지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the field of medical research on humans, the ethics committees have an important role. They ensure the necessary protection of the subjects and contribute to quality assurance in medical research. Opinions of the Committee do not have the force and effect of law and may not be relied upon as an absolute defense to a charge of ethical misconduct. Originally established as an instrument of ethical self-guard in the medical profession, the ethics committee soon advanced to a statutory institution and is now on the way to becoming the body charged with judicial control in medical research. This development implies the need for changes in both position and function of the ethics committee, but these have not been made with due consideration for all the developments there have been.
The existing uncertainties are hampering medical research, which is in the interests of neither the public nor the actual medical research. Owing to the different and obscure legal arguments used, it has not been possible to make any definitive decision on the legal standing of decisions made by ethics committees. It seems obvious that these problems cannot be solved unless the work of ethics committees can be based on a clear and reliable legal basis regulating the judicial nature of the committees' decisions, the composition of the actual committees and the procedures they are to follow in reaching their decisions. With regard to the existing regulations, this might be best achieved by integrating the work of the ethics committees into the approval procedures of an administrative authority.
When a committee member has a conflict of interest in relation to a project under review, or could be seen to have a conflict of interest, that member should withdraw from the meeting.
The existing uncertainties are hampering medical research, which is in the interests of neither the public nor the actual medical research. Owing to the different and obscure legal arguments used, it has not been possible to make any definitive decision on the legal standing of decisions made by ethics committees. It seems obvious that these problems cannot be solved unless the work of ethics committees can be based on a clear and reliable legal basis regulating the judicial nature of the committees' decisions, the composition of the actual committees and the procedures they are to follow in reaching their decisions. With regard to the existing regulations, this might be best achieved by integrating the work of the ethics committees into the approval procedures of an administrative authority.
When a committee member has a conflict of interest in relation to a project under review, or could be seen to have a conflict of interest, that member should withdraw from the meeting.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 윤리위원회의 발달사
Ⅲ. 윤리위원회의 법제
Ⅳ. 독일의 윤리위원회 현황
Ⅴ. 윤리위원회 기능의 변화와 법적인 발달의 필요성
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
연명의료결정법과 임상윤리서비스
생명윤리
2017 .06
-
국가생명윤리심의위원회 구성 및 운영의 개선방안
생명윤리
2006 .06
-
연구･학습윤리에 대한 인지도 분석
디지털융복합연구
2012 .01
-
간호과와 비 간호과 학생의 생명의료윤리 의식 비교
디지털융복합연구
2013 .01
-
줄기세포 연구자의 연구 윤리 일반에 관한 인식 및 절차
생명윤리
2008 .12
-
서울대학교 의과대학의 의료윤리 교육 경험
생명윤리
2004 .12
-
생명의료윤리에 관한 간호연구 분석
생명윤리
2000 .12
-
포스트휴먼 시대의 로봇과 인간의 윤리
한국콘텐츠학회논문지
2018 .03
-
A Study on the Necessity of Professional Ethics Education of Korean Architects- Focusing on Ethics Education of KIRA Education Board -
예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지
2018 .01
-
융합 계열간 대학생의 생명윤리의식과 자아존중감간 상관연구
한국융합학회논문지
2015 .01
-
윤리경영과 기업성과간 기업지배구조의 조절효과
디지털융복합연구
2012 .01
-
경쟁우위 전략에서의 기업윤리에 관한 연구
대한안전경영과학회지
2007 .01
-
윤리는 과학기술발전의 적(敵)인가?
과학기술학연구
2001 .12
-
생명윤리교육의 방향설정을 위한 하나의 自省的 提案
생명윤리
2009 .12
-
조직구성원의 윤리적 행동의 영향요인 및 조직유효성에 미치는 영향
대한산업경영학회지
2009 .01
-
Unions, Health and Safety Committees, and Workplace Accidents in the Korean Manufacturing Sector
Safety and health at work : SH@W
2016 .01
-
환경윤리의 접근 유형과 전개
인문과학연구
1998 .02
-
요양병원 간호사의 윤리적 이슈와 윤리교육 요구조사
한국콘텐츠학회논문지
2018 .06
-
중등 도덕과 생명의료윤리교육에 대한 비판적 검토
생명윤리
2006 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-570-002566970