지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2007.6
- 수록면
- 311 - 328 (18page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The U.S. foreign policy toward North Korea has had profound impacts on the issue of North Korean nuclear weapon development as well as security of Korean Peninsular. Given the importance of U.S. foreign policy toward North Korea, this study attempts to compare and contrast the foreign policy toward North Korea of the Clinton administration and Bush administration to identify changing aspects of the policies and the factors that determined changes of the policies.
As a result of the comparative analysis of the both administrations' foreign policies toward North Korea, it identified some differences and similarities between the two administrations' policies. It found major differences between the two governments in perception of North Korean regime, specific approaches in dealing with North Korea, and negotiation framework. However, the outcomes of analysis show that there have not been significant differences between Clinton and Bush governments in pursuing a grand strategy to maintain the U.S. hegemony and nonproliferation treaty in the post-cold war era. Thus, this study may imply that there will be less possibilities to change the fundamental aspects of U.S. foreign policy toward North Korea even in the future.
As a result of the comparative analysis of the both administrations' foreign policies toward North Korea, it identified some differences and similarities between the two administrations' policies. It found major differences between the two governments in perception of North Korean regime, specific approaches in dealing with North Korea, and negotiation framework. However, the outcomes of analysis show that there have not been significant differences between Clinton and Bush governments in pursuing a grand strategy to maintain the U.S. hegemony and nonproliferation treaty in the post-cold war era. Thus, this study may imply that there will be less possibilities to change the fundamental aspects of U.S. foreign policy toward North Korea even in the future.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 클린턴 행정부의 대북한 정책
Ⅲ. 부시행정부의 대북한 정책
Ⅳ. 결어
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
북한의 외교와 대남정책에 관한 연구 : 성과와 과제
현대북한연구
2010 .04
-
북한 외교정책의 변화 추이 : 국제정세의 변화를 중심으로
국제정치연구
2009 .06
-
부시행정부의 대북정책에 관한 소고
군사학연구
2005 .01
-
Changes in North Korea and Policy Responses of the International Community toward North Korea
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2009 .09
-
북한사회의 변화 전망과 대북 정책의 방향
경기연구원 기본연구
2009 .11
-
Moving from a North Korean Nuclear Problem to the Problem of North Korea
EAI 이슈브리핑
2009 .06
-
The Obama Administration and Preparations for North Korean Instability
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2009 .01
-
Foreign Trade of North Korea, 1955~68
아세아연구
1970 .12
-
North Korea’s South Korea Policy: An Evaluation of Determining Variables and Prospects for 2012
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2011 .01
-
Comparative Study on the Korean University Students’ North Korean Policy and Perception: With Primary Focus on the Periods of Lee Myung Bak and Roh Moo Hyun Regimes
세계지역연구논총
2009 .01
-
Shattering Myths and Assumptions: The Implications of North Korea’s Strategic Culture for U.S. Policy
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2009 .01
-
The North Korean Economy: Current Situation, Crisis, and Possible Scenarios
Asian International Studies Review
2006 .01
-
노무현 정부 대북정책의 성과와 평가
정치정보연구
2008 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-305-019541307