메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
행정법이론실무학회 행정법연구 行政法硏究 第23號
발행연도
2009.4
수록면
109 - 135 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Recent Conflict between building occupants and the police led to fatal accident in which many people were injured. The people composed of lessees of commercial stores opposed to the demolition and demanded just compensation. This is because lessees only have a claim to a lessor and cannot maintain their business if the building is demolished. From the legal perspective, this is also because the detail and procedure of compensation for lessees's loss in compensation act are not regulated definitely.
This article is intended to define just compensation for lessee's loss and to find a solution to this problem.
The Constitution permits condemnation for public use and orders to provide statutory compensation and that should be just compensation. Therefore The Land Expropriation and Compensation Law was established as a general law
Compensation for the stabilization of livelihood is beyond the scope of compensation for typical property rights. Compensation includes house moving expenses, loss in business and measures in moving. the concept is designed to compensate for expropriated living rights and is based on property rights or a living right worthy of man(The Constitution art. 23 and 34).
In public works, lessees who can be compensated for their loss are grouped into house lessees and commercial store lessees. Compensation for the stabilization of lessee's livelihood includes house moving expense for house lessee, special supply of an national rental house. and compensation for commercial store lessee. However, there is no clause on a compensation for a premium for occupancy or a special supply of commercial store. Moreover, a compensation for the cost of equipment is insufficient.
In redevelopment project, compensation clause for a lessee from a member of an redevelopment association should be applied commonly to a general lessee infringed on his property right. And when a compensation for a lessee is an issue of the lawsuit in eviction suit, courts need to rule that main conrtactor can expropriate his property and must make just compensation for the lessee at one time.

목차

Ⅰ. 재개발사업의 의의와 철거제도
Ⅱ. 보상법의 체계와 생활권보상
Ⅲ. 세입자보상의 의의와 내용
Ⅳ. 명도소송과 세입자보상
Ⅴ. 정비사업과 철거제도
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-363-001995258