지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2003.5
- 수록면
- 197 - 223 (27page)
- DOI
- 10.17068/lhc.2003.10.6.1.197
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Land-Retaking Movement in Gungsam-myun, Naju refers to the continuous struggles to settle the land ownership disputes. It lasted for eithty years, which began with the seizure of private lands by Jeon, Seongchang in 1888 and ended with the completion of land reform in 1970. The movement in Gungsam-myun is regarded as a typical case of land ownership disputes which had gone through a series of different ownership: lands owned privately during the Chosun dynasty lands owned by royal family during the late Chosun dynasty tenant lands owned by Dongyang Colonization Company under the Japanese rule - lands owned by the Shinhan Corporation under the U.S. military administration - private land ownership admitted by the Korean government.
This paper studies the developmental process of land-retaking movement in Gungsam-myun, Naju under the U.S. military administration. The peasants in Gungsam-myun rehabilitated a peasant union and autonomously managed farmlands owned by Dongyang Colonization Company in order to retake the land ownership. In the process, there were some troubles between the peasant union and other organizations like the people’ s committee and the preparatory committee for na tional foundation. However, under the U. S. military administration, farmlands in Gungsam-myun were classified as government-vested property and belonged to the Shinhan Corporation. The Gungsam-myun peasants were not rewarded even though they struggled to retake the land ownership against the U.S. military administration and the Shinhan Corporation. The antagonism against them exploded with the December uprising in 1946 and the Mayday assembly in 1947. The characteristics of the Gungsam-myun movement under the U.S. military administration can be summarized as follows.
First, The Gungsam-myun peasants organized a peasant union and a youth self-defence corps. The youth self-defence corps was an organization similar to the union for land-retaking movement under the Japanese rule.
Second, the Gungsam-myun peasants took the initiative in the movement and exercised autonomous rights.
Third, with the leadership of the peasant union, the Gungsam-myun peasants voluntarily managed the farmlands owned by the Dongyang Colonization Company.
Fourth, the claim of the union was proper. which said that farmlands in Gungsam-myun did not belong to the Dongyang Colonization cCompany and that it was unreasonable to classify them as enemy property.
Fifth, the peasant resistance against the U.S. military administration took shape in the refusal of rent payment and the negotiations with outside organizations. It reached the peak in the December uprising in 1946.
In sum, disputes of the farmland ownership in Gungsam-myun were expressed in various ways under the U.S. military administration. But the U.S. military administration denied and suppressed the proper claim of the Gungsam-myun peasants. Because of the responses of the military administration, the peasants had the impression that the U.S. military administration was the same as the Japanese imperialistic government and the Shinhan Corporation as the Dongyang Colonization Company. As a result, the peasants regarded the administration and the corporation as a subject to be overthrown. The disputes unsloved under the U.S. military administration were flared up again with the establishment of the Korean government.
This paper studies the developmental process of land-retaking movement in Gungsam-myun, Naju under the U.S. military administration. The peasants in Gungsam-myun rehabilitated a peasant union and autonomously managed farmlands owned by Dongyang Colonization Company in order to retake the land ownership. In the process, there were some troubles between the peasant union and other organizations like the people’ s committee and the preparatory committee for na tional foundation. However, under the U. S. military administration, farmlands in Gungsam-myun were classified as government-vested property and belonged to the Shinhan Corporation. The Gungsam-myun peasants were not rewarded even though they struggled to retake the land ownership against the U.S. military administration and the Shinhan Corporation. The antagonism against them exploded with the December uprising in 1946 and the Mayday assembly in 1947. The characteristics of the Gungsam-myun movement under the U.S. military administration can be summarized as follows.
First, The Gungsam-myun peasants organized a peasant union and a youth self-defence corps. The youth self-defence corps was an organization similar to the union for land-retaking movement under the Japanese rule.
Second, the Gungsam-myun peasants took the initiative in the movement and exercised autonomous rights.
Third, with the leadership of the peasant union, the Gungsam-myun peasants voluntarily managed the farmlands owned by the Dongyang Colonization Company.
Fourth, the claim of the union was proper. which said that farmlands in Gungsam-myun did not belong to the Dongyang Colonization cCompany and that it was unreasonable to classify them as enemy property.
Fifth, the peasant resistance against the U.S. military administration took shape in the refusal of rent payment and the negotiations with outside organizations. It reached the peak in the December uprising in 1946.
In sum, disputes of the farmland ownership in Gungsam-myun were expressed in various ways under the U.S. military administration. But the U.S. military administration denied and suppressed the proper claim of the Gungsam-myun peasants. Because of the responses of the military administration, the peasants had the impression that the U.S. military administration was the same as the Japanese imperialistic government and the Shinhan Corporation as the Dongyang Colonization Company. As a result, the peasants regarded the administration and the corporation as a subject to be overthrown. The disputes unsloved under the U.S. military administration were flared up again with the establishment of the Korean government.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 궁삼면 농민회의 재건과 농지탈환운동
3. 미군정과 신한공사의 궁삼면 토지 귀속
4. 신한공사의 귀속농지 분배
5. 결론
(Abstract)
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Peasant
Korea Journal
1988 .09
-
신라하대 농민항쟁의 특징
International Journal of Korean History
2000 .12
-
The Race against Time : Disintegration of the Chang Myun Government and Aborted Democracy
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2004 .09
-
Administration of Land Reform in Korea, 1949-52
Korea Journal
1984 .10
-
20세기 후반 고려 전시과 연구의 定礎 : 《高麗土地制度史硏究》를 통해본 강진철의 연구 성과와 의의
한국사연구
2009 .06
-
Land Reform and Colonial Land Legislation in Korea, 1894–1910
Korea Journal
2014 .09
-
The Problem of Identity among Peasant Women in Korea
Korea Journal
1998 .06
-
프랑스의 農民運動(1789-1793)
역사와 세계
1987 .06
-
Historical Characteristics of the Peasant War of 1894
Korea Journal
1994 .12
-
경남 창원지역 토지조사의 시행과정과 장부체계의 변화
역사와현실
2007 .09
-
新羅의 烟受有田ㆍ畓과 孔烟
한국사연구
2002 .03
-
조선후기 경상도 지역 양반층의 토지소유규모와 지가의 변동
역사와경계
2010 .12
-
대한제국기 광무양안의 토지소유 구조와 농민층의 동향 : 충북 진천군 양안을 중심으로
역사교육
2003 .06
-
Tracing the Course of the Peasant War of 1894
Korea Journal
1994 .12
-
19세기 原州지역의 환곡문제와 농민항쟁
지방사와 지방문화
2010 .11
-
중국의 도시화와 공공토지 사유화
역사비평
2016 .08
-
白南雲의 토지소유론과 그 시대적 의미 : 《朝鮮封建社會經濟史(上)》을 중심으로
한국사연구
2009 .06
-
1930년대 농촌소설의 농민의식 반영 양상 : 김유정론
비평문학
2006 .12
-
일제하 토지회수운동의 전개과정 : 전남 나주군 궁삼면의 사례
한국독립운동사연구
2001 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0