지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.6
- 수록면
- 209 - 232 (24page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Elizabethan England was a transitional age when the dominance of the feudal aristocracy gave its way to that of the commercial bourgeoisie. King Lear represents this change of political power symbolically by means of the plot that Lear and Gloucester are overthrown by Reagan, Goneril, and Edmund. In the new bourgeois ethic, all the traditional bonds of feudal society are broken. Goneril, Reagan and Edmund who typify cynical selfishness, materialism and Machiavellism of rising capitalism break the sacred bonds between parent and children, master and servant, husband and wife. On the contrary, Cordelia, Kent and Fool retain feudal norms of value by practising their unchanged service to Lear after his abdication.
The bond between signifiers and signifieds as well as bonds of human relationship are broken. In this age of social mobility, the Machiavellian use of words is a means of social promotion. For those who regard language as a means of self-fashioning, linguistic signifiers are no more fixed, but free floating signs to be manipulated at their disposition. While Goneril and Reagan "flattered" Lear "like a dog" to obtain his prize, Edmund put linguistic fraud into circulation constantly to take his father's and brother's power and property. Lear and Gloucester with a blind trust in language cannot read the truth of their hypocritical rhetoric and fall into an intolerable tragic situation.
Shakespeare displays his attachment to many conservative feudal values and distaste to bourgeois values such as restless opportunism and acquisitive individualism. However, we can also hear radical critique of the social hierarchy, the typical characteristic of feudal society. Therefore, it is very controversial to decide which of them, feudalism and capitalism Shakespeare prefers to the other. Rather, I would like to look Lear and Gloucester's advocacy of egalitarianism through the redistribution of property as Shakespeare's political outlook.
The bond between signifiers and signifieds as well as bonds of human relationship are broken. In this age of social mobility, the Machiavellian use of words is a means of social promotion. For those who regard language as a means of self-fashioning, linguistic signifiers are no more fixed, but free floating signs to be manipulated at their disposition. While Goneril and Reagan "flattered" Lear "like a dog" to obtain his prize, Edmund put linguistic fraud into circulation constantly to take his father's and brother's power and property. Lear and Gloucester with a blind trust in language cannot read the truth of their hypocritical rhetoric and fall into an intolerable tragic situation.
Shakespeare displays his attachment to many conservative feudal values and distaste to bourgeois values such as restless opportunism and acquisitive individualism. However, we can also hear radical critique of the social hierarchy, the typical characteristic of feudal society. Therefore, it is very controversial to decide which of them, feudalism and capitalism Shakespeare prefers to the other. Rather, I would like to look Lear and Gloucester's advocacy of egalitarianism through the redistribution of property as Shakespeare's political outlook.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 노승희 / 1997 / ‘생산의 거울’ 혹은 르네쌍스 자아 창출의 정치 경제: ꡔ리어왕ꡕ을 중심으로 한 기호학적 비판 / 영어 영문학 43 (2) : 401 ~ 424
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 박우수 / 2000 / King Lear와 분배의 문제: Gerrard Winstanley와의 관계를 중심으로 / 고전 르네상스 영문학 9 : 49 ~ 77
[단행본] - 박지향 / 1998 / 영국사 / 까치
[단행본] - Blank, Paula / 1996 / Broken English: Dialects and the Politics of Language in Renaissance Writings / London & New York: Routledge
[학술지(정기간행물)] - De Grazia, Margreta / 1978 / Shakespeare's view of language: An historical perspective / Shakespeare Quarterly 31 : 374 ~ 388
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 박우수 / 2000 / King Lear와 분배의 문제: Gerrard Winstanley와의 관계를 중심으로 / 고전 르네상스 영문학 9 : 49 ~ 77
[단행본] - 박지향 / 1998 / 영국사 / 까치
[단행본] - Blank, Paula / 1996 / Broken English: Dialects and the Politics of Language in Renaissance Writings / London & New York: Routledge
[학술지(정기간행물)] - De Grazia, Margreta / 1978 / Shakespeare's view of language: An historical perspective / Shakespeare Quarterly 31 : 374 ~ 388
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
글로스터의 인식 과정 : 『리어왕』에 나타난 눈멂과 통찰
Shakespeare Review
2018 .03
-
말과 眞實 : King Lear를 中心으로
Shakespeare Review
1973 .04
-
King Lear에 나타난 non-communication연구
Shakespeare Review
1995 .06
-
선(禪)의 시각에서 본 『리어왕』
영어영문학연구
2015 .01
-
『리어왕』에 나타난 자본주의
Shakespeare Review
2003 .03
-
King Lear의 영적 자아
영어영문학
1992 .05
-
「리어왕」에 나타나는 노인문제
Shakespeare Review
2012 .09
-
The Significance of Some Images of King Lear
Shakespeare Review
1986 .08
-
『리어 왕』(King Lear) : 호기심, 허구 이야기, 그리고 침묵의 기호학
Shakespeare Review
2004 .12
-
King Lear에 나타난 이상주의
Shakespeare Review
1996 .06
-
본드의 리어와 셰익스피어 다시 쓰기
영어영문학연구
2007 .01
-
『리어왕』(King Lear)의 기독교적 해석
영어영문학연구
2004 .01
-
King Lear에 나타난 시간과 의미의 부재
동서문화
1997 .02
-
프로이드와 라깡의 『리어왕』 해석을 경유한 『리어왕』의 ‘수치감’ 읽기
Shakespeare Review
2011 .12
-
『리어왕』의 질서회복
영어영문학연구
2004 .01
-
Appearance and Reality in King Lear
Shakespeare Review
1985 .08
-
The Ontological Vision of Nothing and Realization of the True Self in King Lear
동서비교문학저널
2010 .06
-
어머니, 딸들, 그리고 ‘허스토리’ : 여성연극 그룹의 『리어의 딸들』에 나타난 셰익스피어 비극의 페미니스트 각색에 관한 연구
Shakespeare Review
2005 .12
-
키츠의 시를 통해 보는 『리어왕』: 「다시 한 번 『리어왕』을 읽으려고 앉아서」
영미어문학
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
『리어 왕』(King Lear) : 호기심, 허구 이야기, 그리고 침묵의 기호학
윤희억
Shakespeare Review
2004
.12
『리어왕』에 나타난 자본주의
박효춘
Shakespeare Review
2003
.03
17, 18세기 정치 풍토 속 『리어 왕』 재현 양상에 대한 연구 : 테이트의 『리어 왕』과 배리의 그림을 중심으로 한 고찰
권오숙
Shakespeare Review
2010
.03
King Lear : An Example of Dramatic Juxtaposotion of the Worlds of Romance and Tragedy
Son Dongchul
Shakespeare Review
2001
.09
적자와 서자의 대결 무대 : 『리어왕』을 중심으로
이윤주
Shakespeare Review
2006
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-003078043