지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2000.12
- 수록면
- 851 - 880 (30page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In comedy, there are many conflicting relationships between man and society. Katherina in The Taming of the Shrew, as an individual alienated from her society, resists against the social conventions of Padua. Padua is a hierachical and patriarchal society, but it is confused with some changes in those ideology. Though they say that this play shows subordination of women or marital mastery, we can see some developments in Katherina's language and character. She realizes the duality and ambivalence and uncertainty of the society.
At first, her ignorance and resistance and distaste at the social customs of Padua make her place outside her society. She is angry at her father and sister and the social group. Combat is her chosen defence and she initiates the combat. But her anger shown in her words and actions is so simple and direct and stubborn and violent that her resistance is ignored.
Pudua is not so simple society as she is. It is a bourgeois-mercantile society where money is master and marriage is commerce. Everybody assumes disguises and practises to deceive and takes a new identity, so there are lots of mistakings. Her flat, angry words and actions are contradicted by others, especially by Petruchio.
The sex battle is a pattern of taming. But what Katheina learns during repeated confrontations is that in the contradictory social convention, one has to know about the contradictory society and its duality and how to master it. Patruchio deliberately dislocates her sense of what is true and what seems true and what is real by using contradictory epithets and words and clothes and actions. He assumes familiarity and smothers kindness, showing contrasts of physical violence with the eloquence. With his power over language full of verbal irony and parody, he illuminates the very reality of society full of ambivalence and duality. Watching the resolution of his intrigues, manipulations and politics, she learns what is expected of her, what is needed to control the society.
Finally, she painstakingly gets the adaptibility and adroit balance between uncertainties. She who has never been in league with society makes subtle adjustment in attitude. She moves into the play-world of Petruchio and Padua. Her self-consciousness about the duality in society leads her to the power of discourse. She earns the linguistic exuberance. Some of her earlier languages of revolt and anger disappear. The long speech at the end appears to preach male supremacy in marriage, but Kate doesn't mean what she says. Final monologue displays the ambiguity of belief and the quality of duality. By relating the artificiality and sophistication in Induction to the duality and uncertainty of the main plot, this theme of learning duality is reinforced.
At first, her ignorance and resistance and distaste at the social customs of Padua make her place outside her society. She is angry at her father and sister and the social group. Combat is her chosen defence and she initiates the combat. But her anger shown in her words and actions is so simple and direct and stubborn and violent that her resistance is ignored.
Pudua is not so simple society as she is. It is a bourgeois-mercantile society where money is master and marriage is commerce. Everybody assumes disguises and practises to deceive and takes a new identity, so there are lots of mistakings. Her flat, angry words and actions are contradicted by others, especially by Petruchio.
The sex battle is a pattern of taming. But what Katheina learns during repeated confrontations is that in the contradictory social convention, one has to know about the contradictory society and its duality and how to master it. Patruchio deliberately dislocates her sense of what is true and what seems true and what is real by using contradictory epithets and words and clothes and actions. He assumes familiarity and smothers kindness, showing contrasts of physical violence with the eloquence. With his power over language full of verbal irony and parody, he illuminates the very reality of society full of ambivalence and duality. Watching the resolution of his intrigues, manipulations and politics, she learns what is expected of her, what is needed to control the society.
Finally, she painstakingly gets the adaptibility and adroit balance between uncertainties. She who has never been in league with society makes subtle adjustment in attitude. She moves into the play-world of Petruchio and Padua. Her self-consciousness about the duality in society leads her to the power of discourse. She earns the linguistic exuberance. Some of her earlier languages of revolt and anger disappear. The long speech at the end appears to preach male supremacy in marriage, but Kate doesn't mean what she says. Final monologue displays the ambiguity of belief and the quality of duality. By relating the artificiality and sophistication in Induction to the duality and uncertainty of the main plot, this theme of learning duality is reinforced.
목차
Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 개괄적 논의
Ⅲ.『말괄량이 길들이기』에서의 개인과 사회규범
Ⅳ. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
High Society
Korea Journal
1979 .06
-
케이트는 왜 길들여졌을까? : 『말괄량이 길들이기』에 반영된 여성육체의 통제를 위한 영국 초기현대의성적 담론과 의학
새한영어영문학
2010 .02
-
말괄량이 캐서리나의 수행적 정체성
영어영문학연구
2015 .01
-
『말괄량이 길들이기』: 여성의 사회적 정체성 형성의 작위적 과정
Shakespeare Review
2004 .03
-
“길들이기” 혹은 소통의 강요 : 『말괄량이 길들이기』(The Taming of the Shrew)
Shakespeare Review
2018 .06
-
병영사회에서 경영사회로의 전환 : 문제와 과제
역사비평
2008 .08
-
「지빠귀부리왕」의 동화적 프레임과「말괄량이 길들이기」읽기
Shakespeare Review
2012 .03
-
케이트의 혀 :『말괄량이 길들이기』에 반영된 영국 르네상스 여성의 육체에 대한 과학적 인식과 사회적 담론
Shakespeare Review
2001 .03
-
Early History of Korean Society
Korea Journal
1964 .07
-
One Generation in Korean Society
Korea Journal
1986 .09
-
역할연기를 통해서 본 삶의 연극성 : 『말괄량이 길들이기』(The Taming of the Shrew)를 중심으로
Shakespeare Review
1998 .06
-
The Taming of the Shrew의 사회문화적 고찰 : 서막과 본극과의 관계를 중심으로
Shakespeare Review
1996 .12
-
설창수론 : ‘전인(全人)’의 문학과 의지의 언어
우리문학연구
2016 .07
-
『말괄량이 길들이기』에 대한 바흐찐적 읽기
Shakespeare Review
2000 .12
-
Buddhism and Society : On Buddhist Engagement with Society
Korea Journal
2002 .12
-
Women and Politics in Korean Society
Korea Journal
1987 .10
-
한국어 상 부사의 쌍대성(duality)에 관한 연구 : '이미'와 '아직'을 중심으로
어학연구
1999 .09
-
The World Upside Down in The Taming of the Shrew
Shakespeare Review
1996 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
『말괄량이 길들이기』: 여성의 사회적 정체성 형성의 작위적 과정
권오숙
Shakespeare Review
2004
.03
『말괄량이 길들이기』 : 중세 기사 로맨스와 페트라르크 풍사랑의 바흐친적 패러디
윤희억
Shakespeare Review
2005
.03
탈식민페미니즘으로 읽는 셰익스피어의 『말괄량이 길들이기』
이연자
신영어영문학
2013
.02
샘 테일러와 프랑코 제피렐리의 〈말괄량이 길들이기〉 : 여성 주체를 둘러싼 교섭과 갈등을 중심으로
김희진
Shakespeare Review
2004
.12
기독교적인 관점에서 본 『말괄량이 길들이기』
김병희
신학과 목회
2003
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-003151683