지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to examine the differences of governmental countermeasures depending on the acknowledgement of policy dilemma conditions under the policy dilemma situations. It especially compared the countermeasures of Rho Moo Hyun government with those of Lee Myung Park ' s toward non-regular employment laws. The results were shown that two governments had differential countermeasures when making or amending non-regular employment laws. Rho's government discussed non-regular employment issues in his early official years and succeeded to make them the laws under President Rho's governmental management philosophy and with his powerful leadership. On the other hand, Lee's government has failed to amend them. In the process of amendment, it has finally realized the dilemma of non-regular employment laws. The policies, however, have shown inconsistencies. The major findings of the study based on the results were as follows: First, the governmental policy dilemmas could be led by a governmental management philosophy or social environments. Second, a governmental management philosophy could change roles of labor- management-government. Third, the governmental policy dilemmas could be caused by interest-related groups' effects. Last, the longer we discussed non-regular employment laws, the more the dilemma was reinforced.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (55)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0