지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The definitions of particles are various according to theoretical perspectives, but it is widely accepted in much of the syntactic literature that particles and prepositions are syntactically and semantically different and particles, more bound to the verb, can be moved to the right of the following NP.
The particle movement, however, does not explain why or why not some particles move. This study examines the inadequacy of particle movement, categorizes particles as prepositions based on their historical and phonetical similarities, and proposes a mapping rule between the argument structure and categorial structure.
In the construction, V-P-NP, prepositional elements can be subcategorized as head and nonhead. Nonhead prepositions with the semantic content, 'completion' can compose compound predicates with verbal elements in the predicate argument structure. They can be also mapped to the categorial structure V-NP-P.
This mapping rule states that the traditional phrasal verbs and prepositional verbs can be generalized in the representation of predicate argument structure, and explains why some prepositions can be accepted as NP-P.
The particle movement, however, does not explain why or why not some particles move. This study examines the inadequacy of particle movement, categorizes particles as prepositions based on their historical and phonetical similarities, and proposes a mapping rule between the argument structure and categorial structure.
In the construction, V-P-NP, prepositional elements can be subcategorized as head and nonhead. Nonhead prepositions with the semantic content, 'completion' can compose compound predicates with verbal elements in the predicate argument structure. They can be also mapped to the categorial structure V-NP-P.
This mapping rule states that the traditional phrasal verbs and prepositional verbs can be generalized in the representation of predicate argument structure, and explains why some prepositions can be accepted as NP-P.
목차
1. 머릿말
2. 첨사의 정의와 분석 범위
3. 첨사이동의 부적절성
4. 동사-전치사-명사구의 노항구조와 범주구조 사상(mapping)
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
On the Selectional Properties of Roots
생성문법연구
2017 .01
-
A Cognitive-Semantic Account for English Particles
영어영문학연구
2009 .01
-
THE STRUCTURE OF VERB-PARTICLE RELATIONS IN ENGLISH
어학연구
1967 .04
-
‘On’의 의미
어학연구
1981 .12
-
한국어 조사 연구의 현황과 전망
한국어학
2002 .08
-
15세기 국어 타동사의 논항구조 변화 연구(2) -‘NP로’ 논항의 형성을 중심으로-
이중언어학
2005 .01
-
영어 다어 동사 교수의 문제와 제안
영어학
2008 .06
-
The Diachronic Change of Particle Position from Preverbal into Postverbal in English
언어과학
2014 .01
-
조사 `이/가`와 `을/를`의 통사와 의미
한국어학
2010 .11
-
영어 전치사의 확장
언어과학
2004 .01
-
A Cognitive-Semantic Account for the Formation of Two-word and Three-word Verbs
언어학 연구
2015 .04
-
자동사의 논항구조에 관한 통시적 연구 : 'NP에', 'NP로' 논항 형성을 중심으로
언어과학연구
2004 .12
-
“動詞+在”結構新論
중어중문학
2014 .12
-
동사-불변화사 결합력에 관한 연구: 코퍼스 분석을 중심으로
영어영문학
2019 .08
-
영어 전치사구의 명사구적 속성
새한영어영문학
2002 .11
-
A Data-based Analysis of the Formation of Phrasal Verbs in English
언어학 연구
2017 .04
-
‘개사현공’의 이론적 가능성과 활용 방안
중국학
2017 .01
-
Four Faces of Up as a Functional Particle
어학연구
2001 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0