazard would not be possible. For the same reason, it is not appropriate to permit to assign the insurance contract to the person who does not possess the insurable interest.
The harmful effect of the viatical settlement is continuously being reported in the United States. Whereas in Korea, only the positive sides of life settlement are being magnified. It seems that the cultural and social differences between the two countries were not taken into account. A careful review is required not to make mistakes where a good idea to promote the interests of the consumers turned out to cause negative effects on the consumers.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 피보험이익의 개념
Ⅲ. 피보험이익론의 등장배경 및 그 기능
Ⅳ. 생명보험에서의 피보험이익
Ⅴ. 피보험이익의 존재시기
Ⅵ. 피보험이익 관점에서의 생명보험 전매제도의 검토
Ⅶ. 결론
參考文獻
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
생명보험에서의 피보험이익
경영법률
2006 .01
-
생명보험에서의 피보험이익에 관한 소고- 중국과 비교를 중심으로 -
보험법연구
2019 .01
-
영국 보험법 상 피보험이익에 관한 법원칙의 개혁동향 : 손해보험을 중심으로
무역상무연구
2014 .02
-
손해보험계약에서 피보험이익 및 위험과 상법 제644조의 관계
경영법률
2013 .01
-
보험법상 협정가액에 대한 연구
외법논집
2011 .01
-
英國 M.I.A.上의 被保險利益
무역학회지
1992 .05
-
保證保險과 責任保險의 比較硏究
과학기술법연구
2005 .01
-
생명보험계약과 피보험이익의 재검토
보험금융연구
2015 .01
-
부동산 관련 보험과 쟁점 연구
경영법률
2012 .01
-
2009년 改正 中國保險法 一考
법학연구
2009 .12
-
피보험이익과 타보험조항에 관한 연구 : 자동차보험과 산재보험 중심으로
한양법학
2012 .02
-
손해보험사의 장기저축성보험 규제에 관한 소고
경영법률
2011 .01
-
북한의 보험법 연구 - 보험계약 통칙적 내용을 중심으로 -
재산법연구
2012 .01
-
책임보험에 있어서 보험의 목적과 피보험이익에 관한 연구
보험학회지
2012 .01
-
보험업법상 겸영금지원칙에 관한 검토
기업법연구
2006 .12
-
소급보험에 관한 연구 : 해상적하보험을 중심으로
무역상무연구
2011 .05
-
사회보장에서의 도덕적 해이
보건과 복지
2007 .12
-
독일 보험계약법상 초과보험에 관한 연구
기업법연구
2017 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-366-003692366