지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2002.6
- 수록면
- 37 - 43 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The 21<SUP>st</SUP> century is a cultural diversified one. Recognition and tolerance of cultural identity are the basic wishes of modern people, however, which can't eliminate the cultural clash. To establish a new East-Asian cultural community and improve beneficial cultural interaction between China, Japan and Korea, we must turn to the traditional philosophy of East-Asian culture that is the philosophy of "Harmony". It indicates compatibility of different cultures and coexistence of diversified cultures. Its basic spirit lies in the emphasis of coexistence and coordination of different cultures. "Coexistence" is a harmonic living style based on our realization of dependency and interaction characteristics in mankind, while "coordination", as the prerequisite of "coexistence" emphasizes the responsibility, based on tolerance. In a sense, "coordination" suggests the principle of "moderation". Only if China, Japan and Korea reach this primary common ground will East Asia gain the opportunity of entering a new cultural- fusion era.
The up-to-date indication of Chinese, Japanese and Korean cultural popularity is the wave of Japanese and Korean popular cultures in China. The reason is that the Japanese and Korean popular cultures provide Chinese teenagers with certain cultural consumption needs. The similarity of cultural roots in the three countries also contributes to this fashion wave. This demonstration is also the regional reflection of economic globalization. With China's entering WTO, Chinese cultural market will inevitably deepen its opening to the outside world, while at the same time foreign cultural goods will, in large scales, swarm in. However, within a visible period of time, China needn't worry about this, because: first of all, the central government will continue its control on the content of culture, so foreign capital can only directly be introduced into some later parts of the cultural industry; second, WTO only paves the way for the entrance of capital and its operation pattern, as the logic of capital is interest-oriented but not value-oriented; third, cultural communication should possesses an ideal "The world belongs to all" spirit, so that it can eliminate hegemony by tolerating and improve mutual benefits by cooperating.
Cultural industry is the most promising industry in the 21st century for the following reasons: first, under the conditions of high tech and numberlization, a balance between material demand and spiritual demand has become the essential condition for the survival and development of human society. It has became an important condition for the healthy development of human society to develop cultural industry and meet the spiritual needs of people with richer spiritual cultural goods. Second, with the development of social productive forces and the gradually sufficient of material life, people have more free time, which will surely increase the need of spiritual cultural consumption. Third, in the new time, capital form has changed dramatically. The single currency capital is gradually giving way to various capital forms such as currency capital, cultural capital, and symbolized capital, among which the cultural capital has become a vital standard of measuring the comprehensive power of a country or a region. Last, according to the global industrial structure and the economic development trend, cultural industry in the developing countries has a huge potentiality, which hasn't been brought into full play now because the speed of their cultural industry marketlization is comparatively low and their management is relatively weaker.
Japan, Korea and China differ in their development stages. Japan has stepped into the post-industry age and Korea is a newly developing country while China is a great developing country, rapidly growing. So the three countries can complement each other in their economic structure. As for the cultural industry, Japan and Korea are now comparatively more prosperous. China is weaker in this field because of its short history. However, China is believed as the largest market in the 21<SUP>st</SUP> century. Therefore, there is a wide prospect in enhancing cooperation in cultural industry.
In the human history, the geographic closing has once been the approach for people to communicate, as well as the convenient place for different countries to carry out wars for resources. But when man walking into an age of informationlization and economic globalization, the meaning of resource snatching is decreasing. The prosperous of a country lies more in its creativity of culture, intelligence, science and technology. Over the past decades, China, Japan and Korea have achieved great accomplishments in their economy, which has won unanimous recognition in the world. In the new century, it is necessary for them to enhance cooperation so as to open up a new frontier for the renaissance of Asian culture.
