메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국제노사이드연구회 제노사이드연구 제노사이드연구 창간호
발행연도
2007.2
수록면
105 - 132 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article examines the Argentine case of coming to terms with the Dirty War from 1976 to 1983, during which period the military junta carried out repressive politics of anti-subversion in an unprecedented manner. Although the Alfonsin government tried to elucidate the Dirty War crimes by establishing CONADEP that would finally submit an official report titled Nunca Mas, it had to negotiate the scope of indictment with the military perpetrators and even accept their impunity, facing with the military revolts. It was not until recently that the Nestor Kirchner administration resumed the Argentine confrontation of the tragic past by groping for a new possibility to investigate the issue of the disappeared and put the perpetrators on trial.
This article also deals with the Tlatelolco massacre in October 1968. The tragic event that killed about 300 resistant students epitomized the bankruptcy of the official ideology of the Mexican Revolution. The massacre occurred at Tlatelolco’s Plazas de Tres Culturas(Plaza of Three Culture) disillusioned general public and enabled them to protest the authoritarian regime. Unfortunately, more than 30 long years passed on without scrutinizing who were responsible for that tragic event and the subsequent Dirty War, and thereafter obstructed justice in Mexico. Although Mexico recently has witnessed recurrence of the controversy surrounding coming to terms with the past, the issue has not attracted widespread attention yet.
In sum, reflecting the their tragic past in Argentina and Mexico indicates that it is a continual and persistent process which often entails acute controversies and tension in a given society regarding the sensitive issues such as the victims and perpetrators, how to recognize the past, and accountability and punishment. Moreover, the process of‘coming to terms with the past’has to include any efforts to remedy trauma inherited from painful pages of the past in order to search for appropriate cultural identities as well as the activities to elucidate the past.

목차

머리말
1. 아르헨티나 ‘추악한 전쟁’(1976~1983)의 청산
2. 최근 아르헨티나의 과거사청산 재론
3. 멕시코의 틀라텔롤코(Tlatelolco) 학살과 ‘추악한 전쟁’에 대한 진상규명
4. 2000년 이후 멕시코의 과거사 논의
맺음말 : ‘추악한 전쟁’의 청산이 주는 교훈
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-392-002319182