지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article, is how the Koreans accepted and embraced the 『Dae’Myeong-ryul』 law codes regarding the so-called issue of “Yong’eun”(hiding and protecting crimes [of a family member or a relative]), and how such acceptance and embracement contributed to the establishment of a Confucian order regarding familial relationships, in the early half of the Joseon dynasty period. There were two branches in these so-called ‘Yong’eun’ regulations. One was the ‘Chinsok Sang’wi Yong’eun-jo(親屬相爲容隱條)’ clause, which granted a person, who did not report to the authorities a criminal action committed by a member of his family or a relative in the House, the right to not be punished or not receive any harsh punishments. The other was No’yu Bul’goshin-jo(老幼不拷訊條) clause, which dictated that the range of personnel who were granted the status of being unpunishable by the former clause should not be summoned as a witness during the interrogation process.
The policy makers of the Joseon government considered the action of hiding others’ crimes and therefore protecting one's own family members and relatives, as a morally honorable and appropriate thing to do. So, even in the early days of the Joseon dynasty, the Chinsok Sangwi Yong'eun-jo clause began to be applied to criminal cases. And in 1431(13th year of king Sejong's reign), the king ordered that people who were allowed the privilege of practicing the right of “Yong’eun,” should not be summoned as a witness. By ordering so he put the No'yu Bul'goshin-jo clause in clear effect. This order actually caused certain troubles and no doubt created some difficulties for the authorized personnel in doing their jobs, like proving a suspect's guilt or arresting them as well. This was essentially the government's declining to exercise its own privilege of exacting administrative power over the public. The people of the Joseon dynasty shared a social consensus that, even with all such difficulties mentioned before, it was a worthy thing to do in strictly moral terms. And the order of king Sejong was made possible by such social understanding. It maintained a status of law throughout the 15th century.
As we can see, 『Dae’Myeong-ryul』’s Yong’eun regulations were embraced and honored by the Joseon people since the dynasty’s early days, because the covering and protecting the crimes of a family member or a close relative was ultimately more important than maintaining the power of the authorities or pursuing convenience in legal administrations. The government was determined to secure and protect the individual's right to maintain their level of integrity as human beings, so the leaders actively accepted and embraced these regulations and put them to great effect. We can say that their ruling philosophy, which intended to create an ideal Confucian society based upon moral individuals and amicable family relationships, was most effectively reflected in real life institutions and administration.
The policy makers of the Joseon government considered the action of hiding others’ crimes and therefore protecting one's own family members and relatives, as a morally honorable and appropriate thing to do. So, even in the early days of the Joseon dynasty, the Chinsok Sangwi Yong'eun-jo clause began to be applied to criminal cases. And in 1431(13th year of king Sejong's reign), the king ordered that people who were allowed the privilege of practicing the right of “Yong’eun,” should not be summoned as a witness. By ordering so he put the No'yu Bul'goshin-jo clause in clear effect. This order actually caused certain troubles and no doubt created some difficulties for the authorized personnel in doing their jobs, like proving a suspect's guilt or arresting them as well. This was essentially the government's declining to exercise its own privilege of exacting administrative power over the public. The people of the Joseon dynasty shared a social consensus that, even with all such difficulties mentioned before, it was a worthy thing to do in strictly moral terms. And the order of king Sejong was made possible by such social understanding. It maintained a status of law throughout the 15th century.
As we can see, 『Dae’Myeong-ryul』’s Yong’eun regulations were embraced and honored by the Joseon people since the dynasty’s early days, because the covering and protecting the crimes of a family member or a close relative was ultimately more important than maintaining the power of the authorities or pursuing convenience in legal administrations. The government was determined to secure and protect the individual's right to maintain their level of integrity as human beings, so the leaders actively accepted and embraced these regulations and put them to great effect. We can say that their ruling philosophy, which intended to create an ideal Confucian society based upon moral individuals and amicable family relationships, was most effectively reflected in real life institutions and administration.
목차
머리말
1. 『대명률』 친속 용은 규정의 성격
2. 친속 용은 규정의 수용과 적용 실태
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국소설 《西遊記》 번역본의 조선후기 유통에 관한 연구 : 영남대 소장 번역필사본을 중심으로
중국어문논역총간
2017 .01
-
Family System
Korea Journal
1977 .05
-
가족 의사소통에 대한 구성원들의 인식 연구 : 대학생 자녀를 둔 가정을 중심으로
국어교육연구
2015 .06
-
가족사, 가장 오래된 새로운 역사 : 한국 근현대 가족사 연구의 현황과 과제
역사비평
2013 .08
-
조경란 소설에 나타난 가족의 의미 : 『가족의 기원』과 『움직임』을 중심으로
비평문학
2006 .04
-
조선시대의 법과 여성의 몸 : 여성 처벌 규정을 중심으로
역사와실학
2013 .08
-
국내 조선족 범죄의 실제와 방향성
역사비평
2015 .05
-
1945년 이후의 가족의 변화
한국학연구
1988 .10
-
일본의 가족 형태에 대한 연구사적 규명
일본문화연구
2015 .01
-
가족의 회복인가 해체인가? - 카프카의 『변신』과 무라카미 류의 『최후의 가족』에 나타나는 가족문제
세계문학비교연구
2014 .01
-
Embracing and Overcoming of Social Darwinism by Confucian Intellectuals in the Early 20th Century Korea : The Cases of Park Eun-Sik (1859~1925), Jang Ji-Yeon (1864~1921), Lee Sang-Yong (1858~1931), Sin Chae-Ho (1880~1936), and Cho So-Ang (1887~1958)
International Journal of Korean History
2001 .12
-
<용비어천가>의 六祖 서술 양상 고찰
어문연구
2018 .01
-
한국사회의 가족해체와 가족신학의 정립의 필요성
장신논단
2010 .12
-
오래된 미래, 유교의 가족관과 탈현대적 의미
철학논총
2016 .10
-
KOREAN FAMILY SYSTEM
Korea Journal
1961 .11
-
가족이념의 우발적 다원성 : 압축적 근대성과 한국가족
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2001 .06
-
국경이 놓인 오사카 재일한인 여성의 가족과 친족
지방사와 지방문화
2010 .05
-
朝鮮 初期 中國語 通譯 發展 背景에 관한 硏究 －≪朝鮮王朝實錄≫의 記錄을 中心으로－
중국어문학
2015 .01
-
冶隱의 詩‧文을 통해 본 志節과 隱逸에 대한 論辨 -새로 발견된 冶隱의 ｢走和詩｣ 소개를 겸하여
漢字漢文敎育
2011 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002248196