지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The most important matter of the civil relief means related to computer-related inventions is the suit instituted against infringement on patent. The lawsuit raised against patent infringement is a legal proceedings where the victim, who had his/her rights infringed upon by yd parties, seeks judgment regarding the suspension or prohibition of the act of infringing, destruction of articles produced due to the act of infringement, and compensation for damage. The lawsuit instituted against patent infringement basically handles intangible property rights called patent inventions, and such fact creates some special problems not existing in ordinary civil proceedings.
Of such special problems, this paper attempts to comment on those related to the object of judgment (object of lawsuit), specific problems regarding the type of infringement and the overview and the effects of the provisional disposition procedures occupying in actuality the most important status in the lawsuit raised against patent infringement. At the same time, the paper attempts to examine special problems ensuing in case the object of lawsuit is the invention of the computer programs, in relation to the lawsuit instituted against patent infringement.
First of all, the range of the object of lawsuit will be checked in a lawsuit filed against patent infringement. This paper in this connection examines whether the objects of a lawsuit should be treated as separate items in case the act of the defendant is changed and whether each item of claims should be treated as the object of a lawsuit in relation to the objects of lawsuits or should be handled as one comprehensive item, in case one patent rights carries multiple number of claims.
In relation to the specific problems relating to the infringement pattern, the paper attempts to comment on the necessity for the clarification of the infringement pattern, the specific methods used in general during the practical work and related problems, defendant's obligation to specify detailed pattern, and examples in foreign countries regarding the orders issued to submit documents for clarification and whether such examples can be applied to the Korean laws.
As for the provisional disposition procedures, the paper examines whether preservation necessary in a provisional disposition case ordering suspension of the act of patent infringement, whether the provisional disposition procedure can handle the newness and the progressiveness of the patent inventions, examines the burdens and usefulness of the creditor with respect to the provisional disposition procedure, and finally briefly comments on the issue of compensation for damage in relation to the execution of the said provisional disposition.
Of such special problems, this paper attempts to comment on those related to the object of judgment (object of lawsuit), specific problems regarding the type of infringement and the overview and the effects of the provisional disposition procedures occupying in actuality the most important status in the lawsuit raised against patent infringement. At the same time, the paper attempts to examine special problems ensuing in case the object of lawsuit is the invention of the computer programs, in relation to the lawsuit instituted against patent infringement.
First of all, the range of the object of lawsuit will be checked in a lawsuit filed against patent infringement. This paper in this connection examines whether the objects of a lawsuit should be treated as separate items in case the act of the defendant is changed and whether each item of claims should be treated as the object of a lawsuit in relation to the objects of lawsuits or should be handled as one comprehensive item, in case one patent rights carries multiple number of claims.
In relation to the specific problems relating to the infringement pattern, the paper attempts to comment on the necessity for the clarification of the infringement pattern, the specific methods used in general during the practical work and related problems, defendant's obligation to specify detailed pattern, and examples in foreign countries regarding the orders issued to submit documents for clarification and whether such examples can be applied to the Korean laws.
As for the provisional disposition procedures, the paper examines whether preservation necessary in a provisional disposition case ordering suspension of the act of patent infringement, whether the provisional disposition procedure can handle the newness and the progressiveness of the patent inventions, examines the burdens and usefulness of the creditor with respect to the provisional disposition procedure, and finally briefly comments on the issue of compensation for damage in relation to the execution of the said provisional disposition.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 컴퓨터 프로그램 발명의 보호
Ⅲ. 특허침해금지청구소송의 심판의 대상
Ⅳ. 피고 침해태양의 특정(가호의 특정)
Ⅴ. 맺으며
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
특허권 공동침해에 관한 소고
강원법학
2012 .02
-
Impact of Intellectual Property Infringement Lawsuits in the U.S. on Firm Value
Asian International Studies Review
2007 .01
-
특허권침해에 대한 손해배상액의 산정
경영법률
2008 .01
-
특허발명에 있어서의 이용발명과 균등론
기업법연구
2009 .03
-
국제지적재산소송에서 정보제공의무의 확대에 따른 절차법상 연구
원광법학
2012 .01
-
복수주체에 의한 실시와 특허권 침해
법학평론
2016 .04
-
특허권의 실효성 확보를 위한 가중적 손해배상제도의 도입에 대한 연구
강원법학
2011 .06
-
스마트기기에 탑재 가능한 애플리케이션 관련 발명의 특허권법상 보호 방안에 관한 연구
민사법의 이론과 실무
2012 .01
-
컴퓨터프로그램의 침해에 대한 구제소송체계의 개선방향 : 지적재산권의 참해에 대한 구제소송의 집중관할제도 도입과 관련하여
행정법연구
2002 .08
-
형사소송법상 소송의 개념과 이에 따른 체계의 한 이해
서강법률논총
2013 .02
-
특허법상 간접침해에 대한 연구
법과정책
2011 .01
-
일본에서 특허의 유효성에 대한 중재가능성-킬비 판결(일본 특허법 제104조의3)을 중심으로-
중재연구
2011 .01
-
특허소송제도와 활성화에 관한 검토
법과정책
2018 .01
-
특허괴물(Patent Troll)의 고액실시행위에 대한 독점규제법상의 규제
경영법률
2012 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0