21世?是文化多元化的世?，文化?同?文化?容是?代人的基本?求，但其?不能消?文化之?的矛盾。?建新的??文化共同?，促?中日?三?文化的良性互?，必?挺立植根于??文化自身??的和合理念。和合就是主?不同文化的兼容，多元文化的共生。其基本精神在于强?不同文化的和生?和?。和生是在意?到人?的依附性及互?性的基?上而?展出的强?和?的生存方式。而作?和生前提的和??强?以?容?基?的?任，和?原?在一定意?上是?制原?。中日?三?只有?成和合?一最低限度的共?，??才有可能?入一?新的文化?合期。
中日?文化流行的?下症候是日本、??流行文化?行中?，原因是: 日?流行文化?中??少年提供了文化消?的某些需要，而中日?文化根基的相近又????行提供了基?。??症候也是??全球化?程的?域表征。?着中?加入WTO，中?文化市?必??一步?外?放，?外文化商品??大?模?入。但在可??的不短??里，中?不必?此而??: 首先，?家?文化的?容部分???保持管束，?外?本能?直接?入的多是文化生?的下游部分; 其次，WTO只是??本的?入和?本?作方式的?入打?大?，而?本的??是利益取向而不是价?取向; 第三，文化交往?有"天下?公"的理想精神，在包容中消解??，在?作中增益互惠。
文化??是21世?全球最有前途的??，依据是: 首先，在高科技、?字化的?件下，物?需求和精神需求的平衡已成?人?社?生存和?展的必要?件。?展文化??，以更?富的精神文化?品??足人?精神文化需求，已?成?人?社?健康?展的重要?件; 其次，?着社?生?力的?展和人?物?生活的逐步富裕，人?的?暇??大?增多，而?暇??的增多，必?大大增加精神文化消?的需求; 第三，在新的?代?件下，?本形式己??生了重大?化，?一的???本逐??化????本、文化?本和象征?本等多元?本形式，而文化?本已?成?衡量一??家或地?的?合?力的重要指?; 最后，?全球????和???展的??看，?展中?家的文化??具有巨大的?力，但文化??的市?化程度?低，??管理水平?弱，?能?未?放出?。
日本、??和中?在?展?段上有差?: 日本已?入后工??代，??是新?工??家，中?是加速成?的?展中大?，因此三?在????上有?强的互?性。就文化??而言，?在日本、??比???，中?因起步??而相??弱，但中?是21世?世界最大的市?。加强中日?三?在文化???域的合作，具有非常??的??前景。
在人?的?史上，地理上的接近曾是人民互相?往的坦途，也是?家?因???源而??的方便?所。在人??入信息化、??走向全球化的?代，?源??的意?在消?，?家的?盛更多地取?于其文化、知?、科?技?上的?造力。中日?三?人民在?去的?十年中在??上已取得世界公?的成就，在新的世?中??加强合作，??洲的文化????道路。
The up-to-date indication of Chinese, Japanese and Korean cultural popularity is the wave of Japanese and Korean popular cultures in China. The reason is that the Japanese and Korean popular cultures provide Chinese teenagers with certain cultural consumption needs. The similarity of cultural roots in the three countries also contributes to this fashion wave. This demonstration is also the regional reflection of economic globalization. With China's entering WTO, Chinese cultural market will inevitably deepen its opening to the outside world, while at the same time foreign cultural goods will, in large scales, swarm in. However, within a visible period of time, China needn't worry about this, because: first of all, the central government will continue its control on the content of culture, so foreign capital can only directly be introduced into some later parts of the cultural industry; second, WTO only paves the way for the entrance of capital and its operation pattern, as the logic of capital is interest-oriented but not value-oriented; third, cultural communication should possesses an ideal "The world belongs to all" spirit, so that it can eliminate hegemony by tolerating and improve mutual benefits by cooperating.
