지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 고려대학교 한국사연구소 International Journal of Korean History International Journal of Korean History Vol.1
- 발행연도
- 2000.12
- 수록면
- 113 - 148 (36page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The first record in Korea's history of peasant resistance where the peasants themselves were agents of social change occurred during the later Silla period and has been carefully examined in its links to social change in Tang China, role of powerful local lineages, movements of non-elite classes and the historical position of the peasant.
The first significant large-scale uprising in which the peasants were involved was the Kim H?n-ch'an uprising in 815. Although this commoner uprising, bearing the characteristics of a coup d'etat, had spread to the provinces because of the antagonisms and conflicts amongst the central true bone aristorcracy, it was not a genuine peasant resistance based upon peasant power. Despite the participation of roving 'brigands' (toj?k) and 'grass brigands' (ch'oj?k), they were not centralized forces thus making this resistance nothing more than a peasant power struggle against the central aristocracy using military force.
A significant change occurred in the nature of the peasant armies after the Kim P?m-mun uprising in 825. The leader of the peasant army, Susin, a bandit from Kodarsan, consolidated forces with Kim P?m-mun and attempted to establish a new state capital. This was not simply an attempt by Susin to stop exploitation by regional officials and local landlords but rather an attempt to establish a new state. Thus it displayed characteristics distinct from the small-scale uprisings that occurred in reaction to exploitative taxation. Although the peasant armies had indeed allied themselves with the ruling strata to start the uprising, by the beginning of the 9th century, the uprising had already grown out of incipient forms and possessed the foundations of a statewide peasant resistance movement against the Silla state.
During King Chins?ng's reign (r. 887-896), the erupting peasant revolt swelled to a size that enabled the first step to be taken in the downfall of the Silla kingdom. The direct cause of this revolt was excessive taxation. Growing opposition against the state's taxation changed into a peasant uprising. Peasant uprisings in later Silla generally had occurred in Sangju, Chukchu, and W?nju, central transportation hubs, and erupted in each of these central regions. In addition to these areas, the peasant army appeared frequently in every comer of the country in Kangn?ng, Namhae, Kogs?ng, and Mungy?ng, and were called a variety of names such as Ch'oj?k (grass brigands), Nokrim (green forest), Ch?kio (band of thieves), Sanj?k (mountain brigands). Some peasant armies were even known as the 'Red Trousered Banditti' (ch?kko ch?k). However, they were essentially interested only in pillaging, making it unlikely that any social contradictions could be resolved through their development and as a group necessary for basic production, their uprising would undoubtedly be shortlived.
Rampant banditry was an unstabilizing force not only to the state but also to the lives of the people. These conditions were mainly caused by the failure of the Silla state to enact any government policies on behalf of the people. In the end, the peasants who had lost faith in the state developed forces to protect themselves, and this appears to be the most important factor in the gradual legitimization and dominance of powerful local lineages.
Peasant revolts were not only the result of hostility towards irrational taxation, but also large-scale movements against the government that went beyond mere opposition to overtaxation by wealthy local families. Leading figures of the peasant army such as W?njong, Aeno, Kihw?n, and Yanggil, attracted peasants and developed their respective forces, ultimately causing Silla to crumble into a weakened state. Later Kogury? and Later Paekche were then founded by Kungye and Ky?nhwon who had championed equality and redistribution of land that peasants so greatly desired.
Intensified mass exploitation in later Silla had increasingly fettered and interrupted peasant lives on a daily basis. Unequal conditions of income through the development of commerce and peasant self-awareness became the crucial factors underlying countrywide peasant uprisings. Impoverished peasants greatly desired to extricate themselves from poverty but the difference in their wealth in relation to the aristocracy or merchants made their own deprivation appear even more severe. As a result, peasants adhered blindly to yusa religion or myths such as the ch'amwi myth.
