지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This dissertation is a study of the similes, with a view to identifying the limits the existing view of the similes imposed on them and to presenting a new view of the similes on the basis of that identification.
Not by unreliable, abstract theorizing but by examining ways and effects similes work in actual poems and by closely analyzing the similes in everyday life, this dissertation advances a new theory of the similes.
Although they have long been recognized as a major rhetoric device, few in-depth studies of the similes have been made, Ever since Poetics and Rhetoric by Aristotle(BC 384~322), the study on the similes has been relegated to a part of the study of metaphors.
After presenting the existing general views of the similes that 1) effects of the similes are clear and simple and the similes reinforce clarity and concreteness through enhanced imagery, 2) the similes are a lower rhetoric compared with the metaphors and, while the similes are primary expressions with less density, the metaphors are more refined expressions of higher level and 3) the similes and the metaphors are essentially the same and the former are amplification of the latter and the latter is a condensation of the former and, therefore, the former may be replaced with the later, this dissertation raised questions and sought to resolve them.
This dissertation examined if the traditional view that the similes can be replaced with metaphors was true. Common similes in daily life and in the poems of Ki Hyungdo, Ryu Siwha and Kim Dongmyung have been extensively examined. As a result of this examination, it has been confirmed that meanings are changed when similes are replaced with metaphors. Because of the contrasting nature of the similes and the metaphors, such as vector (directionality) and naming (interpretation), and participation and possession, the similes can hardly be replaced with the metaphors. This experiment, in which the similes were replaced with metaphors, showed that poetic narrators' vectors have been lost and the poems were transformed into totally different ones.
The similes induce the hearer to participate in the speaker's directionality. So the similes are persuasive.
Through the study conducted in this dissertation it was found that the existing view that the similes are lower rhetoric compared with the metaphors was not correct. If the similes are considered lower rhetoric than the metaphors, simile-dominated poems would be of lower quality and, in order to upgrade the quality, the similes would be replaced with metaphors. However, there are many examples of good poems where the similes are main rhetoric and where the similes can not be replaced with the metaphors without changing the poems into different poems. What contributes to the making of good poems is not whether similes or metaphors are used but if they are used appropriately.
Through many illustrations and evidence-based study, this dissertation establishes a new view of the similes and attains an in-depth understanding of poetry.
Not by unreliable, abstract theorizing but by examining ways and effects similes work in actual poems and by closely analyzing the similes in everyday life, this dissertation advances a new theory of the similes.
Although they have long been recognized as a major rhetoric device, few in-depth studies of the similes have been made, Ever since Poetics and Rhetoric by Aristotle(BC 384~322), the study on the similes has been relegated to a part of the study of metaphors.
After presenting the existing general views of the similes that 1) effects of the similes are clear and simple and the similes reinforce clarity and concreteness through enhanced imagery, 2) the similes are a lower rhetoric compared with the metaphors and, while the similes are primary expressions with less density, the metaphors are more refined expressions of higher level and 3) the similes and the metaphors are essentially the same and the former are amplification of the latter and the latter is a condensation of the former and, therefore, the former may be replaced with the later, this dissertation raised questions and sought to resolve them.
This dissertation examined if the traditional view that the similes can be replaced with metaphors was true. Common similes in daily life and in the poems of Ki Hyungdo, Ryu Siwha and Kim Dongmyung have been extensively examined. As a result of this examination, it has been confirmed that meanings are changed when similes are replaced with metaphors. Because of the contrasting nature of the similes and the metaphors, such as vector (directionality) and naming (interpretation), and participation and possession, the similes can hardly be replaced with the metaphors. This experiment, in which the similes were replaced with metaphors, showed that poetic narrators' vectors have been lost and the poems were transformed into totally different ones.
The similes induce the hearer to participate in the speaker's directionality. So the similes are persuasive.
Through the study conducted in this dissertation it was found that the existing view that the similes are lower rhetoric compared with the metaphors was not correct. If the similes are considered lower rhetoric than the metaphors, simile-dominated poems would be of lower quality and, in order to upgrade the quality, the similes would be replaced with metaphors. However, there are many examples of good poems where the similes are main rhetoric and where the similes can not be replaced with the metaphors without changing the poems into different poems. What contributes to the making of good poems is not whether similes or metaphors are used but if they are used appropriately.
Through many illustrations and evidence-based study, this dissertation establishes a new view of the similes and attains an in-depth understanding of poetry.
목차
1. 서론 - 연구사 검토 및 문제 제기
2. 직유를 왜 쓰는가
3. 직유와 은유의 차이
4. 직유와 은유는 서로 대체할 수 있는가
5. 직유 : 설득의 수사학
6. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A Feature-Based Analysis of Similes and Metaphors in Metaphor Theory
담화와인지
2019 .02
-
‘같은’ 수식 명사구 구문에 나타난 직유 분석
언어
2019 .12
-
A Survey of Similes in the Bible
새한영어영문학
1978 .03
-
Metaphor or Simile : Why Not Simplify Our Language and Eliminate One?
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2003 .06
-
Categorization and the Distinction of Metaphor and Simile
언어과학연구
2003 .09
-
조선어직유표현에 대한 일고찰
중국조선어문
2009 .03
-
Verb-derived Simile Markers in Korean : A Grammaticalization Perspective
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2016 .11
-
Korean Noun-Derived Simile Markers
언어과학연구
2019 .09
-
불교경전『금강경(金剛經)』,『천수경(千手經)』의한국어 번역에 나타난 직유 표현 연구
통번역교육연구
2015 .01
-
영한 영화자막에 나타난 은유번역에 관한 연구
통번역교육연구
2013 .01
-
Delinking and Revaluing for Metaphors
영어학연구
2017 .01
-
Русские и корейские устойчивые сравнения в сопоставительном аспекте
노어노문학
2014 .12
-
꽃과 여인, 그 직유와 은유 : 이효석과 프루스트를 중심으로
현대소설연구
2003 .12
-
중ㆍ근대 국어의 직유 표현
한글
2005 .06
-
Revisiting Figurative Speech and Tandem-based Translation Courses: A Simile Case Study
통번역교육연구
2019 .01
-
Устойчивые сравнения русского языка в сопоставлении с корейскими (на примере фразеосемантического поля «Умственные способности»)
슬라브硏究
2011 .01
-
깔리다싸(Kālidāsa)의 서정시에 나타난 비유 고찰_인도철학적인 의미를 중심으로
인도철학
2010 .01
-
은유 개념의 허상과 실상
문학교육학
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-802-018424714