Cultural industry is the most promising industry in the 21st century for the following reasons: first, under the conditions of high tech and numberlization, a balance between material demand and spiritual demand has become the essential condition for the survival and development of human society. It has became an important condition for the healthy development of human society to develop cultural industry and meet the spiritual needs of people with richer spiritual cultural goods. Second, with the development of social productive forces and the gradually sufficient of material life, people have more free time, which will surely increase the need of spiritual cultural consumption. Third, in the new time, capital form has changed dramatically. The single currency capital is gradually giving way to various capital forms such as currency capital, cultural capital, and symbolized capital, among which the cultural capital has become a vital standard of measuring the comprehensive power of a country or a region. Last, according to the global industrial structure and the economic development trend, cultural industry in the developing countries has a huge potentiality, which hasn't been brought into full play now because the speed of their cultural industry marketlization is comparatively low and their management is relatively weaker.
Japan, Korea and China differ in their development stages. Japan has stepped into the post-industry age and Korea is a newly developing country while China is a great developing country, rapidly growing. So the three countries can complement each other in their economic structure. As for the cultural industry, Japan and Korea are now comparatively more prosperous. China is weaker in this field because of its short history. However, China is believed as the largest market in the 21<SUP>st</SUP> century. Therefore, there is a wide prospect in enhancing cooperation in cultural industry.
In the human history, the geographic closing has once been the approach for people to communicate, as well as the convenient place for different countries to carry out wars for resources. But when man walking into an age of informationlization and economic globalization, the meaning of resource snatching is decreasing. The prosperous of a country lies more in its creativity of culture, intelligence, science and technology. Over the past decades, China, Japan and Korea have achieved great accomplishments in their economy, which has won unanimous recognition in the world. In the new century, it is necessary for them to enhance cooperation so as to open up a new frontier for the renaissance of Asian culture.
21世?是文化多元化的世?，文化?同?文化?容是?代人的基本?求，但其?不能消?文化之?的矛盾。?建新的??文化共同?，促?中日?三?文化的良性互?，必?挺立植根于??文化自身??的和合理念。和合就是主?不同文化的兼容，多元文化的共生。其基本精神在于强?不同文化的和生?和?。和生是在意?到人?的依附性及互?性的基?上而?展出的强?和?的生存方式。而作?和生前提的和??强?以?容?基?的?任，和?原?在一定意?上是?制原?。中日?三?只有?成和合?一最低限度的共?，??才有可能?入一?新的文化?合期。
