메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국셰익스피어학회 Shakespeare Review Shakespeare Review Vol.36 No.4
발행연도
2000.12
수록면
675 - 691 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Rejecting the traditional view of The Taming of the Shrew as a male chauvinist play, some critics of the play appreciate the independent aspects of Katherina. However, the independence of Katherina should not be overestimated in that it does not seriously challenge the dominant narrative of "taming" in this text. Accordingly, a new frame of interpretation is needed to make the reading more complex and dynamic as well as to save Shakespeare from the slander of male chauvinism. Mikhail M. Bakhtin's narrative theory would be very effective for this.
Bakhtin maintains that there is a constant interaction among utterances and their meanings, all of which have the potential of conditioning other. In The Shrew's case, the dominant narrative of "taming" is conditioned not only by the Induction, but also by the counter-narrative of the "shrews." More specifically, the Induction, being a parody of the proper play, prevents us from taking the dominant narrative seriously. In addition, behind the seemingly dominant narrative of taming, there exist the voices which challenge it, the voices of Bianca and the Widow. Contradicting and even subverting the dominant voice of the play, these voices subsist to the end of the play without being subsumed by the dominant voice. Through this multi-dimensional interaction among the dominant narrative, the Induction, and voices of some female characters, Bakhtinian dialogism is achieved this text

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-003151552