지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study starts from the recognition that the current attempts at the memory and commemoration of the past wars involving Korea, Japan and China are very much imbued with mutually conflicting factors. We begin by analyzing how the three nations have been remembering or commemorating the impacts of both the First Sino-Japanese War, in which Japan invaded China and Korea, and the Mongol Invasions of Japan, in which the allied Koyro-Mongol forces made inroads into Japan.
The first thing to notice is that the ways the three nations remember and commemorate the wars are drastically different from each other. As for the Sino-Japanese War, both Korea and Japan have tried to obliterate the relics of the past, while China has tried to summon them. As for the Mongolian Invasion of Japan, however, Japan in Meiji era made an extensive effort to call back the memory of the war, while China and Korea have tried to take the opposite direction.
Despite these apparent differences in their approach to the wars among the three nations, however, we find that there lies considerable commonality, or even interdependence. The commonness comes from the fact that, even when they go different directions accepting only the favorable past memories of the defeats, victories, or oblivion, their views are all based on some sort of patriotism or nationalism. Unless we take some strongly constructive actions against these trends, it appears that the vicious circle of the past history can too easily be revived, turning the prosperity, or reconstruction, of a nation into the misery and oppression of the others.
As a way out of these conflicting situation, this paper present various programs that have been proposed in many non-Asian countries, which include The Trans-Boundary Peace Park, An Inquiry into Ideas of Peace as a Supra-identity of the Gallipoli Project in Turkey. This paper even suggest that the historic sites of a war that involve all three nations should be connected as a common Peace belt and that we should try to look squarely into the past and have lively communications, ultimately breaking off the wars of ill-conceived memories and turning them into of peace.
The first thing to notice is that the ways the three nations remember and commemorate the wars are drastically different from each other. As for the Sino-Japanese War, both Korea and Japan have tried to obliterate the relics of the past, while China has tried to summon them. As for the Mongolian Invasion of Japan, however, Japan in Meiji era made an extensive effort to call back the memory of the war, while China and Korea have tried to take the opposite direction.
Despite these apparent differences in their approach to the wars among the three nations, however, we find that there lies considerable commonality, or even interdependence. The commonness comes from the fact that, even when they go different directions accepting only the favorable past memories of the defeats, victories, or oblivion, their views are all based on some sort of patriotism or nationalism. Unless we take some strongly constructive actions against these trends, it appears that the vicious circle of the past history can too easily be revived, turning the prosperity, or reconstruction, of a nation into the misery and oppression of the others.
As a way out of these conflicting situation, this paper present various programs that have been proposed in many non-Asian countries, which include The Trans-Boundary Peace Park, An Inquiry into Ideas of Peace as a Supra-identity of the Gallipoli Project in Turkey. This paper even suggest that the historic sites of a war that involve all three nations should be connected as a common Peace belt and that we should try to look squarely into the past and have lively communications, ultimately breaking off the wars of ill-conceived memories and turning them into of peace.
목차
문제의 제기
1. 정면(正面): 청일전쟁의 기억과 기념
2. 반면(反面): 여원 연합군의 일본 침공 기억
3. 타산지석: 새로운 기억의 창조를 위하여
나오며
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
전쟁 기억과 전후 중일외교의 중층구조 - 전쟁종료문제의 인식과 해석의 어긋남 -
日本思想
2013 .01
-
동양평화론의 논의 기저와 역사상
역사와현실
2014 .12
-
‘전쟁의 기억’과 ‘기억의 전쟁’ : 특별한 피난체험을 중심으로
통일인문학
2014 .03
-
전쟁과 평화 그리고 정의
철학연구
2005 .03
-
패전 직후 일본의 ‘평화교육’ 재음미
역사와 담론
2012 .10
-
냉전 초기 사회주의진영 내부의 전쟁·평화 담론의 충돌과 북한의 한국전쟁 인식 변화
역사와현실
2012 .03
-
동아시아 근현대사에서 戰爭과 平和에 對한 記憶의 差異, 그리고 歷史敎育 : 동아시아 5개국의 中高校用 自國史 및 世界史 敎科書를 中心으로
역사교육
2002 .06
-
청일전쟁에 대한 한·일의 기억과 전승 : 증폭과 망각의 양극
역사와 세계
2014 .12
-
아시아-태평양전쟁과 한국의 주권회복
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2005 .12
-
냉전 후 한일관계의 특징과 과제 : 구조적 요인의 변화를 중심으로
한국민족문화
2001 .09
-
韓日兩國의 歷史認識問題
사학연구
2003 .12
-
国際情勢と日本ㆍ北朝鮮の動向から東アジアの平和構築を考える
아시아문화연구
2006 .12
-
한국전쟁기 전쟁시의 국가주의의 시선
한국시학연구
2008 .04
-
동학농민전쟁과 일본군
역사연구
2014 .12
-
日清、日露戦争期における日本キリスト教とその朝鮮認識に関する研究
일본문화연구
2014 .10
-
한국의 평화선과 일본의 대응한계 : 일본의회 독도관련 속기록을 중심으로(1952~1953)
일본문화학보
2010 .11
-
근대 일본의 전사자 위령에 대한 연구사적 접근 : 전후 일본학계의 연구를 중심으로
비교문화연구
2011 .07
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-905-018273737