메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Animal Experiment and Deliberation
Recommendations
Search
Questions

동물실험과 심의

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Journal
Korean Philosophical Association Korean Journal of Philosophy Vol.92 KCI Excellent Accredited Journal
Published
2007.8
Pages
231 - 256 (26page)

Usage

DBpia Top 0.5%Percentile based on 2-year
usage in the same subject category.
cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Animal Experiment and Deliberation
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
This article deals with animal experiment in terms of deliberative theory. Firstly, it outlines the arguments for and against animal experiment, and then examines the moral standing of animals in views of Habermas and Rawls who are outstanding theorists in the camp of deliberative democracy. In doing so, we expect that we catch the implicit features of deliberative theory. It is important that animals as well as humans are sentient beings and higher animals have the ability of self-consciousness. Animals should be treated differently from inanimate beings. However, Regan and Singer overemphasize the standing of animals. In reality, it is impossible for us to respect the inherent worth of animals and to put the principle of equal consideration of interests into practice. As Habermas and Rawls see, morality is only the social constructions which humans make for social cooperation. We meet the dilemma around moral motivation, "Why should we be moral?", if we adhere to the principles of Regan and Singer in the extreme.
Animals are not instrumental beings for human and at the same time, it is not wrong of us to discriminate against animals on the ground of species. We should respect animals at the level of which we can secure our survival and the development of our civilization. In this context, we should avoid animal experiment as possible, but it can be justifiable unless we have any alternative. In this case, we should make efforts to reduce the suffering of animals. We agree to 3R principles: reduction, refinement, and replacement.

Contents

【요약문】
1. 연구배경
2. 동물실험 논쟁
3. 하버마스와 동물실험
4. 롤주와 동물
5. 보편주의, 계약주의, 진화론
6. 결론
【참고문헌】
〈Abstract〉

References (21)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-105-018886887