In fact, although the peasants sought the redistribution of land, !hey believed that the only way to realize this was to eliminate the Silla dynasty and construct a new system entirely. Peasant self-awareness, by those who attempted to change traditions gone awry, functioned as an important impetus behind peasant resistance in later Silla. S?n buddhism also greatly influenced peasants peasants to participate in the uprising. S6n buddhist monks in later Silla strove to restore life to the masses, telling them that they possessed the same Buddha-nature as the ruling class. Therefore, although they did not support the peasant uprising per se, they had encouraged the development of peasant self-consciousness through the notion of differentiating between self and others, creating a theoretical foundation that supported the peasant rebellion.
Although the later Three Kingdoms period was established through the peasant uprisings, some distance still remained to be traversed before they would realize the society that the peasants envisioned. Kungye and Ky?hy?n replaced the Silla dynasty with another exploitative ruling class. It was not until the Kory? kingdom unified the later Three kingdoms that the bone-rank system was abolished, excessive exploitation prohibited, and a tithe demanded as tax in a policy in an effort to win peasant support. Although no reforms were initiated to redistribute land for peasants in terms of landownership relations, there were however certain effects, such as the prevention of excessive taxation, that enabled the peasants to maintain a stable livelihood. Moreover, powerful local lineages make it possible to advance to official positions in the capital based on ability. Thus, there is no denying that the local powers and the role of peasants became an important foundation of Kory? society.
The first significant large-scale uprising in which the peasants were involved was the Kim H?n-ch'an uprising in 815. Although this commoner uprising, bearing the characteristics of a coup d'etat, had spread to the provinces because of the antagonisms and conflicts amongst the central true bone aristorcracy, it was not a genuine peasant resistance based upon peasant power. Despite the participation of roving 'brigands' (toj?k) and 'grass brigands' (ch'oj?k), they were not centralized forces thus making this resistance nothing more than a peasant power struggle against the central aristocracy using military force.
A significant change occurred in the nature of the peasant armies after the Kim P?m-mun uprising in 825. The leader of the peasant army, Susin, a bandit from Kodarsan, consolidated forces with Kim P?m-mun and attempted to establish a new state capital. This was not simply an attempt by Susin to stop exploitation by regional officials and local landlords but rather an attempt to establish a new state. Thus it displayed characteristics distinct from the small-scale uprisings that occurred in reaction to exploitative taxation. Although the peasant armies had indeed allied themselves with the ruling strata to start the uprising, by the beginning of the 9th century, the uprising had already grown out of incipient forms and possessed the foundations of a statewide peasant resistance movement against the Silla state.
During King Chins?ng's reign (r. 887-896), the erupting peasant revolt swelled to a size that enabled the first step to be taken in the downfall of the Silla kingdom. The direct cause of this revolt was excessive taxation. Growing opposition against the state's taxation changed into a peasant uprising. Peasant uprisings in later Silla generally had occurred in Sangju, Chukchu, and W?nju, central transportation hubs, and erupted in each of these central regions. In addition to these areas, the peasant army appeared frequently in every comer of the country in Kangn?ng, Namhae, Kogs?ng, and Mungy?ng, and were called a variety of names such as Ch'oj?k (grass brigands), Nokrim (green forest), Ch?kio (band of thieves), Sanj?k (mountain brigands). Some peasant armies were even known as the 'Red Trousered Banditti' (ch?kko ch?k). However, they were essentially interested only in pillaging, making it unlikely that any social contradictions could be resolved through their development and as a group necessary for basic production, their uprising would undoubtedly be shortlived.
Rampant banditry was an unstabilizing force not only to the state but also to the lives of the people. These conditions were mainly caused by the failure of the Silla state to enact any government policies on behalf of the people. In the end, the peasants who had lost faith in the state developed forces to protect themselves, and this appears to be the most important factor in the gradual legitimization and dominance of powerful local lineages.
Peasant revolts were not only the result of hostility towards irrational taxation, but also large-scale movements against the government that went beyond mere opposition to overtaxation by wealthy local families. Leading figures of the peasant army such as W?njong, Aeno, Kihw?n, and Yanggil, attracted peasants and developed their respective forces, ultimately causing Silla to crumble into a weakened state. Later Kogury? and Later Paekche were then founded by Kungye and Ky?nhwon who had championed equality and redistribution of land that peasants so greatly desired.
