지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to represent linguistic mitigating devices in Russian and to present a framework for a pragmatic analysis of mitigation. Mitigation is defined as a strategy for softening or reducing the strength of a speech act whose effects are unwelcome to the hearer. The negative character of the speech act for the addressee, its being a face-threatening act, is very important parameter of mitigation. So mitigation works in directive speech acts and in assertive speech acts, both in deontic and epistemic modality.
Mitigation works in a multi-layered and multi-dimensional way, affecting a plurality of linguistic levels and interactional dimension. The linguistic mitigating devices are categorized into external and internal modification. The former include if-clauses, pre-sequences, clauses, grounders, the latter include different linguistic levels and various linguistic components. Internal mitigating devices cover three different linguistic levels: morphological-lexical, syntactic, and discourse-pragmatic level. In Russian, there are many different mitigating devices, such as aspect, conditional mood, modal words in morphological-lexical level; verb parentheticals, indirect quotation, indirect question, tag-question, passive structure - in syntactic level; indirect speech act, hints, and discourse ellipses - in discourse-pragmatic level.
Function of mitigating devices can be distinguished according to the abstract component on which mitigation centers. This abstract scope can be gathered around three major focuses: the proposition, illocutionary force, and the deictic origin of the utterance. First, speaker's epistemic commitment to the propositional content weakens the speaker's degree of certainty about proposition. Second, speaker's downgrading of illocutionary force decreases the weight of imposition of directives. Third, speaker's avoidance of deictic origin of utterance, ascribing another source or shifted to another situation, has an effect on indirectness of utterance. By means of mitigation we may express respective, polite attitude towards addressee and we can reach the expected goal of communication. Thus mitigation establishes interpersonal interaction between speaker and hearer, and plays a very important role in various social activities.
Mitigation works in a multi-layered and multi-dimensional way, affecting a plurality of linguistic levels and interactional dimension. The linguistic mitigating devices are categorized into external and internal modification. The former include if-clauses, pre-sequences, clauses, grounders, the latter include different linguistic levels and various linguistic components. Internal mitigating devices cover three different linguistic levels: morphological-lexical, syntactic, and discourse-pragmatic level. In Russian, there are many different mitigating devices, such as aspect, conditional mood, modal words in morphological-lexical level; verb parentheticals, indirect quotation, indirect question, tag-question, passive structure - in syntactic level; indirect speech act, hints, and discourse ellipses - in discourse-pragmatic level.
Function of mitigating devices can be distinguished according to the abstract component on which mitigation centers. This abstract scope can be gathered around three major focuses: the proposition, illocutionary force, and the deictic origin of the utterance. First, speaker's epistemic commitment to the propositional content weakens the speaker's degree of certainty about proposition. Second, speaker's downgrading of illocutionary force decreases the weight of imposition of directives. Third, speaker's avoidance of deictic origin of utterance, ascribing another source or shifted to another situation, has an effect on indirectness of utterance. By means of mitigation we may express respective, polite attitude towards addressee and we can reach the expected goal of communication. Thus mitigation establishes interpersonal interaction between speaker and hearer, and plays a very important role in various social activities.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 완화의 언어학적 이해
Ⅲ. 완화 책략과 언어적 완화장치
Ⅳ. 완화장치의 작용 원리
Ⅴ. 맺는말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이남경 / 2006 / 간접화행과 러시아어 구조-요청화행을 중심으로 / 러시아어문학연구논집 (22) : 209 ~ 236
2. [학위논문] - 이해영 / 1996 / 현대 한국어 활용어미의 의미와 부담 줄이기의 상관성 / 석사 / 이화여자대학교
3. [기타자료] - Васильева О.А. / 2000 / Реализация максим вежливости в английском и русском диалогах. Автореферат. Уфа
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Ермакова О.П. / 1990 / Просьба как речевой акт в русском языке // Potsdamer Forschungen der Padagogischen Hochschule ‘Karl Liebknecht’ / Вып 106 : 21 ~ 42
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Земская Е.А. / 1997 / Категория вежливости: Общие вопросы - национально-культурная специфика русского языка / Zeitschrift fur Slavische Philologie (56) : 272 ~ 301
2. [학위논문] - 이해영 / 1996 / 현대 한국어 활용어미의 의미와 부담 줄이기의 상관성 / 석사 / 이화여자대학교
3. [기타자료] - Васильева О.А. / 2000 / Реализация максим вежливости в английском и русском диалогах. Автореферат. Уфа
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Ермакова О.П. / 1990 / Просьба как речевой акт в русском языке // Potsdamer Forschungen der Padagogischen Hochschule ‘Karl Liebknecht’ / Вып 106 : 21 ~ 42
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Земская Е.А. / 1997 / Категория вежливости: Общие вопросы - национально-культурная специфика русского языка / Zeitschrift fur Slavische Philologie (56) : 272 ~ 301
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국어 교육을 위한 드라마의 간접화행 분석
어문론집
2012 .03
-
Investigating Directives in Korean: Advice and Suggestion
인문언어
2010 .01
-
러시아어 간접화법에 대하여: 직접화법과 자유간접화법과의 비교를 중심으로
러시아어문학연구논집
2006 .01
-
간접화행과 상의 의미와 용법에 대한 분석
언어과학연구
2011 .09
-
한국어 화행 인지의 시간적 처리 과정에 관한 ERP 연구
언어
2020 .06
-
Speech Act Performatives Implied in the Narrative Discourse
영어영문학연구
2010 .01
-
화행과 러시아어의 상: 실험언어학적 연구
러시아어문학연구논집
2015 .01
-
한국어와 영어간 발화행위 표현방식의 차이
담화와인지
2006 .12
-
자연발화 음성 코퍼스에서 발화 속도에 대한 발화 길이의 영향
말소리와 음성과학
2017 .03
-
한국어 지시화행의 체계에 대한 소고
국어국문학
2020 .06
-
청자의도(H-intentions)의 개념화와 방향성 연구 : 가족 담화를 중심으로
어학연구
2015 .12
-
사과행위의 표현 양상
담화와인지
2006 .12
-
양상의 언어 철학적 고찰
언어학
2010 .04
-
Meta-pragmatic Function, Cultural Values and Korean Request Strategies
언어과학연구
2014 .12
-
양상과 공손성 : 거절화행에 나타난 양상의 체면 조절 기능에 관하여
노어노문학
2012 .09
-
Pragmatic Function and Linguistic Form
언어
1996 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-309-018826234