中日?文化流行的?下症候是日本、??流行文化?行中?，原因是: 日?流行文化?中??少年提供了文化消?的某些需要，而中日?文化根基的相近又????行提供了基?。??症候也是??全球化?程的?域表征。?着中?加入WTO，中?文化市?必??一步?外?放，?外文化商品??大?模?入。但在可??的不短??里，中?不必?此而??: 首先，?家?文化的?容部分???保持管束，?外?本能?直接?入的多是文化生?的下游部分; 其次，WTO只是??本的?入和?本?作方式的?入打?大?，而?本的??是利益取向而不是价?取向; 第三，文化交往?有"天下?公"的理想精神，在包容中消解??，在?作中增益互惠。
文化??是21世?全球最有前途的??，依据是: 首先，在高科技、?字化的?件下，物?需求和精神需求的平衡已成?人?社?生存和?展的必要?件。?展文化??，以更?富的精神文化?品??足人?精神文化需求，已?成?人?社?健康?展的重要?件; 其次，?着社?生?力的?展和人?物?生活的逐步富裕，人?的?暇??大?增多，而?暇??的增多，必?大大增加精神文化消?的需求; 第三，在新的?代?件下，?本形式己??生了重大?化，?一的???本逐??化????本、文化?本和象征?本等多元?本形式，而文化?本已?成?衡量一??家或地?的?合?力的重要指?; 最后，?全球????和???展的??看，?展中?家的文化??具有巨大的?力，但文化??的市?化程度?低，??管理水平?弱，?能?未?放出?。
日本、??和中?在?展?段上有差?: 日本已?入后工??代，??是新?工??家，中?是加速成?的?展中大?，因此三?在????上有?强的互?性。就文化??而言，?在日本、??比???，中?因起步??而相??弱，但中?是21世?世界最大的市?。加强中日?三?在文化???域的合作，具有非常??的??前景。
在人?的?史上，地理上的接近曾是人民互相?往的坦途，也是?家?因???源而??的方便?所。在人??入信息化、??走向全球化的?代，?源??的意?在消?，?家的?盛更多地取?于其文化、知?、科?技?上的?造力。中日?三?人民在?去的?十年中在??上已取得世界公?的成就，在新的世?中??加强合作，??洲的文化????道路。
목차
一、和合精神: ??文化?展的基本理念
二、日?居中: ??文化交流行的?下症候
三、文化??: ??文化合作的???景
提要
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
限韓令 展開와 文化콘텐츠産業의 課題
중국학논총
2018 .01
-
한ㆍ중ㆍ일 3국간 문화콘텐츠산업에서의 협력방안
지역개발연구
2003 .07
-
한국 문화컨텐츠산업의 대동남아시아 경제협력 방안
한국문화산업학회 학술대회
2009 .06
-
한국-동남아시아 국가와의 경제협력에 따른 문화컨텐츠 산업협력 방안
무역학회지
2009 .04
-
한 · 중 문화산업의 현황과 전망
문화산업연구
2013 .03
-
한국 문화컨텐츠산업의 대동남아시아 경제협력 방안
문화산업연구
2009 .06
-
동북아 주요국가의 과학기술 인식에 대한 연구 : 한ㆍ중ㆍ일 비교를 중심으로
중국과 중국학
2009 .08
-
대중예술문화산업과 헌법－법제개선을 위한 기본방향－
일감법학
2013 .01
-
한중일 3국 협력 현황과 발전 과제 연구
동북아 문화연구
2020 .03
-
한국문화산업의 정책방향 : 문화체육관광부의 역할을 중심으로
문화산업연구
2008 .06
-
China, World Economy and Korea-China Economic Cooperation
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2012 .12
-
Do Korea, China and Japan form a cultural cluster?
국제경영연구
2013 .01
-
한국 엔터테인먼트산업의 시장전망과 발전방안에 관한 연구 : 영화ㆍ애니메이션산업을 중심으로
관광레저연구
2002 .01
-
Neoliberal Reform, Cultural Policy Changes, and the Transformation of Cultural Industries in South Korea
아시아리뷰
2018 .02
-
지식정보사회의 문화산업정책
정부학연구
2004 .01
-
東アジア安保秩序の変化と日 · 韓安保協力
동북아 문화연구
2013 .03
-
동아시아 문화공동체의 실현을 위한 한국의 전략
동남아연구
2010 .01
-
21세기 한·중·일의 기술교류와 경제협력
경영경제
2003 .02
-
Geographic Concentration of Advertising Industry in East Asia : China, Japan, and its world cities
대한지리학회 컨퍼런스 자료집
2011 .11
-
문화산업, 내셔널리즘, 문화공공성 : 21세기 중국의 문화 경제와 문화민주화 문제
마르크스주의 연구
2009 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
How the Korean Online Gaming Industry Has Evolved: An Institutional Analysis
Seongcheol Kim
,
Jiwhan Kim
정보사회와 미디어
2011
.06
A Study on the Animation Development Process for Successful Market Entrance
Jai-Jin Jung
,
Dong-Hee Choi
한국멀티미디어학회 국제학술대회
2007
.08
A Study for Success Factors in On-line Games
Jung Jai-jin
멀티미디어학회논문지
2006
.12
전통예술의 콘텐츠화와 문화산업화를 위한 사례 분석 : 불교의례 악가무를 중심으로
윤소희
문화산업연구
2008
.12
Animation Trends in New Media in Southeast Asia
Ma
,
k Joseph Chavez
한국만화애니메이션학회 학술대회자료집
2008
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0