메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
원광대학교 법학연구소 원광법학 원광법학 제26권 제3호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
307 - 342 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to any means of settling disputes outside of the courtroom. ADR typically includes early neutral evaluation, negotiation, conciliation, mediation, and arbitration(Arbitration and mediation are the two major forms of ADR). As burgeoning court queues,rising costs of litigation, and time delays continue to plague litigants, more states have begun experimenting with ADR programs. Some of these programs are voluntary; others are mandatory. Japanese law has long provided for kinds of conciliation or settlement. However, when reintroduced under a new name, “alternative dispute resolution,” this tradition is now seen as an innovation based on foreign models. The diffusion of ADR is one of the central issues for Japan’s judicial reform since the late 1990s, and new ADR law was enacted in 2007. Despite its concept of “alternative justice,” ADR has been controlled by the legal establishment, the Ministry of Justice and the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, in particular. The legal establishment has successfully established and maintained jurisdictional barriers at the legal filed in Japan. Similarly, the legal establishment is getting to dominate the new ADR field as well. The regulations introduced by the legal establishment have become obstacles hindering non-lawyers’ entry to the ADR market. Consequently,most of certified ADR providers are operated by local bar associations. Unlike the United States, non-lawyers in Japan are not successful in professionalizing themselves as ADR experts.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0