개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this article is to study how to establish a better refined IP Law System an The Code of Civil Procedured . We have concentrated in connection with jurisdiction and venue patent disputes in a few courts.
Moreover We have allowed the attorney to advocate patent case, of course only with ordinary lawyer. In Korea, something good happens almost every day in IP Law System. However, it's contributions to industry are not sufficient. The author suggests a strategy against the patent litigation in an international infringement of the patent The Code of Civil Procedure need to prepare the validity law for the effectuation of a treaty but also the infringement proceedings. And the validity trial should be handled by the current Patent Court . The prepartion is aimed at the patent judge. We put an emphasis on the cooperation between law judges and technical judges in the matter of IP related disputed nation. this article proposes that at the Patent Court related with the international agreement-South Korea – United States Free Trade Agreement (KORUS) or Free Trade Agreement Republic Koreaanad the European Union.
under current law system. As the question of whether the Proof's Law against Intellectual Property Right is indeed infringed or not is seldom under control of the ordinary The Code of Civil Procedure, it would be very resonable, if not the problem happen to the parties concerned or an interested party.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0