메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
강원대학교 비교법학연구소 강원법학 江原法學 제20권
발행연도
2005.6
수록면
387 - 421 (35page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Envirorunental issue is directly related to worldwide survival and one of the most difficult problem in these modernized society.
As long as there have been people and communities, conflicts exist in every time and anywhere.Cfhis paper uses conflict and dispute as a same rneaning.) But methods for resolving disputes have been developed, ranging from mediation to the highly technical rule systems of our litigation.
Envirorunental conflicts are often caused by an NIMBY between development and preservation. Also, Envirorunental conflicts have litigious limitations in resolving collisions which are very complicated.
In recent years, interest in ADR(Altemative Dispute Resolution} has grown from various angles. ADR is both the oldest and some of the newest way of resolving conflicts that have legal implications. ADR is a system to settle disputes without having to pursue a judgment through the courts.
Currently major countries, including the USA, have developed and contrived to activate ADR in order to both choose effective means for dispute resolution and establish the reformation of the judicial system. For example, the USA passed the ADRA for ADR in 1998, Germany revised EGZPO in 1999. Also, Japan passed the law which is related to ADR in 2004.
Not only ADR forms such as negotiation, settlement, conciliation, mediation and arbitration but also diverse forms of ADR such as fact-finding, mini-trial, early neutral evaluation are adopted in the US as the method of dispute resolution.
ADR is available to resolve a wide range of disputes, but have the defects of its Qualities. One specific method is not suitable for all kinds of disputes. In selecting a method, several factors have to be prudently considered after closely reviewing the matter.
The most important factor is to make people aware of the fact that ADR has many merits such as a low-cost, smooth agreement, speedy resolution, etc. It was confirmed that the resolution of disputes by formal proceedings is no longer the rational method.
In this respect, ADR may well be regarded as the most efficient method to resolve Environmental disputes.
When we consider recent worldwide trend, it is desirable that the Relation Law on ADR should be enacted in Korea. In this case, it is necessary to include the provisions of binding force on ADR result.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 환경분쟁의 개관
Ⅲ. 각국의 ADR제도
Ⅳ. ADR의 내용과 평가
Ⅴ. ADR에 의한 환경분쟁해결
Ⅵ. 결론
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018390969