지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study is focused on archetype consciousness and recognition about the word “Sea(海)” in Ancient Chinese. But the contents concerned with the sea is scattered in ancient Chinese records, I focused on the scriptures ≪Shang Shu(尙書)≫ that is representative documents of pre-Qin, especially the Xia(夏), Shang(商) and Zhou(周) periods. So I divided it into three parts that are Characteristic meaning, Geographic meaning and Space meaning.
I found two symbolic meanings throughout the Chinese Character “Sea”. First, Ancient Chinese regarded “Sea” as a substance that was understood as an extension of “Water”, it accepts all of streams and includes all creatures. Second, they regarded the “Sea” as a murky world that was alienated from a human society.
From a Geographic viewpoint, the “Sea” was the matter that could divide the area. Ancient Chinese people in pre-Qin society wholly focused on the concept of “Water”, and regarded the “Sea” as the continental edge, it's meaning was not important to them. Although they regarded the “Sea” as a region's boundary, this definition was based on a general meaning of region's section, was not concrete nor accurate meaning. They used it as a meaning of region that was outside of a capital city, and thought it as backward and uncivilized. In addition, they regarded the “Sea” as a substance that can accept all streams and include all creatures.
In space perception, they created “The Four Seas(四海)”. So their perceptive sphere of sea was became wider from practical direction and geographic boundary to the concept of space extensity. Through the relationship of center and remote region, they developed a concept of an enlarged idea that involved the area of subordinated groups. Through the theory of “Ji-Fu(畿服)”, they created distinction between majority (the inside) and minority(the outside). And at the same time, they also saw “The Four Seas” as a space extensity, so it could absorb these two matters. In other words, they created the distinction of ‘civilian(華)’ and ‘barbarian(夷)’, and they bound up these two types simultaneously in a circumference of a world system. I think this idea is the foundation of China oriented theory.
I found two symbolic meanings throughout the Chinese Character “Sea”. First, Ancient Chinese regarded “Sea” as a substance that was understood as an extension of “Water”, it accepts all of streams and includes all creatures. Second, they regarded the “Sea” as a murky world that was alienated from a human society.
From a Geographic viewpoint, the “Sea” was the matter that could divide the area. Ancient Chinese people in pre-Qin society wholly focused on the concept of “Water”, and regarded the “Sea” as the continental edge, it's meaning was not important to them. Although they regarded the “Sea” as a region's boundary, this definition was based on a general meaning of region's section, was not concrete nor accurate meaning. They used it as a meaning of region that was outside of a capital city, and thought it as backward and uncivilized. In addition, they regarded the “Sea” as a substance that can accept all streams and include all creatures.
In space perception, they created “The Four Seas(四海)”. So their perceptive sphere of sea was became wider from practical direction and geographic boundary to the concept of space extensity. Through the relationship of center and remote region, they developed a concept of an enlarged idea that involved the area of subordinated groups. Through the theory of “Ji-Fu(畿服)”, they created distinction between majority (the inside) and minority(the outside). And at the same time, they also saw “The Four Seas” as a space extensity, so it could absorb these two matters. In other words, they created the distinction of ‘civilian(華)’ and ‘barbarian(夷)’, and they bound up these two types simultaneously in a circumference of a world system. I think this idea is the foundation of China oriented theory.
목차
1. 서론
2. ‘海’의 문자적 의미
3. ‘海’의 지리적 의미
4. ‘海’의 공간적 작용
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『尙書』에 관한 문헌학적 고찰
아시아연구
2018 .11
-
근대중국 해양관련 개념의 형성과 바다 이미지의 변화
동북아 문화연구
2011 .12
-
해양문학과 기행담론
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2008 .11
-
The South China Sea : Back to the Future?
Global Asia
2010 .12
-
China’s Position on the Territorial Sea Regime in Terms of the South China Sea Disputes: Straight Baselines and Innocent Passage of Warships around Disputed Islands
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2018 .01
-
온라인 공간상의 동해 지명 표기에 관한 연구
응용지리
2009 .12
-
전략환경평가 사후관리 해외 사례 분석
환경영향평가
2015 .01
-
The Cases of International Standardization of Sea Names and Their Implications for Justifying the Name East Sea
대한지리학회지
2007 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
中國古中世史學會 會則 외
편집부
중국고중세사연구
2015
.02
榮新江, 『中古中國與粟特文明』 : 北京: 生活ㆍ讀書ㆍ新知三聯書店, 2014.8 7 p. (目次) + 3 p. (序) + 10 p. (代前言) + 445 p. (本文ㆍ索引).
李基天
중국고중세사연구
2015
.02
唐ㆍ五代 法典 編纂 形式의 변화와 그 성격 : 『唐會要』ㆍ『五代會要』 ‘定格令’ 譯註
鄭炳俊
중국고중세사연구
2015
.02
唐 文宗 시기 甘露之變에 대한 재고찰 : 宦官 仇士良 세력의 역할을 중심으로
柳浚炯
중국고중세사연구
2015
.02
『梁書ㆍ蕭琛傳』 所見齊、梁間的南北互動
李廣健
중국고중세사연구
2015
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-014952214