지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Kim Kulim's artistic practice is a kind of deconstruction of meaning which is equivalent to Deconstructivism especially that of Jacques Derrida. The very ground on which he and Deconstructivists meet is that they question the method or process of signification. In other words, they negate the principle of 'identity' itself They doubt the subject identified with the sign, the signifier identified with the signified, and the sample identified with the concept.
As an artist, Kim Kulim performs multiple personas throughout his career. He denies the presence of unique and consistent artist by doing heterogenous works and by appropriating motifs and methods of other artists. That is, the link of identification between the artist-subject and the sign he makes gets loose in his work. The artist-subject is not the subject per se but the "subject-effect" which floats from position to position in the context. He practices Derrida's concept of "nonpresence" or "the death of author" which Roland Barthes declared.
In the textual space, not only the subject but also the sign he makes is not unique and consistent. In Kim Kulim's work, the link between image and its meaning, between the signifier and the signified is denied. That is, one signifier produces different signifieds and one signified is represented by many signifiers. His work and its process of signification could be called as "differance", the term Derrida made to designate the game of different signifiers, which is permanently deferred.
Kim Kulim also loosen the link of identification between the concept of 'art' and its sample. He discloses and denies 'the myth of identification' not only in artist-subject and artwork but also in the categorical concept of 'art'. He calls attention to the frame which defines art as art, and reveals its arbitrariness by blurring the boundary between artwork and ordinary thing, art and life. He works on the frame as a "parergon" which Derrida described as being attached to the "ergon" and also intervening to it If modernists give attention to "ergon", Kim Kulim turns his attention to "parergon" which has been marginalized by modernist concept of art. By that reason he could be called as postmodernist.
In short, he has deconstructed the artist-subject, art work, and the concept of 'art' itself Ironically, this work of deconstruction is constructed and continued by that very act of deconstruction.
As an artist, Kim Kulim performs multiple personas throughout his career. He denies the presence of unique and consistent artist by doing heterogenous works and by appropriating motifs and methods of other artists. That is, the link of identification between the artist-subject and the sign he makes gets loose in his work. The artist-subject is not the subject per se but the "subject-effect" which floats from position to position in the context. He practices Derrida's concept of "nonpresence" or "the death of author" which Roland Barthes declared.
In the textual space, not only the subject but also the sign he makes is not unique and consistent. In Kim Kulim's work, the link between image and its meaning, between the signifier and the signified is denied. That is, one signifier produces different signifieds and one signified is represented by many signifiers. His work and its process of signification could be called as "differance", the term Derrida made to designate the game of different signifiers, which is permanently deferred.
Kim Kulim also loosen the link of identification between the concept of 'art' and its sample. He discloses and denies 'the myth of identification' not only in artist-subject and artwork but also in the categorical concept of 'art'. He calls attention to the frame which defines art as art, and reveals its arbitrariness by blurring the boundary between artwork and ordinary thing, art and life. He works on the frame as a "parergon" which Derrida described as being attached to the "ergon" and also intervening to it If modernists give attention to "ergon", Kim Kulim turns his attention to "parergon" which has been marginalized by modernist concept of art. By that reason he could be called as postmodernist.
In short, he has deconstructed the artist-subject, art work, and the concept of 'art' itself Ironically, this work of deconstruction is constructed and continued by that very act of deconstruction.
목차
1. 들어가는 글
2. 예술가 주체의 죽음
3. 차연의 게임
4. 파레르곤으로서의 ‘예술’
5. 나오는 글
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
그리드를 넘어서 : 모더니즘 이후의 ‘아이콘(icon)’
미술사학
2001 .08
-
‘움직이는 조각’과 공연예술
서양미술사학회논문집
1990 .12
-
무용과 과학기술을 융합한 그룹 E.A.T.에 관한 연구
무용예술학연구
2019 .01
-
미술과 공예 : 그 경계와 위상
미술사학
2007 .08
-
1950년대의 한국미술(1), 제1공화국 미술의 태동과 진통
미술사논단
2015 .06
-
미술비평의 효용성에 대해 다시 묻는다 : 아서 단토의 ‘미술종말론’에 대한 비평적 독서
현대미술학 논문집
2006 .12
-
노마디즘 공간적 특성을 적용한 미술대학 공간계획에 관한 연구
한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집
2019 .11
-
현대미술 감상 및 표현수업 지도방안 연구 - 실험적 관점에 의한 7가지 방법론을 중심으로 -
조형교육
2009 .01
-
기야 이방운의 《정미년(丁未年) 사계산수도첩(四季山水圖帖)》 연구
미술사와 문화유산
2016 .02
-
Glocalization 시대의 현대미술
현대미술학 논문집
2006 .12
-
미술사 교육의 전통과 담론들 : 미술관, 미술사, 그리고 교육
미술사학
2004 .08
-
미학의 시대에서 비평의 시대로 : 아서 단토에 있어서 거대 내러티브의 종말과 그 이후의 미술
현대미술학 논문집
2006 .12
-
지역 미술과 권력
미술이론과 현장
2005 .01
-
1960년대 이후 한국 현대미술에 관한 사회학적 논의 : 브르디외(Pierre Bourdieu)의 ‘자본’ 개념을 활용한 사회구조적 분석
미술사연구
2009 .12
-
모두를 위한 엘리트주의 : 공동체적 가치의 담론 장場으로서 미술비평
현대미술학 논문집
2009 .12
-
해체주의를 응용한 메이크업 일러스트레이션
한국의류학회지
2005 .01
-
예술과 경제
현대미술학 논문집
2009 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-560-018685449