개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The government order promulgated by the Enlightenment Party after the Kapsin coup had as its intention the unification of all government organizations into a 6-ministry(6曹) system under which the Uijungbu(議政府) was to become the supreme governing body supervising over these 6 ministries and making important decisions of state. The 6 ministries would then be integrated and subjected to modern management practices. This new governance system. focused on the Uijungbu and 6 ministries, was designed to reform ineffective government organizations. It was also based on the Enlightenment Party's decision to ally itself with the powerful group who ran the Uijungbu.
The Uijungso(議政所) committee. led by the Uijungbu's Daesins and Chamchans, emerged as the main political power that took control of the legislative, administrative, and judicial branches of government during this period of turmoil. This Uijungso committee was founded to strengthen the functions and roles of the Uijungbu, and was a temporary body whose mandate was to manage the state of emergency.
The Enlightenment Party planned to limit the king's power and prevented him from intervening in politics. Yet on the other hand, they also intended to increase the authority of the king in his role as the symbol of an independent state. The Enlightenment Party's plan was for them to grab a share of the power through this Uijungso committee composed of their leaders Kim Ok-kyun and Hong Young-shik and of royal family members from the Daewongun's faction. As such, the Enlightenment Party ostensibly formed an alliance with the Daewongun's faction.
The political structure and governance system established by the Enlightenment Party clearly demonstrates the attitude of those who led the Kapsin coup, that is, their ideological tendency to accept modernized institutions and cultures. However, they strived to partially introduce a governing system based on the Western and Japanese models while maintaining Chosun's traditional governance system consisting of the Uijungbu and 6-ministries.
As such, the political reforms launched by the Enlightenment Party were not intended to establish a completely new order, or to destroy the existing Yangban oriented political system. Not fully accepting the achievements of the Meiji Reformation in Japan, the formulators of the Kapsin reforms focused on achieving modernization within the existing traditional ruling system, a system that protected the vested rights of the ruling class.
The Uijungso(議政所) committee. led by the Uijungbu's Daesins and Chamchans, emerged as the main political power that took control of the legislative, administrative, and judicial branches of government during this period of turmoil. This Uijungso committee was founded to strengthen the functions and roles of the Uijungbu, and was a temporary body whose mandate was to manage the state of emergency.
The Enlightenment Party planned to limit the king's power and prevented him from intervening in politics. Yet on the other hand, they also intended to increase the authority of the king in his role as the symbol of an independent state. The Enlightenment Party's plan was for them to grab a share of the power through this Uijungso committee composed of their leaders Kim Ok-kyun and Hong Young-shik and of royal family members from the Daewongun's faction. As such, the Enlightenment Party ostensibly formed an alliance with the Daewongun's faction.
The political structure and governance system established by the Enlightenment Party clearly demonstrates the attitude of those who led the Kapsin coup, that is, their ideological tendency to accept modernized institutions and cultures. However, they strived to partially introduce a governing system based on the Western and Japanese models while maintaining Chosun's traditional governance system consisting of the Uijungbu and 6-ministries.
As such, the political reforms launched by the Enlightenment Party were not intended to establish a completely new order, or to destroy the existing Yangban oriented political system. Not fully accepting the achievements of the Meiji Reformation in Japan, the formulators of the Kapsin reforms focused on achieving modernization within the existing traditional ruling system, a system that protected the vested rights of the ruling class.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 조선 및 서구의 정치체제와 권력운영 인식
Ⅲ. 의정부 중심의 정치체제와 권력운영 구상
Ⅳ. 맺음말
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
秦代 ‘以吏爲師’와 ‘史’職의 위상
동양사학연구
2020 .09
-
[특집:1884년 정변의 정령 분석] 총론:1884년 정변의 '정령(政令)'에 대하여
역사와현실
1998 .12
-
會社令研究
한국사연구
1984 .06
-
일본의 대외전쟁과 대본영의 운영실태 - 청일, 러일전쟁을 중심으로 -
동양사학연구
2019 .06
-
‘한한령(限韓令)’을 통해 본 중국 대외문화정책의 딜레마
중국문화연구
2017 .08
-
天聖令 營繕令의 사료적 가치와 역주
중국고중세사연구
2015 .05
-
목회란 무엇인가?
신학지남
2019 .06
-
[특집:1884년 정변의 정령 분석] 1884년 정령(政令)의 군제 개혁구상과 성격
역사와현실
1998 .12
-
統一新羅時代의 內視令과 村落支配
역사학보
1997 .03
-
新羅 兵部令考
역사학보
1974 .03
-
酒令을 통해 본 唐代 음주문화
중국고중세사연구
2005 .02
-
新羅律令의 篇目과 그 內容
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
1994 .03
-
濟州道 令監놀이에 대 한 一考察 : 놀이의 形成과 令監의 性格을 中心으로
민속학연구
1994 .08
-
新羅 執事省의 성격과 위상에 대한 再論
신라사학보
2017 .08
-
朝鮮中期 議政府政治活動硏究
대구사학
2010 .01
-
1992~2012년 러시아 정부조직 변화 연구
슬라브학보
2014 .12
-
外交辭令으로서의 中國詩
중어중문학
2007 .12
-
Local Governance and Community Power in Korea
Korea Journal
2006 .12
-
신라 동궁 출토 14면체 酒令 주사위의 명문 해석과 그 의미
동서인문학
2018 .02
-
Political Thought in Korea
Korea Journal
1978 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002269851