메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
주진만 (상지대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제19권 제2호 (인문 사회과학편)
발행연도
2010.5
수록면
423 - 432 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aimed to divide personality type of middle school soccer players and reveal competitive state anxiety, of which MBTI is a direct variable. Subjects of the study were 201 players of 7 middle school soccer teams in Seoul, Kyung ki areas, registered in the Korea Football Association. The study method used the MBTI (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) and CSAI-2 (Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-z). The material was analyzed using the SPSS version 12.0 statistical package. An one-way ANOVA were carried out to analyze competitive state anxiety, and a significance standard of p<.05. The results were as follows.
Is there a difference in competitive state anxiety of middle school soccer players according to MBTI preference index? Competitive state anxiety according to E-I index showed that extrovert (E) index statistics were higher with a significant difference compared to the introvert (I) index for the physical anxiety factor and confidence factor. Competitive state anxiety according to the S-N index showed that the sensitive (S) index statistics were higher with a significant difference compared to the intuitive (N) index for the awareness anxiety factor. Competitive state anxiety according to the T-F index showed that there was no significant difference between the thinking (T) and feeling (F) indexes for awareness anxiety, physical anxiety and confidence anxiety factors, but the thinking (T) index was higher for all factors. Competitive state anxiety according to the J-P index showed that the judgment (J) index statistics were higher with a significant difference compared to the perspective (P) index for the confidence factor.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-692-002380937