지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In Korea there are no laws or regulations for harbour workers.
The Supreme Court decided that the pertinent labour law can not applied to them, because there are no direct labour contracts between the harbour workers and their employers. So they are not entitled to retirement compensation. In the field of collective bargaining the harbour unions are not recognised as bargaining partners, so the denial of the bargaining process for collective agreements can not be referred to as "unfair labour practice".
The reason why harbour workers are not protected lies in the fact that harbour unions are regarded not as unions but employers because harbour unions distribute working hours and control the loading process. But this situation does infringe on the guarantee of the basic rights of the people which are stipulated by the constitution. It is therfore very necessary to introduce a "protection law for the harbour workers"
As a solution, following alternatives can be offered:
First, the harbour workers cannot be employed as regular workers because of the fluctuation of the working time. It is impossible to predict the working time, so working conditions of the harbour workers can not be decided beforehand. A permanent working system would harm the international competitiveness of the Republic of Korea Some foreign examples can be utilized as models. The Netherlands and the USA introduced a workers pool system. The harbour workers who belong to the worker pool are guaranteed minimum wages and their salary increases with their working hours.
Second, the minimum wage for the harbour workers must be regulated by law. In Belgium the harbour workers can get the minimum wage and extra payment according to the working hour and working accomplishment.
Third, harbour unions have until now the exclusive power to decide the recruitment, operation, dispensation, and supervision. This does not reflect the market demand of the harbour transport company. Furthermore the union shop system of the harbour unions does not comply with the constitution. So the system of the harbour union must be changed.
In America the employer and employee has built the dispatching hall. In this system the union dispatch the harbour workers and the entrepreneur control harbour workers.
The Supreme Court decided that the pertinent labour law can not applied to them, because there are no direct labour contracts between the harbour workers and their employers. So they are not entitled to retirement compensation. In the field of collective bargaining the harbour unions are not recognised as bargaining partners, so the denial of the bargaining process for collective agreements can not be referred to as "unfair labour practice".
The reason why harbour workers are not protected lies in the fact that harbour unions are regarded not as unions but employers because harbour unions distribute working hours and control the loading process. But this situation does infringe on the guarantee of the basic rights of the people which are stipulated by the constitution. It is therfore very necessary to introduce a "protection law for the harbour workers"
As a solution, following alternatives can be offered:
First, the harbour workers cannot be employed as regular workers because of the fluctuation of the working time. It is impossible to predict the working time, so working conditions of the harbour workers can not be decided beforehand. A permanent working system would harm the international competitiveness of the Republic of Korea Some foreign examples can be utilized as models. The Netherlands and the USA introduced a workers pool system. The harbour workers who belong to the worker pool are guaranteed minimum wages and their salary increases with their working hours.
Second, the minimum wage for the harbour workers must be regulated by law. In Belgium the harbour workers can get the minimum wage and extra payment according to the working hour and working accomplishment.
Third, harbour unions have until now the exclusive power to decide the recruitment, operation, dispensation, and supervision. This does not reflect the market demand of the harbour transport company. Furthermore the union shop system of the harbour unions does not comply with the constitution. So the system of the harbour union must be changed.
In America the employer and employee has built the dispatching hall. In this system the union dispatch the harbour workers and the entrepreneur control harbour workers.
목차
【Abstract】
Ⅰ. 외국 항만하역근로자의 작업구조
Ⅱ. 근로조건
Ⅲ. 각국의 특수한 제도
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
지방무역항의 활성화방안에 관한 연구 : 대산항을 중심으로
관세학회지
2006 .05
-
근로자의 건강권
노동법논총
2010 .08
-
부산지역 항내 크루즈 운영 방안에 관한 연구
산업경제연구
1998 .07
-
노동조합법상 근로자 개념 확대와 그 후속문제에 대한 단상
노동법학
2019 .12
-
개정 비정규직 보호법령의 문제점 고찰
노동법논총
2007 .06
-
[특집/민주주의하에서 보호받지 못하는 노동/파견직, 여성 그리고 촉탁직 노동자]노동조합의 불평등 구조와 비정규직 여성노동자 -촉탁직 여성노동자 사례를 중심으로
아세아연구
2004 .09
-
기간제법상 단시간 근로자 보호에 대한 재검토
노동법논총
2017 .04
-
How Did Unions Protect Workers After 1997 Economic Crisis?
한국노사관계학회 학술대회
2002 .11
-
비정규직 문제 해결의 첫단추는 노동기본권 보장으로부터
서강법률논총
2012 .08
-
근로자 경영참여에 관한 법적 검토
노동법포럼
2016 .11
-
전자수리서비스 업종에서의 불법파견 관련 하급심 판례 재검토 : 서울중앙지법 2017. 1. 12 선고, 2013가합53613 판결을 중심으로
노동법논총
2017 .08
-
비정규직 보호법의 문제점과 해결 관점
법과 정책연구
2008 .01
-
단결선택권과 단결하지 아니할 자유를 고려한 단결강제 제도의 모색
노동법학
2020 .03
-
간병인의 근로자성과 노동법적 보호 방안
노동법학
2013 .12
-
노조의 존립ㆍ자주성의 보호와 그 모순
노동법학
2006 .06
-
단시간근로의 입법정책적 과제
노동법포럼
2014 .04
-
노동조합법상 근로자를 판단하는 판례의 기준
노동법학
2019 .12
-
마르크스주의에서 노동자당과 노동조합의 관계
사회과학연구
2013 .12
-
우리나라 헌법상 근로기본권에 관한 연구
외법논집
2005 .01
-
복수노동조합과 단결강제
노동법논총
2011 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-336-003120103