메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
새한영어영문학회 새한영어영문학 새한영어영문학 제46권 제1호
발행연도
2004.3
수록면
23 - 47 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Although Deleuze was anointed as a cardinal philosopher of the 21st century by Foucault, it is surprising to notice that little attention has been drawn to his theory in the Feminist camp. He has been less focused than Foucault and Lacan, even Derrida have. Feminists argue that his theories, including becoming-woman, are too abstract to catch women's reality and lives, and too fluid to enact the part of the worrier of women's liberation. From the point of view of some feminists, Deleuze is considered merely as a refined, sophisticated male thinker in the postmodem period.
In this study I attempt to examine the responses of a few distinguished feminists to his theory and explore positive effects of the encounter between Feminist and Deleuzian theories. In so doing, my focus is on the female body, which is an important issue in either. In Feminism, the female body is the locus of woman's sexuality and desire. For Deleuze, the body without organs is a disorganized, deoedipalized body of constantly emergent desire and intensity. I argue the encounter between the female body and a Deleuzian body without organs may produce a kind of postmodem discourse, subverting the repressive dichotomy of man/woman. Luce Irigaray, among other feminists, offers such a similar definition of otherness to Deleuze's that her concept of sexual difference is translated into Deleuzian terms without warping the sheer alterity, In short, Deleuzian discourse of the body can be regarded as a postmodern feminst theory, to many feminists' surprise.
Deleuzian theory of the body without organs is also important in creating the corporeal discourse. In Feminism and other fields of theory, the corporeality or the materiality of discourse is getting more crucial as the mind/body dualism has been rejected. The body is no longer understood as an ahistorical, biologically given object but as the lived body in particular cultures. In order to capture the specificity of the body, it is necessary for discourse itself to get corporeal, the good example of which Deleuzian pragmatics gives to us.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론 : 탈근대 담론으로서 여성의 몸
Ⅱ. 들뢰즈의 (기관 없는) 몸 철학
Ⅲ. 들뢰즈의 몸 철학과 페미니즘의 조우
Ⅳ. 탈근대 페미니즘 담론으로서 들뢰즈의 몸 철학
Ⅴ. 결론 : 육체적인 몸 담론의 생성을 위하여
인용문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0