Intensified mass exploitation in later Silla had increasingly fettered and interrupted peasant lives on a daily basis. Unequal conditions of income through the development of commerce and peasant self-awareness became the crucial factors underlying countrywide peasant uprisings. Impoverished peasants greatly desired to extricate themselves from poverty but the difference in their wealth in relation to the aristocracy or merchants made their own deprivation appear even more severe. As a result, peasants adhered blindly to yusa religion or myths such as the ch'amwi myth.
In fact, although the peasants sought the redistribution of land, !hey believed that the only way to realize this was to eliminate the Silla dynasty and construct a new system entirely. Peasant self-awareness, by those who attempted to change traditions gone awry, functioned as an important impetus behind peasant resistance in later Silla. S?n buddhism also greatly influenced peasants peasants to participate in the uprising. S6n buddhist monks in later Silla strove to restore life to the masses, telling them that they possessed the same Buddha-nature as the ruling class. Therefore, although they did not support the peasant uprising per se, they had encouraged the development of peasant self-consciousness through the notion of differentiating between self and others, creating a theoretical foundation that supported the peasant rebellion.
Although the later Three Kingdoms period was established through the peasant uprisings, some distance still remained to be traversed before they would realize the society that the peasants envisioned. Kungye and Ky?hy?n replaced the Silla dynasty with another exploitative ruling class. It was not until the Kory? kingdom unified the later Three kingdoms that the bone-rank system was abolished, excessive exploitation prohibited, and a tithe demanded as tax in a policy in an effort to win peasant support. Although no reforms were initiated to redistribute land for peasants in terms of landownership relations, there were however certain effects, such as the prevention of excessive taxation, that enabled the peasants to maintain a stable livelihood. Moreover, powerful local lineages make it possible to advance to official positions in the capital based on ability. Thus, there is no denying that the local powers and the role of peasants became an important foundation of Kory? society.
목차
머리말
1. 농민봉기외 여러 모습
2. 신라하대의 몇 가지 특성
3. 후삼국 성립 이후의 농민
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Peasant
Korea Journal
1988 .09
-
The Problem of Identity among Peasant Women in Korea
Korea Journal
1998 .06
-
Historical Characteristics of the Peasant War of 1894
Korea Journal
1994 .12
-
Tracing the Course of the Peasant War of 1894
Korea Journal
1994 .12
-
19세기 原州지역의 환곡문제와 농민항쟁
지방사와 지방문화
2010 .11
-
1930년대 농촌소설의 농민의식 반영 양상 : 김유정론
비평문학
2006 .12
-
동학농민전쟁에 대한 역사교과서 서술 내용의 새로운 모색 : 동아시아적 시각과 ‘나눔과 배려’의 정신을 중심으로
역사와 담론
2012 .04
-
프랑스의 農民運動(1789-1793)
역사와 세계
1987 .06
-
The Socioeconomic Background and the Growth of the New Social Forces of the 1894 Peasant War
Korea Journal
1994 .12
-
개발독재기 농민의 경제적 생존전략 다시 보기: 자본주의-소농사회 접합의 일단(一端)
민족문화연구
2016 .01
-
정창렬의 동학농민전쟁 연구의 내용과 의의
한국인물사연구
2016 .09
-
‘부대 속의 감자’ 또는 ‘혁명의 코러스’ : 마르크스의 농민관 재고찰
슬라브학보
2009 .09
-
The Spread of Peasant Movement and Changes in the Tenant Policy in the 1920's Colonial Korea
International Journal of Korean History
2001 .12
-
동학농민혁명 지역별 사례 연구의 성과와 전망
역사연구
2014 .12
-
농촌산업화에 따른 농민예술의 변화 : 아산시 송악면 평촌들을 중심으로
실천민속학연구
2010 .02
-
근현대 농민소설과 물의 재현
국어문학
2012 .02
-
한국 농민운동의 동향과 실태 연구
성곡논총
1989 .08
-
1862년 농민항쟁과 소통의 정책
한국사연구
2013 .06
-
농민전쟁의 계승과 그 계보
역사연구
2014 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018417264