지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Most of east asians don't yet have forgotten the invasion by Japan in the first half of 20th century. Meanwhile Japan government strained over again the truth in a history text for junior high school. This fact resulted in racial resistance of the neighboring countries against Japan. That is the motive to write this paper.
The object of this paper is to arrange how to describe neighboring peoples' memorial difference on japanese invasion in a history text of 5 countries and how they have been trying to overcome the scars of war and the discord of memory.
Japanese history texts have an attempt to describe the Sino-Japanese War(1894~1895), the Russo-Japanese War(1904~1905), the Pacific Asian War(1931~1945) and the expansion of the war as japan's correspondence according to changing the international situation. In an extension of this idea, it seems so clear for the intention to cover up the war of aggression through the content of structure and the style of description.
The texts of south Korea, north Korea, China, Taiwan don't concretely emphasize the act of japanese aggression but describe japanese invasion as a background of resistance history. On the contrary, the history text of 4 countries put an emphasis on describing independent action of its own, as it were, the resistance movement. So the image to the political history of modern east asia is different among history texts of 5 countries. This will be a obstacle in forming east asian network.
Reflection and criticism on the act of aggression of Japan started from two movements domestically. One is the peace movement, the other is the compensation for victims of atomic bomb used in the Pacific War. However each countries' education of peace and human rights are done not at the side of the universal value of human beings but limited to national interests. Above all, the history texts of 4 countries except Japan's never pay attention to the compensation and the present state for aggressive war of Japan. The history education toward pointing at the future for postwar coexistence of peace is lack of concreteness.
The political solution to dispel discord and difference from the memory among the 5 east asian nations around the aggressive war will have to start from the apology of the japanese king(昭和天皇) to admit the responsibility of the invasion. At the same time, it will have together to make scientific and history-educational attempt to be able to make narrow the difference of memory by publishing alternative texts or auxiliary textbooks commonly used in east asia.
The object of this paper is to arrange how to describe neighboring peoples' memorial difference on japanese invasion in a history text of 5 countries and how they have been trying to overcome the scars of war and the discord of memory.
Japanese history texts have an attempt to describe the Sino-Japanese War(1894~1895), the Russo-Japanese War(1904~1905), the Pacific Asian War(1931~1945) and the expansion of the war as japan's correspondence according to changing the international situation. In an extension of this idea, it seems so clear for the intention to cover up the war of aggression through the content of structure and the style of description.
The texts of south Korea, north Korea, China, Taiwan don't concretely emphasize the act of japanese aggression but describe japanese invasion as a background of resistance history. On the contrary, the history text of 4 countries put an emphasis on describing independent action of its own, as it were, the resistance movement. So the image to the political history of modern east asia is different among history texts of 5 countries. This will be a obstacle in forming east asian network.
Reflection and criticism on the act of aggression of Japan started from two movements domestically. One is the peace movement, the other is the compensation for victims of atomic bomb used in the Pacific War. However each countries' education of peace and human rights are done not at the side of the universal value of human beings but limited to national interests. Above all, the history texts of 4 countries except Japan's never pay attention to the compensation and the present state for aggressive war of Japan. The history education toward pointing at the future for postwar coexistence of peace is lack of concreteness.
The political solution to dispel discord and difference from the memory among the 5 east asian nations around the aggressive war will have to start from the apology of the japanese king(昭和天皇) to admit the responsibility of the invasion. At the same time, it will have together to make scientific and history-educational attempt to be able to make narrow the difference of memory by publishing alternative texts or auxiliary textbooks commonly used in east asia.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 청ㆍ일, 러ㆍ일전쟁과 동아시아 질서의 재편
3. 아시아태평양전쟁과 세계 질서의 재편
4. 原爆ㆍ戰後補償과 평화
5. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
민족ㆍ국민사와 동아시아사의 접맥 : 동아시아의 역사인식 공유를 위한 모색
역사와실학
2007 .06
-
War and Memory in Korean History
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2004 .09
-
패전 직후 일본의 ‘평화교육’ 재음미
역사와 담론
2012 .10
-
패전 직후 일본의 역사교육 쟁점과 대안 모색
역사와 담론
2010 .08
-
동북아 시대에서 한국사 서술과 역사교육 : ‘국사’를 넘어서
역사교육
2005 .09
-
한ㆍ일 중학교 역사교과서의 근대사 서술 분석 : 한ㆍ일 관계를 중심으로
계명사학
2008 .11
-
동아시아 역사상, 그 구축의 방식과 윤곽
역사학보
2008 .12
-
[총설] 최근의 한중관계사·한일관계사 연구의 쇄도와 새로운 동양사 연구 방향의 탐색
역사학보
2014 .09
-
한국 역사학의 재구성을 위한 방법으로서 동아시아사
동북아역사논총
2013 .06
-
동아시아사 교과서에서 동아시아사와 세계사 연계 방안
동북아역사논총
2013 .06
-
1950년대 일본 역사교육의 국가 통제와 교과서 서술 분석
史叢(사총)
2013 .01
-
「동아시아사로서의 한국사」구성을 위한 再論
한국사학보
2009 .02
-
일본 세계사 교육의 동아시아사
동북아역사논총
2008 .03
-
한·일 역사교과서 협의 사례 연구
일어일문학
2013 .11
-
중국근현대사 연구 50년의 성과와 과제
동양사학연구
2015 .12
-
동아시아사 교육의 연구동향 분석 : 근현대사를 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2016 .09
-
고등학교 『세계사』 ·『동아시아사』 교과서의 일본 근현대사 서술
역사교육
2017 .09
-
최근 중등학교 역사 교육과정 개정에 따른 세계사 과목의 편제와 내용 구성의 변화
역사교육
2011 .12
-
‘학습부담 경감’으로 포장된 역사교육의 퇴행 : 세계사와 동아시아사 내용 구성의 문제점
역사비평
2015 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015490675