지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study`s aims are to study therapeutic justice model, which is being developed by therapeutic jurisprudence and problem-solving courts, as a model for criminal justice reform in Korea.
Therapeutic jurisprudence suggests that these positive and negative consequences be studied with the tools of the behavioral sciences, and that law be reformed to minimize anti-therapeutic consequences and to facilitate achievement of therapeutic ones.
Problem-solving courts(drug court, mental health courts, domestic violence court, community court) focus on solving the underlying problems of offenders, victims or communities.
In criminal sentencing, therapeutic justice propose reforms in the role of judges in criminal proceedings. Moreover, for the judicial reform, the orientation of therapeutic justice can be considered. Problem-solving courts would be in question as a specialized court for realizing the idea of therapeutic jurisprudence in the process of criminal justice. Those programmes of problem-solving court are mainly implemented in the US, and the practice of drug court and civil commitment for sex offenders are worth researching.
This article also review the possibility of their introduction into Korean court system, particularly focusing on the debate about the philosophy and legal doctrine of problem-solving courts.
Therapeutic jurisprudence suggests that these positive and negative consequences be studied with the tools of the behavioral sciences, and that law be reformed to minimize anti-therapeutic consequences and to facilitate achievement of therapeutic ones.
Problem-solving courts(drug court, mental health courts, domestic violence court, community court) focus on solving the underlying problems of offenders, victims or communities.
In criminal sentencing, therapeutic justice propose reforms in the role of judges in criminal proceedings. Moreover, for the judicial reform, the orientation of therapeutic justice can be considered. Problem-solving courts would be in question as a specialized court for realizing the idea of therapeutic jurisprudence in the process of criminal justice. Those programmes of problem-solving court are mainly implemented in the US, and the practice of drug court and civil commitment for sex offenders are worth researching.
This article also review the possibility of their introduction into Korean court system, particularly focusing on the debate about the philosophy and legal doctrine of problem-solving courts.
목차
Ⅰ. 시작하며
Ⅱ. 치료적 사법이념과 그 실현
Ⅲ. 우리나라의 치료프로그램의 내용과 평가
Ⅳ. 치료적 사법의 도입을 위한 제도적 정비방안
Ⅴ. 마치며
[참고문헌]
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (40)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-002484131