지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Police is one of the most important and essential part of state function. The meaning of police and the scope of police law, however, differ from age to age and from state to state.
Having accepted the Continental legal tradition, Korean police law has a variety of concepts of police, among which the most important is the material concept. Police in the material sense is generally understood as "activities of state which, on the ground of sovereignty, authoritatively command and coerce citizens in order to preserve public safety and order." It is compose of three elements: (1) The objective of police is to preserve public safety and order; (2) The means of police is authoritative command and coercion; and (3) The basis of police power is general sovereignty. Each of these elements, as generally explained, has some defects and nowadays needs to be modified.
More important is that the relevancy of this concept to real working of the police is under doubt. Police in the material sense is regardless of the agency; it refers to the activities any agency who exercises this power. Thus came the distinction of so-called security police, or general police, which means the activities of general police agencies, and so-called administrative police in a narrow sense, or special police, which means the activities to prevent and remove danger by agencies other than general police.
Most Korean administrative law scholars support this wide concept of police comprising both security police and administrative police in a narrow sense. But it is neither appropriate nor necessary to include the latter in police. That should rather be .understood as a part of those areas of administration carried out by the agency. If police law should provide directions and guidelines for police agencies, it is desirable and necessary to understand police in a narrow sense, that is, as only the activities of general police agencies. And accordingly the scope of police law is advisable to be limited to the law pertaining to police in a narrow sense.
Having accepted the Continental legal tradition, Korean police law has a variety of concepts of police, among which the most important is the material concept. Police in the material sense is generally understood as "activities of state which, on the ground of sovereignty, authoritatively command and coerce citizens in order to preserve public safety and order." It is compose of three elements: (1) The objective of police is to preserve public safety and order; (2) The means of police is authoritative command and coercion; and (3) The basis of police power is general sovereignty. Each of these elements, as generally explained, has some defects and nowadays needs to be modified.
More important is that the relevancy of this concept to real working of the police is under doubt. Police in the material sense is regardless of the agency; it refers to the activities any agency who exercises this power. Thus came the distinction of so-called security police, or general police, which means the activities of general police agencies, and so-called administrative police in a narrow sense, or special police, which means the activities to prevent and remove danger by agencies other than general police.
Most Korean administrative law scholars support this wide concept of police comprising both security police and administrative police in a narrow sense. But it is neither appropriate nor necessary to include the latter in police. That should rather be .understood as a part of those areas of administration carried out by the agency. If police law should provide directions and guidelines for police agencies, it is desirable and necessary to understand police in a narrow sense, that is, as only the activities of general police agencies. And accordingly the scope of police law is advisable to be limited to the law pertaining to police in a narrow sense.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 경찰 개념의 역사성과 다양성
Ⅲ. 경찰법의 범위
Ⅳ. 결론
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국 자치경찰제 도입의 쟁점과 개선방안에 관한 연구
사회과학연구
2003 .08
-
한국 자치경찰제의 도입 모형:정부안(홍익표의원 대표발의안) 검토를 중심으로
한국경찰학회보
2019 .01
-
경찰활동에 대한 시민 만족도에의 영향요인
한국치안행정논집
2020 .01
-
자치경찰제 도입모델에 관한 검토- 문재인 정부 하에서의 논의를 중심으로 -
치안정책연구
2018 .01
-
경찰의 태도에 대한 인식이 대학생의 경찰직업 선택에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
경찰학연구
2012 .12
-
장소지향적 경찰활동과 정책적 함의
경찰학연구
2008 .08
-
중국 공안교육제도에 관한 연구-중앙･지방 공안대학의 혁신시도를 중심으로-
경찰학논총
2016 .01
-
한국 지역사회 경찰활동의 활성화 방안에 관한 연구
지역개발연구
2002 .12
-
참여정부 자치경찰제(안)에 대한 비판적 논의 : 설문조사 분석결과를 중심으로
한국사회와 행정연구
2006 .02
-
고객만족형 경찰활동 방안
한국공안행정학회보
2006 .01
-
경찰의 책임수사제와 자치경찰제
법과 정책연구
2005 .01
-
한국경찰체제의 역사적 특성
법학연구
2005 .11
-
경찰공무원의 자기개발에 대한 인식과 경찰인적자원개발 방안
한국공안행정학회보
2007 .01
-
미국의 Team Policing 사례 연구
한국공안행정학회보
2017 .01
-
한국 지역경찰에 있어서 경찰의 주민신뢰가 지역사회경찰활동 수용도에 미치는 영향
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2018 .10
-
자치경찰제 도입방안에 관한 연구
법학연구
2004 .12
-
한국 근대경찰사 小考
한국공안행정학회보
2010 .01
-
경찰개혁: ‘경찰을 경찰답게’ 만들기 위한 경찰조직 재설계
법학논총
2017 .09
-
스마트 폴리싱의 한국적 적용에 대한 연구
치안정책연구
2018 .01
-
한국과 미국 경찰의 사회적 자본 비교를 통한 시사점 검토
경찰학논총
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-363-002627611