지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study is to examine when and how modem historiography was created and changed in Korea, focusing on the dynamics of nation-building. From 1894 reform, Korean government separated history from Confucianism and emphasized National history instead of China history. Reflecting its status as a sovereign state, Korean Education Ministry changed its name of country as well as the name of China and Japan in its history textbooks. At the same time, it thought meanly of China while manifesting friendly relations with Japan. Before and after the establishment of Great Han Empire in 1897, a linear history based on modem version of orthodoxy theories was formed, when old orthodoxy theories emphasizing Mahan(馬韓) were applied to the enactment of the name of country, i.e, the Great Han.
After 1905 Protectorate Treaty, new style of historiography(新史體) was prevalent as a basic histriography style and two kinds of system of linear history. New style of historiography, or Westem style of historiography were pervaded by Hyon Chae(玄采) who adapted Chosonsa(朝鮮史) written by Japanese Hayashi Taisuke(林泰輔) from Korean point of view. From that time, most history textbooks were modeled on Tong'guksaryak(東國史略), which has exerted much influence over the Korean historiography up to now as well as in the period of Japanese rule. In this sense, we can figure Tong'guksaryak the first linear history written by a Korean, while its system of linear history was formed as following sequence and still prevalent nowadays: Tangun(檀君)→Kiija(箕子)→Samhan(三韓)→Three Kingdom→Shilla Unified(統一新羅)→Taebong(泰封)ㆍPost-Paekje(後百濟)→Parhae(渤海)→Koryeo(高麗)→Choson(朝鮮)
At the same period, Sin Chaeho(申采浩) criticized the existing history textbooks fiercely, claiming that Puyeo(夫餘) had been the host ethnic throught Korean history. In order to write Korean history independent of China and Japan, He denied the old orthodoxy theories(정통론) and created a system of linear history based on new orthodoxy theory focusing on nation, maintaining that the subject of orthodoxy must be attributed to a nation instead of a dynasty, His system of linear history was fanned only as Tangun→Puyeo→Koguryeo(高句麗)→Parhae, not referring to Koryeo and Choson. It helped the Koreans aspire to advance into and rule Manchuria before and after 1905, while it functioned as an important text that mobilized the Koreans in Manchuria nationalistically during Japanese occupation.
After 1905 Protectorate Treaty, new style of historiography(新史體) was prevalent as a basic histriography style and two kinds of system of linear history. New style of historiography, or Westem style of historiography were pervaded by Hyon Chae(玄采) who adapted Chosonsa(朝鮮史) written by Japanese Hayashi Taisuke(林泰輔) from Korean point of view. From that time, most history textbooks were modeled on Tong'guksaryak(東國史略), which has exerted much influence over the Korean historiography up to now as well as in the period of Japanese rule. In this sense, we can figure Tong'guksaryak the first linear history written by a Korean, while its system of linear history was formed as following sequence and still prevalent nowadays: Tangun(檀君)→Kiija(箕子)→Samhan(三韓)→Three Kingdom→Shilla Unified(統一新羅)→Taebong(泰封)ㆍPost-Paekje(後百濟)→Parhae(渤海)→Koryeo(高麗)→Choson(朝鮮)
At the same period, Sin Chaeho(申采浩) criticized the existing history textbooks fiercely, claiming that Puyeo(夫餘) had been the host ethnic throught Korean history. In order to write Korean history independent of China and Japan, He denied the old orthodoxy theories(정통론) and created a system of linear history based on new orthodoxy theory focusing on nation, maintaining that the subject of orthodoxy must be attributed to a nation instead of a dynasty, His system of linear history was fanned only as Tangun→Puyeo→Koguryeo(高句麗)→Parhae, not referring to Koryeo and Choson. It helped the Koreans aspire to advance into and rule Manchuria before and after 1905, while it functioned as an important text that mobilized the Koreans in Manchuria nationalistically during Japanese occupation.
목차
머리말
1. 자국사 교육의 도입과 역사교과서 편찬
2. 중화 질서의 탈피와 만국공법 질서의 수용
3. 정통론의 근대적 변용을 통한 통사 체계 구성
4. 신사체의 보편화와 두 가지 통사 체계의 확립
맺음말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (53)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[사상사ㆍ역사이론] 낡은 새로운 역사와 새로운 낡은 역사 : 역사이론ㆍ사학사의 침체와 사상사의 부상
역사학보
2013 .09
-
歷史理論
역사학보
1989 .12
-
전근대 국사의 형성과 그 발전
韓國史學史學報
2008 .01
-
The Case of Korean History
Korea Journal
1970 .11
-
Mapping World History in Korea
The Asian review of world histories
2015 .01
-
서양사학사 최근 경향에 대한 검토와 전망
역사와 담론
2008 .04
-
10학년 〈역사〉 교육과정의 ‘비교’ 내용 구성 방향
역사와 세계
2009 .06
-
동북아 시대에서 한국사 서술과 역사교육 : ‘국사’를 넘어서
역사교육
2005 .09
-
[총설] 최근의 한중관계사·한일관계사 연구의 쇄도와 새로운 동양사 연구 방향의 탐색
역사학보
2014 .09
-
해방 이후 역사 교육과정 개정을 둘러싼 쟁점
역사교육
2006 .03
-
한국 고대사의 계보학
한국고대사연구
2008 .12
-
역사교육 계열화를 위한 고등학교 국사교육 내용구성 방안
역사와 담론
2005 .04
-
근대 민족사학의 전통 역사학 평가 재검토 : 신채호와 백남운을 중심으로
한국학논집
2011 .06
-
우리나라 대학의 세계사 교육의 문제와 개선방향
역사교육
2008 .12
-
한국사 연구와 역사교육에서 정체성과 역동성, 공동체 정신
역사교육
2016 .06
-
한국 역사학의 재구성을 위한 방법으로서 동아시아사
동북아역사논총
2013 .06
-
전후(戰後) 일본에서의 조선사학의 개시와 사학사(史學史)상(像) : 1950~60년대를 중심으로
한국사연구
2011 .06
-
중학교 국사교육의 의미와 내용구성
역사교육
2012 .12
-
[총설] 한국 서양사학 2009~2010 : 고르며 땅 다지기
역사학보
2011 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0