지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Position of Magritte in the modernist art history is very ambiguous. If the 20th Century art contributed art history by way of stylistic innovation, Magritte' works always remained in the 'old fashioned' space of illusionistic rendering. Modernist art overthrew the ideal of painting as window, rejected any status as a 'medium', and finally arrived at the point where art becomes the thing in itself. Perhaps Magritte walked the same road, but his method was not reductional.
This study mainly deals with the ideas of 'inside' and 'outside' in Magritte' Paintings..
The idea of 'inside' and 'outside' corresponds with the concept of 'words and image', of 'mind and world', and of 'reality and representation'. What is crucial in this dual system is his conviction that canvas should lie in between these two opposites. For Magritte, the purpose of painting is not merely to describe the visible, but to evoke what is invisible within that visible. For him, the differences between images and language were not merely stylistic matters.
Magritte concerned not only with the perceptual field but also with the linguistic area of representations as such. The most demonstrative example is his 〈This is not a pipe〉 series. Here, Magritte let us pay attention to the rupture between the vision and language. There is the strong interaction of picture and text which reciprocally deny each other, and finally point at the paradox of representation as such.
Andre Breton, who was a leader of the surrealist movement, said that the goal of surrealism is the synthesis of perception and representation. The representative aesthetic of surrealism, the concept of Convulsive Beauty is something that happens contiguously without any preparation or expectation. There lies the paradox that how a sign, any kind of sign could be both sign and object, a reality constituted as sign, an absence transformed into presence.
Magritte says that there is no ultimate signification not only in painting, but also in any representation as such. Because we never know what mind is, what mind know, what mind know when it knows something. For Magritte, painting is a kind of hole, blind area where the inside and the outside, the container and the contained, style and content, words and image merge into a new reality, the experience of which is always convulsive.
This study mainly deals with the ideas of 'inside' and 'outside' in Magritte' Paintings..
The idea of 'inside' and 'outside' corresponds with the concept of 'words and image', of 'mind and world', and of 'reality and representation'. What is crucial in this dual system is his conviction that canvas should lie in between these two opposites. For Magritte, the purpose of painting is not merely to describe the visible, but to evoke what is invisible within that visible. For him, the differences between images and language were not merely stylistic matters.
Magritte concerned not only with the perceptual field but also with the linguistic area of representations as such. The most demonstrative example is his 〈This is not a pipe〉 series. Here, Magritte let us pay attention to the rupture between the vision and language. There is the strong interaction of picture and text which reciprocally deny each other, and finally point at the paradox of representation as such.
Andre Breton, who was a leader of the surrealist movement, said that the goal of surrealism is the synthesis of perception and representation. The representative aesthetic of surrealism, the concept of Convulsive Beauty is something that happens contiguously without any preparation or expectation. There lies the paradox that how a sign, any kind of sign could be both sign and object, a reality constituted as sign, an absence transformed into presence.
Magritte says that there is no ultimate signification not only in painting, but also in any representation as such. Because we never know what mind is, what mind know, what mind know when it knows something. For Magritte, painting is a kind of hole, blind area where the inside and the outside, the container and the contained, style and content, words and image merge into a new reality, the experience of which is always convulsive.
목차
Ⅰ. 어떤 권태
Ⅱ. 안과 바깥
Ⅲ. 말과 이미지
Ⅳ. 시각의 야만성
Ⅴ. 말의 용도 : 쓰기와 그리기
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
르네 마그리트 회화에 있어서의 `역설` 연구
현대미술사연구
1993 .03
-
마그리트 회화와 라캉의 주체론 - 응시, 세계와의 조우
미술이론과 현장
2007 .01
-
현대 실내공간에 나타나는 데페이즈망의 기법에 관한 연구
한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집
2015 .05
-
현대복식에 응용된 초현실주의적 표현방법 고찰(I) -1989~1994년 복식을 중심으로-
한국의류학회지
1995 .01
-
현대 건축공간에 나타나는 데페이즈망 특성에 관한 연구 : 르네 마그리트를 중심으로
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2009 .12
-
크로마키 기법으로 제작된 뮤직비디오의 초현실주의 콜라주 양상
애니메이션연구
2015 .12
-
르네 마그리트 회화의 영향을 받은 포스터 일러스트레이션에 관한 연구
한국디자인포럼
2007 .01
-
현대 시각예술에서 재현의 의미기능
조형예술학연구
2002 .01
-
Communication 수단으로써의 공공 Sign에 관한 연구
한국디자인학회 국제학술대회 논문집
2003 .11
-
오브제의 기호학적 해석 : 마르셀 브로타에스(Marcel Broodthaers)의 작품을 중심으로
서양미술사학회논문집
2000 .12
-
초현실주의 회화에 나타난 광증의 변용적 수용에 관한 연구
서양미술사학회논문집
2009 .08
-
도시철도 사인시스템 디자인 연구: 국내외 사인 중심으로
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2020 .06
-
이미지 속에서 살아남다? 초상화에서의 삶과 죽음
미술이론과 현장
2013 .01
-
도상기호와 대상 사이의 인지적 공간압축에 관한 연구
한국디자인문화학회지
2011 .06
-
Understanding the Complexities of Design Representation
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2013 .12
-
2차원 회화작품이 3차원 영상으로 구현되어 창작된 참여예술에 대한 연구
Archives of Design Research
2001 .08
-
디지털 이미지에서의 재현, 비재현의 문제
현대미술학 논문집
2017 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-560-018683283