지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aim of this paper is to analyze the relation's change and character between Korea-Japan in the historical view. We had divided our research scope from four periods that were 1) the era of conflict and struggle, 2) the era of adhesion and dependence, 3) the era of going autonomy up, and 4) the era of driving new partnership within conflict each other.
The policy's character to Japan of each regime in Korea is as follows:
1) Lee regime had used very wel the feeling against Japan for covering his dictatorship. As a result, President lee had strong power and authority, powerful autonomy over the Japan.
2) The relationship between Korea-Japan in the era of president Park is merged in Korea-Japan meeting. He emphasized more economic interests than national feeling in the relation with Japan. As the capital of Japan was penetrating into market of Korea, the relation between Korea-Japan was close to each other very well, so-called, that was an dependency of Korea to Japan.
3) Because Chun and Noh regimes seized political power by force and didn't have a legitimacy in the exercise of political power, they had needed so much approval of U.S.A. that had powerful control to Korea from beginning of nation building. On the contrary, They could have only relative, restricted autonomy to Japan. This autonomy was not equal level, but a degree of negative character.
4) As coming new international order under control of U.S.A. after the 1990, the relation of Korea-Japan begun to be new phase. In this globalization situation, the regime of president Kim(YS) and Kim(DJ) couldn't help going forward toward open and reform policy. The open policy in Korea must be applied to relation with Japan exceptionally. As a result, it has been a partnership between two countries that is not only trouble but also corporational relation, not zero-sum but non zero-sum game.
In conclusion, the change of relation between Korea-Japan was up to their willingness for their political power to maintain and reinforcement. In particular, the political regimes in Korea was made the relation with Japan by virtue of their political purpose, that is, to maintain and reinforcement power. Therefore, each regimes in Korea has been the relation with Japan by way of conflict, opposition, dependency, and cooperation periodically. The present's regime(Kim Dae-jung) is driving the development of the future aiming partnership between two countries extremely.
The policy's character to Japan of each regime in Korea is as follows:
1) Lee regime had used very wel the feeling against Japan for covering his dictatorship. As a result, President lee had strong power and authority, powerful autonomy over the Japan.
2) The relationship between Korea-Japan in the era of president Park is merged in Korea-Japan meeting. He emphasized more economic interests than national feeling in the relation with Japan. As the capital of Japan was penetrating into market of Korea, the relation between Korea-Japan was close to each other very well, so-called, that was an dependency of Korea to Japan.
3) Because Chun and Noh regimes seized political power by force and didn't have a legitimacy in the exercise of political power, they had needed so much approval of U.S.A. that had powerful control to Korea from beginning of nation building. On the contrary, They could have only relative, restricted autonomy to Japan. This autonomy was not equal level, but a degree of negative character.
4) As coming new international order under control of U.S.A. after the 1990, the relation of Korea-Japan begun to be new phase. In this globalization situation, the regime of president Kim(YS) and Kim(DJ) couldn't help going forward toward open and reform policy. The open policy in Korea must be applied to relation with Japan exceptionally. As a result, it has been a partnership between two countries that is not only trouble but also corporational relation, not zero-sum but non zero-sum game.
In conclusion, the change of relation between Korea-Japan was up to their willingness for their political power to maintain and reinforcement. In particular, the political regimes in Korea was made the relation with Japan by virtue of their political purpose, that is, to maintain and reinforcement power. Therefore, each regimes in Korea has been the relation with Japan by way of conflict, opposition, dependency, and cooperation periodically. The present's regime(Kim Dae-jung) is driving the development of the future aiming partnership between two countries extremely.
목차
1. 서언
2. 대립과 갈등기(제1공화국)
3. 유착과 의존기(제3ㆍ4공화국)
4. 자율성 제고기(제5ㆍ6공화국 1기)
5. 갈등 속의 신동자적 관계의 모색기(제6공화국 2기 이후)
6. 결언 : 한ㆍ일관계의 전망
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Korea and Japan
Korea Journal
1967 .08
-
중국 대외관계의 역사적 변화와 한일관계
한국민족문화
2001 .09
-
냉전 후 한일관계의 특징과 과제 : 구조적 요인의 변화를 중심으로
한국민족문화
2001 .09
-
언론을 통해 본 한일협정 인식 50년
역사비평
2015 .05
-
한일관계, 무엇을 할 것인가?
한국여성신학
2019 .06
-
Korean Studies in Japan
Korea Journal
1985 .12
-
Korea’s Political Power in Ancient Japan
Korea Journal
1972 .06
-
韓・日關係의 問題와 對應方法
日本語敎育
2019 .01
-
독도 영유권에 대한 전후 연합국의 영토처리
일본문화학보
2020 .05
-
韓日經濟關係의 3가지 接近모델
일본연구논총
1989 .12
-
Korea-Japan Relations and the History of Science and Technology
Korea Journal
1992 .12
-
Opening of Korea and Her Fall to Japan
Korea Journal
1962 .04
-
Early Historical Relations between Korea and Japan : Some Methodological Issues
Korea Journal
1990 .06
-
Korean Studies Research in Japan
Korea Journal
1992 .06
-
한일협정 후 한국 지식인의 일본 인식
동북아역사논총
2011 .09
-
李鴻章의 대일 인식과 외교책략 : 1870년대를 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2011 .06
-
1959년 이승만 정부의 대일통상중단조치와 미국
역사비평
2016 .05
-
Korea and Japan : Their Roles in the Far East
Korea Journal
1971 .03
-
이병주의 대일인식과 한일협정의 기록
국제언어문학
2019 .12
-
일본 대중문화의 유입과 한일관계
일본문화연구
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-905-001934484