지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper attempts to read the dark pictures of the capitalism of our own time back into The Merchant of Venice. The play tries to establish a congruence between economic and ethical conduct in the emergent capital society which is premised on the priority of money over human value. But the central design to provide a congruence between those two finally turns out to be incomplete or contradictory. It is because the play provides very ideological resolution to the dilemmas raised in the course of action.
In this play, all the characters' business is thriving and various modes of acquiring and holding property are displayed. All the characters try to win: man’s nature is one of tricks and self-interest. The ‘flesh bond’ between Shylock and Antonio has become a typical incident which challenges the ruling norm of this mercenary society. But Shylock’s demand of law is crushed by Portia’s casuistry and ironically, confiscating his whole property by the name of mercy, the Venetian society of commerce is purged of its mercenary demon. Shylock's conviction that Christianity and revenge are synonyms is confirmed while Christians come into a windfall and relieved of financial cares. With this happy end Christians confirm the correspondence between human agency and divine plan, and reaffirm that ethical value will win against economic reasonings in the end. But the ‘Shylock trial’, on the other hand, strongly suggests that these beliefs are no more than winners' ideology.
Such words as ‘bond’, ‘hazard’, and ‘venture’ are among the most frequently used words in the play. In the sense that these words has become the key words of the capitalism of our own time, The Merchant of Venice, with the very significant title, foreshadows oncoming darkness of the capitalism.
In this play, all the characters' business is thriving and various modes of acquiring and holding property are displayed. All the characters try to win: man’s nature is one of tricks and self-interest. The ‘flesh bond’ between Shylock and Antonio has become a typical incident which challenges the ruling norm of this mercenary society. But Shylock’s demand of law is crushed by Portia’s casuistry and ironically, confiscating his whole property by the name of mercy, the Venetian society of commerce is purged of its mercenary demon. Shylock's conviction that Christianity and revenge are synonyms is confirmed while Christians come into a windfall and relieved of financial cares. With this happy end Christians confirm the correspondence between human agency and divine plan, and reaffirm that ethical value will win against economic reasonings in the end. But the ‘Shylock trial’, on the other hand, strongly suggests that these beliefs are no more than winners' ideology.
Such words as ‘bond’, ‘hazard’, and ‘venture’ are among the most frequently used words in the play. In the sense that these words has become the key words of the capitalism of our own time, The Merchant of Venice, with the very significant title, foreshadows oncoming darkness of the capitalism.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
셰익스피어와 정의 : 『베니스의 상인』을 중심으로
신영어영문학
2014 .11
-
『베니스의 상인에 대한 기독교적 해석
영어영문학연구
2009 .01
-
샤일록의 타자성
영어영문학연구
2012 .01
-
자유, 관용, 『베니스의 상인』
Shakespeare Review
2020 .03
-
『베니스의 상인』의 쌍둥이 : 샤일록과 안토니오
신영어영문학
2012 .08
-
도망친 딸 제시카는 왜 행복할까? : 종교적 타자의 가부장적 질서에 대한 기독교적 수용양식
새한영어영문학
2012 .11
-
『베니스의 상인』(The Merchant of Venice)에 나타난 등가 교환의 윤리
Shakespeare Review
2013 .12
-
Shylock 변호 : 역사적 관점에서 본 Shylock에 대한 긍정적 시각
Shakespeare Review
1987 .08
-
문제 희극으로서의 『베니스의 상인』 : 포오셔의 미해결의 난제들
Shakespeare Review
2003 .06
-
The Merchant of Venice: Materialism vs Humanism
신영어영문학
2008 .02
-
『베니스의 상인』(The Merchant of Venice)에 나타난 이원론의 해체
비평문학
2008 .08
-
『베니스의 상인』의 '모험' 이데올로기
Shakespeare Review
2000 .12
-
셰익스피어의 법률 희곡 『베니스의 상인』과 『자에는 자로』를 통한 셰익스피어의 법률관 연구
Shakespeare Review
2015 .09
-
The Power Triangle of The Merchant of Venice and its Feminine Encroachment
Shakespeare Review
2015 .03
-
Shylock's Logical Progress Toward Revenge
Shakespeare Review
1986 .08
-
[베니스의 상인](The Merchant of Venice)에 나타난 경제논리와 윤리의 문제
신영어영문학회 학술발표회 자료집
1999 .08
-
샤일록의 재번역 : 줄리아 파스칼의 The Shylock Play
현대영미드라마
2017 .12
-
『베니스의 상인』 (The Merchant of Venice)의 자비(Mercy) : 불교적 이해
Shakespeare Review
2014 .06
-
『베니스의 상인』의 병치와 대조의 구성을 통한 주제
Shakespeare Review
2015 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
[베니스의 상인](The Merchant of Venice)에 나타난 경제논리와 윤리의 문제
김문규
신영어영문학회 학술발표회 자료집
1999
.08
『베니스의 상인』에 나타난 여주인공의 양성성에 관한 연구
김경혜
Shakespeare Review
2011
.09
『베니스의 상인』의 쌍둥이: 샤일록과 안토니오
남정애
신영어영문학회 학술발표회 자료집
1999
.08
『베니스의 상인』 : 전통적 가치의 변화
박효춘
Shakespeare Review
2012
.12
『베니스의 상인』의 쌍둥이 : 샤일록과 안토니오
남정애
신영어영문학
2012
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-840-016403857