지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this thesis, I reviewed the document called 'Su-bon(手本)' which has never been introduced. There are many kinds of Su-bon, meanwhile we have known them as official document.
But I would try to give another type of Su-bon a term of 'Sojihyung Su-bon (所志型 手本)' that have similar shapes of 'Soji(所志)' which had been submitted a petition to a local government. And looking into Su-bon, I studied what it had forms, contents, writings, processes of disposition.
After through out all these analysis, I could reach the several conclusions below.
First. Writers of Su-bon were peoples, servants, officials of the smallest unit of the administrative organization(ex. 風?, 上任, 洞任 etc.) When they submitted Su-bon, there were not in the name of an individual but a joint signature at least four persons.
Second. Forms of Su-bon were similar to a kinds of 'So-ji' which had been submitted a petition to a local government. Besides a 'So-ji' of the most similar to 'Deong-jang(等狀, a petition which had been submitted to official government in many people's signatures), nothing but just replace Su-bon with So-ji.
Third. The measuring organization of Su-bon were the competent authorities (本官) and Royal secret inspector(暗行御史). In spite of a same content of petition, submitted to the provincial authorities(監司), not written as Su-bon but Ui-song(議送, a petition which had been submitted to the provincial authorities)
Forth. The contents of Su-bon were not concerned with personal dispute but a tax . Especially that was something to do with the tax which have relation to a local society's interests.
Fifth. Based on forth, the matter was concerned with official affairs. So in the process of handling the matter, the government office should have intervened in it eagerly.
According to the conclusion above, we can know another side of Su-bon which have a different style except for the side of Su-bon as 'a public report'. Generally there were many kinds of written petition, just like a group of So-ji (所志類), for instance So-ji(所志), Bal-gwal(白活, this is pronounced natively in Korea), Dan-ja(單子), Sang-seo(上書) and exceptionally in addition to another document, called 'Su-bon' that have never ever been known to.
But I would try to give another type of Su-bon a term of 'Sojihyung Su-bon (所志型 手本)' that have similar shapes of 'Soji(所志)' which had been submitted a petition to a local government. And looking into Su-bon, I studied what it had forms, contents, writings, processes of disposition.
After through out all these analysis, I could reach the several conclusions below.
First. Writers of Su-bon were peoples, servants, officials of the smallest unit of the administrative organization(ex. 風?, 上任, 洞任 etc.) When they submitted Su-bon, there were not in the name of an individual but a joint signature at least four persons.
Second. Forms of Su-bon were similar to a kinds of 'So-ji' which had been submitted a petition to a local government. Besides a 'So-ji' of the most similar to 'Deong-jang(等狀, a petition which had been submitted to official government in many people's signatures), nothing but just replace Su-bon with So-ji.
Third. The measuring organization of Su-bon were the competent authorities (本官) and Royal secret inspector(暗行御史). In spite of a same content of petition, submitted to the provincial authorities(監司), not written as Su-bon but Ui-song(議送, a petition which had been submitted to the provincial authorities)
Forth. The contents of Su-bon were not concerned with personal dispute but a tax . Especially that was something to do with the tax which have relation to a local society's interests.
Fifth. Based on forth, the matter was concerned with official affairs. So in the process of handling the matter, the government office should have intervened in it eagerly.
According to the conclusion above, we can know another side of Su-bon which have a different style except for the side of Su-bon as 'a public report'. Generally there were many kinds of written petition, just like a group of So-ji (所志類), for instance So-ji(所志), Bal-gwal(白活, this is pronounced natively in Korea), Dan-ja(單子), Sang-seo(上書) and exceptionally in addition to another document, called 'Su-bon' that have never ever been known to.
목차
1. 서론
2. 자료소개
3. 수본의 형식과 내용
4. 수본의 처리과정
5. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선시대 한성부 所志 題辭에 기재된 千字文 字號와 六房의 업무 분담
장서각
2020 .04
-
朝鮮時代 所志類의 着官 硏究 : 慶州 驪州李氏 獨樂堂 所志類를 中心으로
장서각
2005 .12
-
『현종실록』의 편찬과 개수(改修)- 시정기찬수범례(時政記纂修凡例)를 통한 비교 -
韓國史學史學報
2014 .01
-
숙대본 A를 활용한 <김희경전>의 정본 구축 방안
어문학
2016 .06
-
최명익 『서산대사』의 『평양지』 수용과 평양 공간의 재구성
우리말글
2020 .03
-
『첩해신어』의 수여동사에 대한 고찰-「원간본」「개수본」「중간본」의 비교를 중심으로-
일어일문학
2001 .05
-
종결어미 {-지}의 의미 분석
한국어학
2017 .05
-
『이자수어(李子粹語)』 편찬에 나타난 성호의 퇴계학 계승의식
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2020 .03
-
조선시대 濟州牧使의 문서 행정 연구
장서각
2015 .10
-
조선후기 籍沒 ‘位土’ 회복과정 연구 - 居昌 草溪鄭氏 고문서를 중심으로 -
古文書硏究
2006 .01
-
全琫準의 革命思想考察 : 洪招錄을 中心으로
동학연구
2001 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-151-001733516