메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
송창섭 (경희대학교)
저널정보
한국셰익스피어학회 Shakespeare Review Shakespeare Review Vol.44 No.2
발행연도
2008.6
수록면
237 - 257 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Dealing with the question of friendship, Shakespeare's "Sonnet 29" and the first three famous statements of Analects by Confucius differ from each other: the former, as literature, appears to be obsessed with the pains arising from emotional conflicts, while the latter, as a quasi-philosophical discourse, seems focused solely on ethical spiritual values. Standing alone, each of these two texts looks incomplete, making each of the speakers's ecstatic feeling arising from an imagined meeting with a friend deeply mysterious. Juxtaposed and read together in trans-textual terms, however, the two works shed light upon each other, the silenced part of each being told by the other. Despite a vast difference in time and space, Shakespeare and Confucius's texts are grounded indeed on a strikingly similar idea of friendship. Both of them present the reader with a genuine friendship deriving not so much from identity as from difference between 'I' and the other, the I's otherness enabling the subject to be separated from such 'everydayness' of life as grief, anger, and other bodily desires. The notion of 'otherness' as used in this paper is partly indebted to Emmanuel Levinas. His idea of 'soi(selt)' detached from 'moi(ego)' has been particularly useful, since the psychic state of the soi, a being detached from the moi immersed in the everyday world, is arguably similar to a psychic state in which Shakespeare and Confucius are involved each in one's own unique way: this is the state in which 'I' and the other are able to face each other peacefully, a state hardly possible except in terms of the difference between I and the other. This paper further considers the friendship between Hamlet and Horatio as his ideal other in Hamlet. Hamlet's identification with Horatio is doubtful in its authenticity, since it complicates rather than reveals the substance of Horatio about whose role in Hamlet Shakespeare appears to be strangely undecided.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-002484036