지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aims of the project of Dongbuk is to research that the history of Manchuria has not relationship with korean history but has much relationship with chinese history. Therefore the researchers of China proper who have taken pan in the projects of Dongbuk proclaimed that Balhae and Koguryo had much relationship not to Korea but to China. The most important problem on the Balhae history is that it was belong to korean history and succeeded the kingdom of Koguryo has been attacked by them furiously. Looking into their papers on them, I have found that their target is to denied the Yu Duk Gong's theory.
So thus I have studied and arranged all about Nambukguk theory from it's origin to it's conclusion, the Nambukguk times theory. And after this, I arranged the principals and paradigms of the Nambukguk times theory.
Nambukguk theory had been expressed in the preface of the Balhaego written by Yu Duk Gong(l748-1807). In this, he had asserted that 3 kingdoms age succeeded by Nambukguk which was consisted by the enlarged Silla in the southern part and the kingdom of Balhae which succeded the kingdom of Koguryo in the northern part. Of course, I think that Yu had no notion of the historical word, times. But his notion of Nambukguk had given strong impact to Han Chi Yun, Chung Yak Yong, Hong Suk Joo, Kim Jung Ho and Sin chae Ho. So they had adopted Yu's idea and had studied the history of Balhae kingdom.
In the imperial Japan colonial times, the korean people encountered the crisis to be perished away. So they studied their ancient history focusing at the spirit of nation and reached to the Nambukguk times theory. I can introduce the scholars. They are Jang Do Bin, Son Jin Tae, and so on. After liberating from imperial Japan, Pak Si Hyung and Yi Woo Sung presented the very same idea of Yu Duk Gong.
Otherwise, in the past the respecters of China proper studied the history of Manchuria what they occupied in order to obtain historical evidences about it. in the first step they encountered one of the most important thing that where Balhae history belongs to. But at last they founded that there is no clue that Balhae history belonged to chinese history, and became to know the existence of Nambukguk theory in Korea. So they showed their nervous attitude and attacked Yu and Yu's work, Balhaego They are Sun Wei Ryang, WangJin Kun and Sun Jin Ji.
In these years, Quo S00 Mei, Woo Wei Hwan, Wang Cung Quo, Chang Bee Puo and Chao Hong who took part in the project of Dongbuk argued that the history of Balhae belongs to chinese history without reason. Reading their papers on this carefully, I find out that they perhaps wrote the papers following some directions which ordered by someone. So the papers of their look like same one written by one people.
Conclusionally speaking, I can declare that they commit following 3 points that were very important and became the basic conditions to study ancient history.
1. They selected and analyzed historical matters in such a very simple way.
2. They misunderstand the ancient history by their wrong view of the world, so called Cheonhagwan.
3. They have no notion of the change in community in ancient society.
In these 3 facts, I determined that they who took part in the project of Dongbuk had made no development in studying Balhae history. They only followed the bad points of the principals of the historical view, Manseon historical view in imperial Japan times.
So thus I have studied and arranged all about Nambukguk theory from it's origin to it's conclusion, the Nambukguk times theory. And after this, I arranged the principals and paradigms of the Nambukguk times theory.
Nambukguk theory had been expressed in the preface of the Balhaego written by Yu Duk Gong(l748-1807). In this, he had asserted that 3 kingdoms age succeeded by Nambukguk which was consisted by the enlarged Silla in the southern part and the kingdom of Balhae which succeded the kingdom of Koguryo in the northern part. Of course, I think that Yu had no notion of the historical word, times. But his notion of Nambukguk had given strong impact to Han Chi Yun, Chung Yak Yong, Hong Suk Joo, Kim Jung Ho and Sin chae Ho. So they had adopted Yu's idea and had studied the history of Balhae kingdom.
In the imperial Japan colonial times, the korean people encountered the crisis to be perished away. So they studied their ancient history focusing at the spirit of nation and reached to the Nambukguk times theory. I can introduce the scholars. They are Jang Do Bin, Son Jin Tae, and so on. After liberating from imperial Japan, Pak Si Hyung and Yi Woo Sung presented the very same idea of Yu Duk Gong.
Otherwise, in the past the respecters of China proper studied the history of Manchuria what they occupied in order to obtain historical evidences about it. in the first step they encountered one of the most important thing that where Balhae history belongs to. But at last they founded that there is no clue that Balhae history belonged to chinese history, and became to know the existence of Nambukguk theory in Korea. So they showed their nervous attitude and attacked Yu and Yu's work, Balhaego They are Sun Wei Ryang, WangJin Kun and Sun Jin Ji.
