지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper examines the relations among three parties: monopolistic capital, laborers, and the government-general surrounding labor problems through the case study of Kyeongseong Electric Co. (hereafter KEC). The characteristic of labor management of KEC was one of coercive labor management with the base of workers working long hours and receiving low wages and the instability of employment. The most prominent characteristic was the discrimination between the employee levels(for example the staff[職員]-minor employee[雇員] and temporary employee[傭員]). This discrimination between the employee levels was in fact discrimination between nationalities because most of the staff and minor employees were Japanese and most of the temporary employees were Korean.
Discontent of the Korean temporary employees led to the organization of the Labor Union, and the Labor Union raised the demand for improvement of working conditions and higher wages. However, KEC disregarded these demands and finally the conflict between management and laborers brought about strikes by the laborers. The representative example was the strikes of the electric car crew in February and March 1925. As a result of these strikes, the Labor Union of the electric car crew, KyeongJeon Woonsudongwoohoe[京電運輸同友會] was established. KEC, however, continued to oppress the laborers and exterminated the Labor Union with the support of the government-general and the Japanese police.
Strong support of the government-general and the Japanese police made it possible for KEC management to continue its coercive and discriminatory labor management. Because the government-general, at that time, thought that the Japanese capital must be invited for the industrial development of Korea, therefore, the governmentgeneral implemented policies to oppress the laborers.
Discontent of the Korean temporary employees led to the organization of the Labor Union, and the Labor Union raised the demand for improvement of working conditions and higher wages. However, KEC disregarded these demands and finally the conflict between management and laborers brought about strikes by the laborers. The representative example was the strikes of the electric car crew in February and March 1925. As a result of these strikes, the Labor Union of the electric car crew, KyeongJeon Woonsudongwoohoe[京電運輸同友會] was established. KEC, however, continued to oppress the laborers and exterminated the Labor Union with the support of the government-general and the Japanese police.
Strong support of the government-general and the Japanese police made it possible for KEC management to continue its coercive and discriminatory labor management. Because the government-general, at that time, thought that the Japanese capital must be invited for the industrial development of Korea, therefore, the governmentgeneral implemented policies to oppress the laborers.
목차
Ⅰ. 序言
Ⅱ. 京電의 강압적 인사관리
Ⅲ. 쟁의 발생과 京電의 대응
Ⅳ. 결어
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
동일방직 사건과 1970년대 여성노동자, 그리고 지식
역사비평
2015 .08
-
노동문학을 넘어 일상적 노동의 회복으로
한국문학논총
2019 .01
-
20세기 전반 한반도에서 日帝의 渡航 관리정책 : 중국인 노동자를 중심으로
중국근현대사연구
2013 .06
-
[논문] 일제지배 말기의 '노무관리'와 노동통제
역사와현실
2003 .12
-
노동 소설의 새로운 모색
어문연구
2007 .01
-
國民政府의 勞動政策과 上海 勞動界
동양사학연구
2001 .07
-
Recent Korean Labor Novels : "Labor" Literature vs. Labor "Literature"
Korea Journal
1989 .03
-
정부수립 후 노동위원회의 설치와 노동문제
동방학지
2008 .01
-
A Study of a Korean Labor Union
Korea Journal
1983 .04
-
일제지배 말기의 파시즘적 勞動觀과 ‘勞資一體論’
동방학지
2002 .01
-
20세기 전반 韓半島에서 日帝의 勞動市場 관리 -중국인 노동자를 중심으로-
중국사연구
2013 .01
-
산업 공화국의 도래 : 미국 노사관계의 변형과 그 역사적 의미
역사교육
2008 .03
-
Labor Movement in Korea
Korea Journal
1964 .03
-
규율화된 신체, 저항하는 신체 : 여성노동자수기를 중심으로
서강인문논총
2018 .08
-
‘일’과 젠더: 쏘로우의 「월든」과 루이자 메이 올코트의 「일」
근대영미소설
2011 .01
-
노사관계 초우량기업의 경영특성에 관한 연구
성곡논총
2000 .08
-
한국전쟁 이후의 노무동원과 노동자 생활
한국사연구
2009 .06
-
해방이후 북한의 노동조합 성격논쟁과 노동정책 특질
역사와현실
2008 .12
-
1930년대 京城電氣의 사업부문별 경영분석을 통해 본 대중교통기구로서의 위상
대동문화연구
2007 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018333829