메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
행정법이론실무학회 행정법연구 行政法硏究 第25號
발행연도
2009.12
수록면
411 - 433 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article analyzed the rulings of the WTO American Cotton Case which was filed by Brazil regarding the American subsidies for the cotton producers. This case was very important in many aspects. First, most of American payments to the cotton producers proved to be a violation of Agreement on Agriculture(AoA) and Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures(ASCM). This conclusion might give a chance for the developing countries to complain about American subsidies for other crops. Second, this decision made it clear that the subsidies which were paid by the commitment schedule under the AoA could violate ASCM.
Specifically, direct payments and production flexibility contract payments were not classified as green box. And counter-cyclical payments, marketing loan program payments and market loss assistance payments were recognized as amber box payments which caused price suppression in the same market and gave the serious prejudice to the Brazilian interests. User marketing payments(Step-2) were controversial about whether their character was of domestic support or export subsidies. The panel decided they were export subsidies and import substitution subsidies. The export credit guarantee was declared to be red subsidies even if the negotiation process might show that it was non-red subsidy.
Many commentators have criticized this decision, saying it was too loyal to the text and ignored the intents of the negotiators. This could be explained by the fact that WTO agreements are more increasingly being treated as legal texts rather than political agreements.

목차

Ⅰ. 서
Ⅱ. 평결의 분석
Ⅲ. 평결에 대한 평가
Ⅳ. 평결의 한국에 대한 시사점
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-363-002627595