지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aim of this article is to survey the structure of chakgwan(着官, a signature of a official title) on soji(所志, a petition). And the subject of this study are historical old documents that were kept by Yeoju-Lee family in Kyeongju Doknakdang.
The terms for various types sojis were not confirmed, so I have divided them as two types. The one is for bringing forward seongju(城主), the other is for bringing forward gwanchalsa(觀察使).
According to Yuseopilji(儒胥必知) chakgwan must be written larger than others. In other words, chakgwan must be written larger than jesa(題辭), jesa larger than the body(本文).
The first case we can see a form, "an official title + a signature(官職名+押)". It means that people brought soji forward their governor(屬官). But if someone brought it forward another province's governor, a form got different like this, "a name of province + an official title + a signature(地域名+官職名+押)".
Generally the second case is called eusong(議送). It is different from the first case. On 15th century's Jang an-yang(張安良) eu-song we can see a dosa(都事, a vice-gwanchalsa)'s signature, "a official title+signature", below gwanchalsa's signature. But on 16th century's Kyeongju Seobaekdang eusong we can see a changing of dosa's signature form. There was no form like "a official title + signature" any more. Just we can see a mark standing for dosa. It is supposed that the changing of signature form was caused by a weakening of dosa's official role.
In addition there are bongin(封印), migyoin(未交印), toijang(退狀) which are written between chakgwan and seoab(署押). Originally Bongin meant closing a stamp case because the official was absent. So Bongin was written below chakgwan without a official stamp on jesa. Migyoin was used when the latter official did not arrived after the former's leaving. Toijang was used when a soji was returned to the petitioner because of judgment's difficulties.
The terms for various types sojis were not confirmed, so I have divided them as two types. The one is for bringing forward seongju(城主), the other is for bringing forward gwanchalsa(觀察使).
According to Yuseopilji(儒胥必知) chakgwan must be written larger than others. In other words, chakgwan must be written larger than jesa(題辭), jesa larger than the body(本文).
The first case we can see a form, "an official title + a signature(官職名+押)". It means that people brought soji forward their governor(屬官). But if someone brought it forward another province's governor, a form got different like this, "a name of province + an official title + a signature(地域名+官職名+押)".
Generally the second case is called eusong(議送). It is different from the first case. On 15th century's Jang an-yang(張安良) eu-song we can see a dosa(都事, a vice-gwanchalsa)'s signature, "a official title+signature", below gwanchalsa's signature. But on 16th century's Kyeongju Seobaekdang eusong we can see a changing of dosa's signature form. There was no form like "a official title + signature" any more. Just we can see a mark standing for dosa. It is supposed that the changing of signature form was caused by a weakening of dosa's official role.
In addition there are bongin(封印), migyoin(未交印), toijang(退狀) which are written between chakgwan and seoab(署押). Originally Bongin meant closing a stamp case because the official was absent. So Bongin was written below chakgwan without a official stamp on jesa. Migyoin was used when the latter official did not arrived after the former's leaving. Toijang was used when a soji was returned to the petitioner because of judgment's difficulties.
목차
Ⅰ. 緖言
Ⅱ. 所志類의 構成과 着官
Ⅲ. 城主의 着官 形態
Ⅳ. 觀察使의 着官 形態
Ⅴ. 其他 所志 着官의 形態
Ⅵ. 結言
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선시대 한성부 所志 題辭에 기재된 千字文 字號와 六房의 업무 분담
장서각
2020 .04
-
조선후기 手本의 한 연구 : 慶州 驪州李氏 癡菴宗宅 소장 고문서를 중심으로
장서각
2005 .12
-
조선후기 평민 여성의 한글 소지所志 글쓰기
국학연구
2018 .07
-
고려후기 所志의 처리절차와 立案 발급
古文書硏究
2006 .01
-
[논문] 고려 현종대 정치와 이계(吏系) 관료
역사와현실
2005 .03
-
朝鮮初期 官署ㆍ官職體系의 정비
호서문화논총
1996 .02
-
全琫準의 革命思想考察 : 洪招錄을 中心으로
동학연구
2001 .09
-
秦代 ‘新地’ 吏員의 구성과 그 한계
중국고중세사연구
2018 .08
-
광해군과 奉印寺
역사와실학
2009 .04
-
巫覡의 役割과 統制 : 麗末鮮初를 중심으로
원불교사상과종교문화
2019 .03
-
조선전기 의료기구 개편의 성격과 그 의의
의사학
2020 .04
-
조선시대 濟州牧使의 문서 행정 연구
장서각
2015 .10
-
新羅 “官等” 用語의 檢討
경주사학
1996 .12
-
手決(花押)의 개념에 대한 연구- 禮式으로서의 署名과 着押 -
古文書硏究
2002 .01
-
魏晋南北朝時代 公文書의 署名 방식 연구- 紙木倂用 時期의 署·姓名·押을 중심으로 -
古文書硏究
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-151-001733490