메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김창수 (부경대학교)
저널정보
서울행정학회 한국사회와 행정연구 한국사회와 행정연구 제20권 제4호
발행연도
2010.2
수록면
133 - 162 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Korean society is now on the horns of a dilemma over the degree of development and conservation. The Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs promises to administrate our territory creatively and flexibly so that more spaces are available for needs. The conservers also agree that the size of our territory is quite limited compared to our population and volume of the economy, so we should maximize the productivity of our territory including the use of 4 major rivers in the current society of unlimited global competition. But the conservers criticize the overdevelopment and lack of democratic procedures of the developers. The purpose of this paper is to determine the causes of the policy dilemma between the developers and the conservers for sustainable development over 4 major river restoration project. The efficient or redundant structure and the frame conflict of the governmental departments were examined for policy coordination through check-and-balance system. The disharmony of the surface and deep frame, the conflict of the fast and slow frame and the framing process of the developers and the conservers were also anatomized. The findings were as follows. First, the different structure but same frame between Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs was important cause of the dilemma and unsatisfactory policy result. So the autonomy-based check-and-balance system of governmental structure is good for excluding policy errors and arriving at a consensus. Second, the dilemma between the development-oriented coalition (government and ruling party) and the conservation-oriented coalition(civil society and opposition party) was caused by the government’s top-down and authoritarian policy approach style and the frame difference on the 4 major river restoration project. In conclusion, I suggest that the balanced governmental structure based on redundancy and authentic discourse based on procedural rationality be needed for the consensus building.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 구조와 프레임의 해부
Ⅳ. 정책적 함의 - 합의형성의 가능성
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (62)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-350-002325393