In these years, Quo S00 Mei, Woo Wei Hwan, Wang Cung Quo, Chang Bee Puo and Chao Hong who took part in the project of Dongbuk argued that the history of Balhae belongs to chinese history without reason. Reading their papers on this carefully, I find out that they perhaps wrote the papers following some directions which ordered by someone. So the papers of their look like same one written by one people.
Conclusionally speaking, I can declare that they commit following 3 points that were very important and became the basic conditions to study ancient history.
1. They selected and analyzed historical matters in such a very simple way.
2. They misunderstand the ancient history by their wrong view of the world, so called Cheonhagwan.
3. They have no notion of the change in community in ancient society.
In these 3 facts, I determined that they who took part in the project of Dongbuk had made no development in studying Balhae history. They only followed the bad points of the principals of the historical view, Manseon historical view in imperial Japan times.
#渤海考
#南北國論
#南北國時代論
#渤海國
#高句麗
#韓致奫
#丁若鏞
#洪奭周
#金正浩
#申采浩
#張道斌
#孫晉泰
#朴時亨
#李佑成
#東北工程
#孫玉良
#王健群
#孫進己
#郭素美
#武玉環
#王成國
#張璧波
#肖紅
#天下觀
#滿鮮史觀
#Yu Ouk Gong
#Balhaego
#Nambukguk theory
#Nambukguk times theory
#kingdom of Balhae
#kingdom of Koguryo
#Silla
#Han Chi Yun
#Chung Yak Yong
#Hong Suk Joo
#Kim Jung Ho
#Sin Chae Ho
#Jang Do Bin
#Son Jin Tae
#Pak Si Hyung
#Yi Woo Sung
#Manchuria
#China proper
#the projects of Dongbuk
#Sun Wei Ryang
#Wang Jin Kun
#Sun Jin Ji
#Quo Soo Mei
#Woo Wei Hwan
#Wang Chung Quo
#Chang Bee Puo
#Chao Hong
#Cheonhagwan
#Manseon historical view
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 남북국시대론의 연혁
Ⅲ. 동북 공정 이전의 견해에 대한 분석
Ⅳ. 동북 공정 이후의 견해에 대한 분석
Ⅴ. 여러 주장에 대한 비판
Ⅵ. 결론
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
발해 정치사의 연구 현황과 과제
한국사연구
2003 .09
-
한국 근대역사학의 발해사 인식 : 南北國論을 중심으로
한국사연구
2017 .12
-
발해의 대외관계사연구의 현황과 과제
한국사연구
2003 .09
-
[기획3 : 한ㆍ중 역사인식의 접점] 한국근현대사에서 고구려와 발해에 관한 인식 - 역사교과서를 중심으로 -
역사와현실
2005 .03
-
歷史理論
역사학보
1989 .12
-
8세기 중엽 渤海와 日本의 關係
한국고대사연구
2002 .03
-
고고학을 통해서 본 발해 건축문화의 정체성
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
나의 발해사 연구
한국고대사연구
2015 .12
-
전근대 국사의 형성과 그 발전
韓國史學史學報
2008 .01
-
고등학교 《한국사》 교과서의 삼국통일 관련 서술에 대한 비교 · 검토
신라사학보
2014 .12
-
발해 문화사의 연구 현황과 과제
한국사연구
2003 .09
-
조선 후기 실학자들의 발해사 연구 성과
한국고대사연구
2011 .06
-
渤海의 天下觀연구 : 高句麗와의 連繫性을 중심으로
고구려발해연구
2008 .11
-
The Case of Korean History
Korea Journal
1970 .11
-
China’s Attempt at “Stealing” Parts of Ancient Korean History
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2004 .12
-
[총설] 최근의 한중관계사·한일관계사 연구의 쇄도와 새로운 동양사 연구 방향의 탐색
역사학보
2014 .09
-
南雲 李弘稙의 韓國古代史 認識 : 《韓國古代史의 硏究》를 중심으로
한국사연구
2009 .03
-
중국의 발해사왜곡논리와 대응방안
한국사학보
2013 .05
-
한국 고대사의 계보학
한국고대사연구
2008 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
柳得恭의 《渤海考》 異本, 유득공 著, 송기호 譯, 2000, 《발해고》, 홍익출판사
林相先
역사학보
2000
.06
[명문으로 보는 우리 역사] 18세기에 쓴 20세기의 글 - 유득공의『발해고』서
박한용
내일을 여는 역사
2000
.07
조선 후기 실학자들의 발해사 연구 성과
김종복
한국고대사연구
2011
.06
북방지역 種族의 繼承關係 검토 : 靺鞨 · 女眞 · 滿洲族을 중심으로
林相先
고구려발해연구
2014
.11
연해주지역 발해 평기와 일고찰 : 꼬쁘이또와 아브리꼬스 절터 출토 평기와를 중심으로
정석배
,
정동귀
고구려발해연구
2014
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-019496698