지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.8
- 수록면
- 374 - 391 (18page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to make research on the party's autonomy principle and the applicable law to the arbitration agreement, the applicable law to the validity of the arbitration agreement, the applicable law to the arbitrability of the arbitration agreement, the applicable law to the contracting ability of the arbitration agreement, and the applicable law to the method of the arbitration agreement.
The validity of an arbitration agreement is crucially important. Generally, the legal principles to be applied are those used in determining the validity of an ordinary commercial contract; indeed, the arbitration agreement will generally be set out in an arbitration clause, which is itself part of an ordinary commercial contract. The arbitration clause is normally governed by the same law as the rest of contract and its validity will be examined under that law.
If no choice of law is made by the parties with respect to the arbitration agreement-which is the stand situation-the validity of the agreement may have to decided under its proper law, or under the law of the place of arbitration, or the law of the place of enforcement.
If the subject matter is not arbitrable, the arbitration agreement remains without effect. The rules determining arbitrability may differ from one country to another, from one legal system to another.
If a party does not have the capacity to enter into the contract, the contract is invalid. The rules determining the capacity of a party are not uniform and they may differ from one country to another, and from one legal system to another.
If a party is lacking capacity to enter into an arbitration agreement, the recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award may be refused at the request of the party against whom it is invoked. This principle is laid down in the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
The validity of an arbitration agreement sometimes also depends on the form in which it is made. Article Ⅱ. 2 of the New York Convention states that the term "agreement in writing" shall include an arbitral clause in a contract or an arbitration agreement, signed by the parties of contained in exchange of letters or telegrams.
The validity of an arbitration agreement is crucially important. Generally, the legal principles to be applied are those used in determining the validity of an ordinary commercial contract; indeed, the arbitration agreement will generally be set out in an arbitration clause, which is itself part of an ordinary commercial contract. The arbitration clause is normally governed by the same law as the rest of contract and its validity will be examined under that law.
If no choice of law is made by the parties with respect to the arbitration agreement-which is the stand situation-the validity of the agreement may have to decided under its proper law, or under the law of the place of arbitration, or the law of the place of enforcement.
If the subject matter is not arbitrable, the arbitration agreement remains without effect. The rules determining arbitrability may differ from one country to another, from one legal system to another.
If a party does not have the capacity to enter into the contract, the contract is invalid. The rules determining the capacity of a party are not uniform and they may differ from one country to another, and from one legal system to another.
If a party is lacking capacity to enter into an arbitration agreement, the recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award may be refused at the request of the party against whom it is invoked. This principle is laid down in the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
The validity of an arbitration agreement sometimes also depends on the form in which it is made. Article Ⅱ. 2 of the New York Convention states that the term "agreement in writing" shall include an arbitral clause in a contract or an arbitration agreement, signed by the parties of contained in exchange of letters or telegrams.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 당사자자치원칙과 중재합의의 준거법
Ⅲ. 중재합의 유효성 판단의 준거법
Ⅳ. 중재합의 대상으로서 중재가능성 판단의 준거법
Ⅴ. 중재합의 체결능력 판단의 준거법
Ⅵ. 중재합의 방식 판단의 준거법
Ⅶ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
국제중재에 있어서 중재합의의 준거법 결정에 관한 연구
중재연구
2005 .01
-
중재합의에 대한 새로운 고찰
중재연구
2013 .01
-
중재계약의 준거법 적용에 관한 연구
문화산업연구
2004 .06
-
CISG and Arbitration Agreements: A Janus-Faced Practice and How to Cope with It
중재연구
2015 .01
-
중국에서의 국제상사중재합의 유효성에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2011 .05
-
국제상사중재합의의 요건과 내용에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2007 .08
-
선택적 중재합의의 유효성에 관한 연구
중재연구
2005 .01
-
중재에 있어서 법원의 역할
무역상무연구
2006 .05
-
중재계약의 법적 효력에 관한 연구
중재연구
2009 .01
-
중재합의시 중재지 결정에 관한 연구
통상정보연구
2010 .12
-
국제상사중재제도의 법적 성질에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2004 .02
-
Who and Which Law Determines the Validity of Arbitration Agreements in China:Practical Dilemma and Possible Way-out
동북아법연구
2012 .01
-
중재합의의 성립 내지 효력에 관한 준거법
중재연구
2006 .01
-
미국중재법과 중재합의
중재연구
2003 .01
-
국제상사중재에 있어서 중재지의 의미
중재연구
2008 .01
-
중국 중재계약의 형식과 내용에 관한 비교법적 고찰
비교법학연구
2003 .09
-
국제투자계약상의 중재조항(Arbitration Clause)의 주요 구성요소에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2008 .05
-
中国国际商事仲裁协议效力认定问题研究
중재연구
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-003162125