지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The main conflict of The Merchant of Venice is one between a Jew, Shylock and a Christian Antonio. This conflict ends in a triumph of Antonio and a defeat of a Jew Shylock. Shylock is deprived of his daughter, money and even his religious identity because he is turned out to be one who tries to kill an innocent Christian Antonio. Because of the tragedy of Shylock, an argument in defining this drama as a comedy has been consistent, which is different from a traditional comedy even though it ends in happy marriages of three couples of lovers.
In some criticisms, Shakespeare has been criticized as a defender of anti-Judaism or as a defender of anti-Christianism. That is because in the drama Shylock is presented as a sort of devil who seeks to kill a Christian, Antonio who transgressed against his bond with the Jew, and at the same time the Christian Antonio is depicted as a merciless person who scorned Jews and their commercial activities in Venice. Shakespeare provides Shylock with enough reason to have a desire to revenge against the Christians. Meanwhile Shakespeare also presents Antonio as a Christ figure who shows self-less love towards his friend to extent that he risks his life to have his friend get married to a beautiful wealthy woman. In one aspect Shakespeare shows anti-Judaism through the villain Shylock and an good Christian Antonio, however, in other respect he shows anti-Christianity through presenting the egoist Christian Bassanio, Antonio and Portia.
This essay focused on the ambivalent aspects of two sides and discussed Shakespeare's attempt of destroying boundaries of good and evil in this drama. Consequently, from an objective viewpoint there is no absolute good and absolute evil. As shown in the dialogue between Bassanio and Portia in the last scene of the drama, while they are talking about the viewpoint of day and night, according to the place where they are now, the day and the night is oppositely determined.
Judgement results in the way of distinguish things according to viewer's stance and his environment and that is the way dualism may have conflicts.
Shakespeare shows his extraordinary insight through which he demolishes the boundaries between Judaism and Christianism and good and evil. Ultimately he suggests that overcoming the dualism may be the wisest way to overcome the tragedy of life.
In some criticisms, Shakespeare has been criticized as a defender of anti-Judaism or as a defender of anti-Christianism. That is because in the drama Shylock is presented as a sort of devil who seeks to kill a Christian, Antonio who transgressed against his bond with the Jew, and at the same time the Christian Antonio is depicted as a merciless person who scorned Jews and their commercial activities in Venice. Shakespeare provides Shylock with enough reason to have a desire to revenge against the Christians. Meanwhile Shakespeare also presents Antonio as a Christ figure who shows self-less love towards his friend to extent that he risks his life to have his friend get married to a beautiful wealthy woman. In one aspect Shakespeare shows anti-Judaism through the villain Shylock and an good Christian Antonio, however, in other respect he shows anti-Christianity through presenting the egoist Christian Bassanio, Antonio and Portia.
This essay focused on the ambivalent aspects of two sides and discussed Shakespeare's attempt of destroying boundaries of good and evil in this drama. Consequently, from an objective viewpoint there is no absolute good and absolute evil. As shown in the dialogue between Bassanio and Portia in the last scene of the drama, while they are talking about the viewpoint of day and night, according to the place where they are now, the day and the night is oppositely determined.
Judgement results in the way of distinguish things according to viewer's stance and his environment and that is the way dualism may have conflicts.
Shakespeare shows his extraordinary insight through which he demolishes the boundaries between Judaism and Christianism and good and evil. Ultimately he suggests that overcoming the dualism may be the wisest way to overcome the tragedy of life.
목차
1. 서론
2. 선과 악의 이분법 해체
3. 상대적 가치
4. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『베니스의 상인』의 쌍둥이 : 샤일록과 안토니오
신영어영문학
2012 .08
-
『베니스의 상인에 대한 기독교적 해석
영어영문학연구
2009 .01
-
셰익스피어와 정의 : 『베니스의 상인』을 중심으로
신영어영문학
2014 .11
-
『베니스의 상인』: 앤토니오의 우울함
Shakespeare Review
2011 .03
-
문제 희극으로서의 『베니스의 상인』 : 포오셔의 미해결의 난제들
Shakespeare Review
2003 .06
-
『베니스의 상인』의 병치와 대조의 구성을 통한 주제
Shakespeare Review
2015 .09
-
『베니스의 상인』(The Merchant of Venice)에 나타난 등가 교환의 윤리
Shakespeare Review
2013 .12
-
샤일록의 타자성
영어영문학연구
2012 .01
-
The Merchant of Venice: Materialism vs Humanism
신영어영문학
2008 .02
-
셰익스피어의 법률 희곡 『베니스의 상인』과 『자에는 자로』를 통한 셰익스피어의 법률관 연구
Shakespeare Review
2015 .09
-
도망친 딸 제시카는 왜 행복할까? : 종교적 타자의 가부장적 질서에 대한 기독교적 수용양식
새한영어영문학
2012 .11
-
ꡔ베니스의 상인ꡕ과 ꡔ몰타의 유대인ꡕ에 나타난 반유대주의의 전복적 양상
영어영문학21
2005 .01
-
Shylock 변호 : 역사적 관점에서 본 Shylock에 대한 긍정적 시각
Shakespeare Review
1987 .08
-
『베니스의 상인』에 나타난 탕자의 비유
영어영문학
2012 .08
-
『베니스의 상인』과 바울이 정치신학
Shakespeare Review
2013 .12
-
The Power Triangle of The Merchant of Venice and its Feminine Encroachment
Shakespeare Review
2015 .03
-
『베니스의 상인』에 나타난 경제논리와 윤리의 문제
신영어영문학
2000 .02
-
자유, 관용, 『베니스의 상인』
Shakespeare Review
2020 .03
-
Shakespeare 희극의 여성 인물 연구 : The Merchant of Venice의 Portia를 중심으로
Shakespeare Review
1996 .12
-
『베니스의 상인』의 '모험' 이데올로기
Shakespeare Review
2000 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
「베니스의 상인」에 나타난 부(富)와 인간관계
이환태
Shakespeare Review
2012
.03
문제 희극으로서의 『베니스의 상인』 : 포오셔의 미해결의 난제들
황규철
Shakespeare Review
2003
.06
『베니스의 상인』 (The Merchant of Venice)의 자비(Mercy) : 불교적 이해
성기서
Shakespeare Review
2014
.06
『베니스의 상인』에 나타난 경제논리와 윤리의 문제
김문규
신영어영문학
2000
.02
『뜻대로 하세요』: 전원적 이상주의와 비판적 풍자
이대석
Shakespeare Review
2000
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0