지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.5
- 수록면
- 141 - 152 (12page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
EU established New Regulation Systems (NRF) for electronic communications market in 2002. According to NRF, national regulatory authorities have general competence for resolving conflicts arising between parties on electronics communications market. These authorities are specialized in the treatment of difficulties relating to electronic communications. Pursuant to 2002 Framework Directive, cases brought before national regulatory authorities be resolved with the adoption of a binding decision. But national regulatory authorities may attempt to resolve conflicts through non-conventional mechanisms if Member States allow it.
The NRF further provides that undertakings and individuals may seek redress from national courts. Applicants are not prevented from seeking a remedy in court as a result of request being addressed to an national regulatory authority. In some cases national courts and national regulatory authorities are equally competent to handle cases. Little co-ordinations is provided for in the NRF to resolve concurrent jurisdiction issue between national courts and national regulatory authorities in electronic communications market. It is to be hoped that guidelines will be provided at European level.
Parallel to the rules composing the NRF, undertakings and users alike can act on the basis of the competitions rules where these have been infringed. In pursuance of 1/2003 Regulation, the Member States must designate the authorities which are responsible for the application of European competitions rules on their respective territories. National competition authorities are empowered to adopt decisions requiring that an infringement be brought to an end, ordering interim measures and imposing fines or penalties. Ultimately, the organizational structure established in Regulation 1/2003 ensure that the application of European competitions rules remains the prime responsibility of the European Commission. In that organization, the national authorities act as decentralized organs. The implication is that national competition authorities are indeed subject to the authority of Commission in the fulfillment of tasks.
The NRF further provides that undertakings and individuals may seek redress from national courts. Applicants are not prevented from seeking a remedy in court as a result of request being addressed to an national regulatory authority. In some cases national courts and national regulatory authorities are equally competent to handle cases. Little co-ordinations is provided for in the NRF to resolve concurrent jurisdiction issue between national courts and national regulatory authorities in electronic communications market. It is to be hoped that guidelines will be provided at European level.
Parallel to the rules composing the NRF, undertakings and users alike can act on the basis of the competitions rules where these have been infringed. In pursuance of 1/2003 Regulation, the Member States must designate the authorities which are responsible for the application of European competitions rules on their respective territories. National competition authorities are empowered to adopt decisions requiring that an infringement be brought to an end, ordering interim measures and imposing fines or penalties. Ultimately, the organizational structure established in Regulation 1/2003 ensure that the application of European competitions rules remains the prime responsibility of the European Commission. In that organization, the national authorities act as decentralized organs. The implication is that national competition authorities are indeed subject to the authority of Commission in the fulfillment of tasks.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 전문통신규제(Sector-Specific Regulation)
Ⅲ. 일반 경쟁법의 적용 문제
Ⅳ. 결어
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
전력시장의 경쟁촉진을 위한 효율적인 규제체제
기업법연구
2003 .03
-
競爭狀況評價를 基礎로 한 通信規制모델
행정법연구
2007 .08
-
프랑스 방통융합법제와 그 시사점
경제규제와 법
2008 .05
-
고등학교 「법과 정치」 교과서의 ‘권위의 개념’에 대한 내용 지도
사회과교육
2016 .12
-
Challenges and changes for competition authorities during and post COVID-19
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2020 .06
-
산업안전분야에서의 중복규제 해소방안 : 갈등관리 전략을 중심으로
한국사회와 행정연구
2004 .05
-
EU의 제약산업에 대한 경쟁법 집행 및 경쟁정책과 그 시사점
한국비교정부학보
2019 .01
-
유럽공동체 경쟁법규상의 집행위원회의 역할과 권한
저스티스
2009 .04
-
준정부조직의 생성ㆍ변형ㆍ소멸에 관한 기초 연구 : POSCO의 경제성과 정치성의 변화를 중심으로
한국사회와 행정연구
2005 .08
-
EU法上 유럽司法法院(ECJ)과 會員國國內法院의 協力
비교법학연구
2007 .09
-
Scope and Enforcement of European Competition Law by the Commission, European Courts and the Member States
강원법학
2013 .02
-
아동학대방지와 피해아동보호를 위한 친권법의 개정
중앙법학
2018 .09
-
Establishing Regional Airport Authorities in Korea
한국항공우주정책·법학회지
1995 .01
-
국가충성도와 국가경쟁력 향상을 위한 국가브랜드 아이덴티티수립에 관한 연구
무역연구
2013 .01
-
European Competition Law
강원법학
2013 .02
-
공정거래법상 동의명령제도 도입에 관한 법적 고찰
고려법학
2009 .01
-
Interconnection between authority and human rights
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2013 .10
-
유럽헌법과 국내법간의 효력
공법학연구
2006 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0